Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Operations Management in Community-Based Nonprofit Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community-Based Operations Research

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 167))

Abstract

Addressing the needs of underrepresented, underserved, and vulnerable populations at a local level is the central goal of many charitable nonprofit organizations, and is thus naturally intertwined with community-based operations research. Through promoting and creating positive change, such nonprofits play an integral role in their communities and affect individual lives. However, the research literature addressing nonprofit operations is limited. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce to the operations research/operations management audience the modeling and policy issues of nonprofit organizations, using the fundamental metaphor of the supply chain. As the supply-side (inputs), production, and demand-side (consumers, beneficiaries, etc.) are uncoupled, we review relevant operations research and nonprofit studies (social science) literature and identify potential future research in each area. This surveys primary contribution is cross-disciplinary understanding to support innovative theory-building, modeling, and solution development for nonprofit organizations and community-based operations research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, J., Brudney, J. L., & Yang, K. (2010). Symposium: Accountability and performance measurement: The evolving role of nonprofits in the hollow state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, A. (1996). Profits for nonprofits: find a corporate partner. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassopoulos, A. (1998). Decision support for target-based resource allocation of public services in multiunit and multilevel systems. Management Science, 44(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, Y., & Ramalho, N. (2006). Commonalities and distinctions in the measurement of organizational performance and effectiveness across for-profit and nonprofit sectors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucells, M., & Sarin, R. (2003). Group decisions with multiple criteria. Management Science, 49(8), 1105–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S., & Carlson, R. (1974). Multi-goal optimization in managerial science. Omega, 2(5), 607–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyaci, T., & Gallego, G. (2009). Supply chain coordination in a market with customer service competition. Production and Operations Management, 13(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brest, P., & Harvey, H. (2008). Money well spent: A strategic plan for smart philanthropy. New York: Bloomberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. In S. Graves & T. de Kok (Eds.), Supply chain management – Handbook in OR/MS ( Vol. 11.). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G., & Lariviere, M. (1999a). Capacity allocation using past sales: When to turn-and-earn. Management Science, 45(5), 685–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G., & Lariviere, M. (1999b). Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance. Management Science, 45(8), 1091–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman, J. (2009). Nonprofits, funders, and evaluation: Accountability in action. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(4), 374–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M., & Harrington, J. E., Jr. (2000). Centralization vs. decentralization in a multi-unit organization: A computational model of a retail chain as a multi-agent adaptive system. Management Science, 46(11), 1427–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, B., & Hardt, C. (2003). Purchasing lessons for schools. The McKinsey Quarterly, 4. http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com.

  • Cordes, J., & Rooney, P. (2004). Fundraising costs. In D. Young, (Ed.), Effective economic decision-making by nonprofit organizations. New York: National Center for Nonprofit Enterprise and The Foundation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Foundations. (2010). Those we serve. http://www.cof.org/.

