Skip to main content

Arthroscopic Partial Wrist Fusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wrist and Elbow Arthroscopy

Abstract

Partial wrist fusion is a widely accepted concept and technique in salvaging a failing wrist with preservation of motion and function, with adequate pain control. Conventionally the open surgical approach may induce excessive stiffness, infringe vascularity, impair bony union, and prolong rehabilitation. Arthroscopic approach provides unimpeded articular view of the wrist and hence offers excellent ground for various forms of partial wrist fusion. Combining with strong percutaneous fixation technique, arthroscopic partial wrist fusion can potentially generate a better functional outcome by preserving the maximal motion pertained with each type of partial wrist fusion.

From Nov 1997 to Oct 2011, arthroscopic partial wrist fusion was performed in 23 patients of an average age of 42 years old (range 18–68 years old). These include STT fusion in three, scaphoidectomy plus four corners fusion in five, scaphoidectomy plus capitolunate fusion in four, lunatectomy plus scaphocapitate fusion in three, radioscapholunate fusion in four, radiolunate fusion in two, and luno-triquetral fusion in two. Through the radiocarpal or midcarpal joint, the corresponding articular surfaces were denuded of cartilage using arthroscopic burr and curette. Carpal bones involved in the fusion process were then transfixed with K wires percutaneously after the alignment being corrected under fluoroscopic control. Autogenous cancellous bone graft or bone substitute could be inserted and impacted to the fusion site through a cannula under the direct arthroscopic view. The final fixation was achieved with multiple K wires or cannulated screws. Early mobilization was encouraged.

Surgical complications were few and minor, including pin tract infection, skin burn, and delay union. Radiological union of the fusion site was obtained in 19 cases, stable asymptomatic fibrous union in three cases, and definite nonunion requiring revision in one case. At an average follow-up of 59.9 months (range 11–112 months), the symptom was resolved or improved and the functional motion was obtained in all cases. The surgical scars were almost invisible and the aesthetic outcome was excellent.

In conclusion, arthroscopic partial wrist fusion is a viable option for patients suffering from posttraumatic or nonprogressive wrist arthritis who would like to preserve useful wrist motion with good aesthetic outcome. Union rate is high and complication uncommon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krimmer H, Wiemer P, Kalb K. Comparative outcome assessment of the wrist joint-mediocarpal partial arthrodesis and total arthrodesis. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2000;32:369–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peterson HA, Lipscomb PR. Intercarpal arthrodesis. Arch Surg. 1967;95:127–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasting DE, Silver RL. Intercarpal arthrodesis in the management of chronic carpal instability after trauma. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9:834–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Minami A, Kato H, Iwasaki N. Limited wrist fusions: comparison of results 22 and 89 months after surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:133–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tomaino M. Intercarpal fusion for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion. Hand Clin. 2001;17(4):671–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Siegel LM, Ruby LK. A critical look at intercarpal arthrodesis: review of literature. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21:717–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Douglas DP, Peimer CA, Koniuch MP. Motion of the wrist after simulated limited intercarpal arthrodesis: an experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:1413–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Elias M, Cooney WP, An KN. Wrist kinematics after limited intercarpal arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14A:791–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iwasaki N, Genda E, Barrance PJ, et al. Biomechanical analysis of limited intercarpal fusion for the treatment of Kienbock’s disease: a three-dimensional theoretical study. J Orthop Res. 1998;16(2):256–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobza PE, Budoff JE, Yeh ML. Management of the scaphoid during four-corner fusion—a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(6):904–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Middleton A, MacGregor D, Compson JP. An anatomical database of carpal bone measurements for intercarpal arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(4):315–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hastings H. Arthrodesis (partial and complete). In: Pederson WC, Wolfe SW, editors. Green’s operative hand surgery, vol. 1. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nagy L, Büchler U. Long-term results of radioscapholunate fusion following fracture of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22B:705–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. del Piñal F. Dry arthroscopy and its applications. Hand Clin. 2011;27:335–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ho PC, Lo WN. Arthroscopic resection of volar ganglion of the wrist: a new technique. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(2):218–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sauerbier M, Trankle M, Erdmann D. Functional outcome with scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthrodesis in the treatment of Kienbock’s disease stage III. Ann Plast Surg. 2000;44(6):618–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Minami A, Kato H, Suenaga N. Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid fusion: long-term follow-up study. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(3):319–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wollstein R, Watson HK. Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthrodesis for arthritis. Hand Clin. 2005;21(4):539–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sauerbier M, Trankle M. Midcarpal arthrodesis with complete scaphoid excision and interposition bone graft in the treatment of advanced carpal collapse (SNAC/SLAC wrist): operative technique and outcome assessment. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25(4):341–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Enna M, Hoepfner P, Weiss AP. Scaphoid excision with four-corner fusion. Hand Clin. 2005;21(4):531–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taleisnik J. Subtotal arthrodesis of the wrist joint. Clin Orthop. 1984;187:81–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss LE, Taras JS, Sweet S, Osterman AL. Lunotriquetral injuries in athletes. Hand Clin. 2000;16:433–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ho PC. Arthroscopic partial wrist fusion. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2008;12:242–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Slade III JF, Bomback DA. Percutaneous capitolunate arthrodesis using arthroscopic or limited approach. In: Osterman A, Slade III JF, editors. Atlas of the hand clinics: scaphoid injuries, Scaphoid injuries, vol. 8:1. 2003. p. 149–62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yajima H, Kobata Y, Shigematsu K. Radiocarpal arthrodesis for osteoarthritis following fractures of the distal radius. Hand Surg. 2004;9(2):203–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ishikawa H, Murasawa A, Nakazono K. Long-term follow-up study of radiocarpal arthrodesis for the rheumatoid wrist. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(4):658–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garcia-Elias M, Lluch AL. Resection of the distal scaphoid for scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;24(4):448–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guidera PM, Watson HK, Dwyer TA. Lunotriquetral arthrodesis using cancellous bone graft. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(3):422–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vandesande W, De Smet L, Van Ransbeeck H. Lunotriquetral arthrodesis, a procedure with a high failure rate. Acta Orthop Belg. 2001;67(4):361–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sennwald GR, Fischer M, Mondi P. Lunotriquetral arthrodesis: a controversial procedure. J Hand Surg Br. 1995;20(6):755–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pisano SM, Peimer CA, Wheeler DR. Scaphocapitate intercarpal arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Am. 1991;9:501–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pak-cheong Ho MBBS, FRCS, FHKCOS, FHKAM (ORTHO) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ho, Pc. (2015). Arthroscopic Partial Wrist Fusion. In: Geissler, W. (eds) Wrist and Elbow Arthroscopy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1596-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1596-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1595-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1596-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics