Skip to main content

Introduction: The Social and Urban Scale of Heritage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
On Location

Abstract

One of the defining characteristics of cities is their spatial complexity. Whereas a monument can be cordoned off so that one passes through a defined entry to gain entrance, the thresholds of cities are inlaid in the very fabric of the city itself, the borders marking transitions without being separate from the very transition that they denote. We are usually conscious of passing from one zone to another – signaled by gates, bridges, or changes in architectural style – yet these elements are not separate from the neighborhood that they announce. In this way of understanding the space of the heritage city as porous and inhabited, the difference between the objectives of preservation and the objectives of heritage study is revealed. Both address a historic entity. But whereas preservation is specifically action oriented and focuses on a historic object usually defined as a monument or place, heritage study is less concerned with the act of preservation than its outcome with respect to social justice, triad of race/class/gender, economics of preservation management and tourism, and issues of identity and difference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashworth, G.J., Brian Graham, and J.E. Tunbridge 2007. Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. Pluto Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, Charles A. 1994. “Protecting Cultural Landscapes: Planning, Treatment and Management of Historic Landscapes,” Preservation Brief 36. United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington, DC. (http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/tps/briefs/brief36.htm)

  • Choay, Françoise 2001. The Invention of the Historic Monument, trans. Lauren O’Connell. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafstein, Valdimar 2009. “Intangible Heritage as a List: From Masterpieces to Representation,” pp. 93–111 in Laurajane Smith and Natsuko Akagawa, eds., Intangible Heritage. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, Matthew, ed. 2008. The Venice Charter Revisited: Modernism, Conservation and Tradition in the 21st Century. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara 2004. “Intangible Heritage as a Metacultural Production,” Museum International 56(1–2): 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCannell, Dean 1976. The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. Schocken Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Museum 2011. “Cronocaos. An exhibition by OMA / Rem Koolhaas” (http://www.newmuseum.org/exhibitions/441).

  • Orser, Charles 2007. “Transnational Diaspora and Rights of Heritage,” pp. 91–105, in Helaine Silverman and D. Fairchild Ruggles, eds. Cultural Heritage and Human Rights. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouroussoff, Nicolai 2011. “An Architect’s Fear That Preservation Distorts,” exhibition review in the New York Times, May 23 (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/24/arts/design/cronocaos-by-rem-koolhaas-at-the-new-museum.html).

  • Ruggles, D. Fairchild and Helaine Silverman, eds. 2009. Intangible Heritage Embodied. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpaci, Joseph 2005. Plazas and Barrios: Heritage Tourism and Globalization in the Latin American Centro Histórico. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Helaine, ed. 2010. Contested Heritage: Religion, Nationalism, Erasure, and Exclusion in a Global World. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Helaine and D. Fairchild Ruggles, eds. 2007. Cultural Heritage and Human Rights. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valderrama, Fernando 1995. A History of UNESCO. UNESCO Publishing, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitby-Last, Kathryn 2008. “Article 1 Cultural Landscape,” pp. 51–62 in Francisco Francioni and Federico Lenzerini, eds. The 1972 World Heritage Convention: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yúdice, George 2003. The Expediency of Culture: Uses of Culture in the Global Era. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. 2008. “Article 1 Definition of Cultural Heritage,” pp. 23–50 in Francisco Francioni and Federico Lenzerini, eds. The 1972 World Heritage Convention: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Heritage Documents Cited

  • International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation. The Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments, Athens, Greece, 1932 (Athens Charter 1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments (CATHM). The International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites, Venice, Italy, 1964 (adopted by ICOMOS as the Venice Charter 1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS. Resolutions on the Conservation of Smaller Historic Towns, Rothenburg ob der Tauber, Germany, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS Australia. The Australian ICOMOS Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance, Burra, Australia, 1979 (the Burra Charter 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS. Historic Gardens, Florence, Italy, 1982 (the Florence Charter 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS. Charter on the Conservation of Historic Towns and Urban Areas, Washington, DC, 1987 (the Washington Charter 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS. The Nara Document on Authenticity, Nara, Japan, 1994 (the Nara Document 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, Paris, France, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Recommendation Concerning the Safeguarding and Contemporary Role of Historic Areas, Nairobi, Kenya, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Paris, France, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, Paris, France, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. Vienna Memorandum on World Heritage and Contemporary Architecture – Managing the Historic Urban Landscape, Vienna, Austria, 2005 (The Vienna Memorandum 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (under review by states parties as of this writing)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Fairchild Ruggles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruggles, D.F. (2012). Introduction: The Social and Urban Scale of Heritage. In: Ruggles, D. (eds) On Location. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1108-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics