Abstract
For decades, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been used routinely and safely for patients undergoing conventional redo on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (redo-CABG) surgery. The efficacy and safety of redo-CABG have been well documented across a large spectrum of surgeons and patient populations with mortality rates approaching those of primary CABGs (Ann Thorac Surg 80:1719–27, 2005). In many respects, redo-CABG remains the gold standard for repeated coronary revascularization. However, the obligatory aortic manipulation, global myocardial ischemia requiring myocardial protection in advanced coronary disease, and systemic inflammatory response associated with CPB are avoided during redo off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (redo-OPCAB). To avoid the morbidity attributable to CPB, there has been a resurgence of interest in the application of OPCAB techniques to repeat coronary revascularization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sabik III JF, Blackstone EH, Houghtaling PL, Walts PA, Lytle BW. Is reoperation still a risk factor in coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1719–27.
Puskas JD, Cheng D, Knight J, Angelini G, DeCannier D, Diegeler, A, Dullum M, Martin J, Ochi M, Patel N, Sim E, Trehan N, Zamvar V. Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting; a meta-analysis and consensus statement from the 2004 ISMICS Consensus Conference. Innovations. Fall 2005;1(1):3–27.
Puskas JD, Edwards FH, Pappas PA, O’Brien S, Peterson ED, Kilgo P, et al. Off-pump techniques benefit men and women and narrow the disparity in mortality after coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(5):1447–54.
Puskas JD, Kilgo PD, Lattouf OM, Thourani VH, Cooper WA, Vassiliades TA, et al. Off-pump coronary bypass provides reduced mortality and morbidity and equivalent 10-year survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(4):1139–46.
Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Database: Spring Report 2009. Durham: Duke Clinical Research Institute; 2009.
Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, Collins JF, McDonald GO, Kozora E, et al. Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(19):1827–37.
Cooper WA, Corvera JS, Thourani VH, Puskas JD, Craver JM, Lattouf OM, et al. Perfusion-assisted direct coronary artery bypass provides early reperfusion of ischemic myocardium and facilitates complete revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(4):1132–9.
Mack MJ. Off-pump surgery and alternatives to standard operation in redo coronary surgery. J Card Surg. 2004;19(4):313–9.
Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, Flather M, Clague J, Davies S, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(1):21–8.
Di Mauro M, Iaco AL, Contini M, Teodari G, Vittolla G, Pano M, et al. Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of early and late outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:81–7.
Mishra YK, Collison SP, Malhotra R, Kohli V, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Ten-year experience with single-vessel and multivessel reoperative off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(3):527–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Myung, R.J., Puskas, J.D. (2012). Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Repeat Coronary Revascularization. In: Machiraju, V., Schaff, H., Svensson, L. (eds) Redo Cardiac Surgery in Adults. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1326-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1326-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1325-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1326-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)