  • Crama, P., De Reyck, B., & Degraeve, Z. (2008). Milestone payments or royalties? Contract design for R&D licensing. Operations research, 56(6), 1539–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vericourt, F., & Lobo, M. (2009). Resource and revenue management in nonprofit operations. Operations Research, 57(5), 1114–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76(1), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, S., & Mendelson, H. (1990). User delay costs and internal pricing for a service facility. Management Science, 36(12), 1502–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multicriteria optimization (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Stony Creek, CT: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhun, F. (2009). Collaborative procurement. In J. Cochran, L. Cox, Jr., P. Keskinocak, J. Kharoufeh, & J. Smith (Eds.), Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhun, F., & Keskinocak, P. (2007). Collaborative supply chain management. In K. Kempf, P. Keskinocak, & R. Uzsoy, (Eds.), Handbook of production planning. Kluwer International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabozzi, F., Kolm, P., Pachamanova, D., & Focardi, S. (2007). Robust portfolio optimization and management. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W., & Bradach, J. (2005). Should nonprofits seek profits? Harvard Business Review, 83(2), 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W., Kim, P., & Christiansen, B. (2009). Ten nonprofit funding models. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(2), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P. (2006). Strategic giving: The art and science of philanthropy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammal, D. (2007). Before you say “I Do”. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(3), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, N. (2002). Customer loyalty and supplier quality competition. Management Science, 48(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., Schaubert, S., & Babcock, E. (2008). Achieving breakthrough performance. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(3), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, A., & Rangan, V. (2001). Managing multisite nonprofits. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11(3), 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider, D. (2007). Uniting for survival. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(3), 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. Powell, (ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 27–42) ( 1st ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., Kriebel, C., & Raviv, A. (1982). Asymmetric information, incentives and intrafirm resource allocation. anagement Science, 28(6), 604–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, T., & Lybecker, K. (2005). The effect of the nonprofit motive on hospital competitive behavior. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, 4(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, B., & Dror, M. (2005). Allocation of gains from inventory centralization in newsvendor environments. IIE Transactions, 37(2), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., & Lynn, L. (2003). Producing human services: Why do agencies collaborate? Public Management Review, 5(1), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochbaum, D., & Levin, A. (2006). Methodologies and algorithms for group-rankings decision. Management Science, 52(9), 1394–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignizio, J. (1978). A review of goal programming: A tool for multiobjective analysis. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 29(11), 1109–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., & Smilowitz, K. (2007). Community-based operations research. In T. Klastorin, (ed.), Tutorials in operations research 2007. Hanover: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabuk, S., & Wu, S. (2005). Incentive schemes for semiconductor capacity allocation: A game theoretic analysis. Production and Operations Management, 14(2), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayis, E., Erhun, F., & Plambeck, E. (2009). Delegation vs. control of component procurement under asymmetric cost information and price-only contracts. Working paper, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, J., Knapp, M., & Forder, J. (2006). Social care and the nonprofit sector in the western developed world. In W. Powell, & R. Steinberg, (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 415–431) (2 nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskinocak, P., & Savasaneril, S. (2008). Collaborative procurement among competing buyers. Naval Research Logistics, 55(6), 516–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klamroth, K., & Miettinen, K. (2008). Integrating approximation and interactive decision making in multicriteria optimization. Operations Research, 56(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilaka, N., & Lin, L. (2006). Impact of licensing on investment and financing of technology development. Management Science, 52(12), 1824–1837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, M., & Porteus, E. (2001). Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, S. (2009). Foundations’ year-end outlook for giving and the sector. Research advisory, Foundation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, S. (2010). Moving beyond the economic crisis: Foundations assess the impact and their response. Research advisory, Foundation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Wang, Q. (2007). Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., & Kulatilaka, N. (2006). Network effects and technology licensing with fixed fee, royalty, and hybrid contracts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S., & McCardle, K. (1997). The competitive newsboy. Operations research, 45(1), 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Weinberg, C. (2004). Are nonprofits unfair competitors for businesses? An analytical approach. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 23(Spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallik, S., & Harker, P. (2000). Coordinating supply chains with competition: Capacity allocation in semiconductor manufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 159:330–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, M. (1991). Modelling effectiveness-equity trade-offs in public service delivery systems. Management Science, 37(4), 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, N. (2004). Privatizing the welfare state: Nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCardle, K., Rajaram, K., & Tang, C. (2009). A decision analysis tool for evaluating fundraising tiers. Decision Analysis, 6(1), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGurk, M. (2006). Peninsula Community Foundation and Community Foundation Silicon Valley vote unanimously to take next step toward merger. Announcement, Peninsula Community Foundation and Community Foundation of Silicon Valley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, E. (2007). Emmett Carson. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(3), 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flanagan, M., & Taliento, L. (2004). Nonprofits: Ensuring that bigger is better. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, S. (1996). Nonprofit organizations and their local affiliates: A study in organizational forms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 30(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W., & Owen-Smith, J. (1998). Universities as creators and retailers of intellectual property: Life-sciences research and commercial development. In B. Weisbrod, (ed.). To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prest, A., & Turvey, R. (1965). Cost-benefit analysis: A survey. The Economic Journal, 75(300), 683–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Privett, N. (2010). Operations management in the nonprofit sector. PhD thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Privett, N., & Erhun, F. (2010). Efficient funding: Auditing in the nonprofit sector. Working paper, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Sector Consultants (2009). Economic benefits of Michigan’s nonprofit sector. Technical report, Michigan Nonprofit Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachev, S., Stoyanov, S., & Fabozzi, F. (2008). Advanced stochastic models, risk assessment, and portfolio optimization: The ideal risk, uncertainty, and performance measures. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, M., & Reichelstein, S. (2004). A perspective on “Asymmetric information, incentives and intrafirm resource allocation”. Management Science, 50(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, S. (2004). The future of philanthropy: Economics, ethics, and management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (2005). A failure of philanthropy. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3(4), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, R., & Weinberg, C. (2003). Competition in the nonprofit sector: A strategic marketing framework. Working paper, University of Western Ontario and University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, A. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success – and how you can too. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, S., Sowa, J., & Sandfort, J. (2006). The impact of nonprofit collaboration in early child care and education on management and program outcomes. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 412–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherlock, M., & Gravelle, J. An overview of the nonprofit and charitable sector. (2009). Technical Report R40919, Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siino, R. (2003). The incredible shrinking donor base. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1(2), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., & Yankey, J. (1991). Organizational metamorphosis: A study of eighteen nonprofit mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 1(4), 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., & Gronbjerg, K. (2006). Scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 221–242) (2nd edn.). Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • So, K. C. (2000). Price and time competition for service delivery. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2(4), 392–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speckbacher, G. (2003). The economics of performance management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 13(3), 267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. (1986). The revealed objective functions of nonprofit firms. The Rand Journal of Economics, 17(4), 508–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. (2006). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research Handbook (p. 659) (2nd edn). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation, (89). Josey-Bass (Publisher).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavana, M. (2003). CROSS: A multicriteria group-decision-making model for evaluating and prioritizing advanced-technology projects at NASA. Interfaces, 33(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • The center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. (2010). Giving USA 2010: The annual report on philanthropy for the year of 2009. Executive summary, Giving USA Foundation, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A. A., & Agrawal, N. (2000). Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2(4), 372–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, H. (1998). Competition, commercialization and the emergence of nonprofit organizational structures. In B. Weisbrod (Ed.), To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernis, A., Iglesias, M., Sanz, B., & Saz-Carranza, A. (2006). Nonprofit organizations challenges and collaboration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. (1998). Modeling the nonprofit organization as a multiproduct firm: A framework for choice. In B. Weisbrod (Ed.), To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W., Jr., & Berman, E. (2001). Third sector management: The art of managing nonprofit organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, K., Roeger, K., & Pollak, T. (2010). The nonprofit sector in brief: Public charities, giving, and volunteering, 2010. Technical report, Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zaragoza Logistics Center, Zaragoza, Spain

    Natalie A. Privett

Authors
  1. Natalie A. Privett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie A. Privett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Public Policy & Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts, Boston, McCormack Hall, Boston, 02125-3393, Massachusetts, USA

    Michael P. Johnson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Privett, N.A. (2012). Operations Management in Community-Based Nonprofit Organizations. In: Johnson, M. (eds) Community-Based Operations Research. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 167. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0806-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation