Skip to main content

Hardness Complexity of Optimal Substructure Problems on Power-Law Graphs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Optimization in Complex Networks

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 57))

  • 2384 Accesses

Abstract

The remarkable discovery of many large-scale real networks is the power-law distribution in degree sequence: the number of vertices with degree i is proportional to i −β for some constant β>1. A lot of researchers believe that it may be easier to solve some optimization problems in power-law graphs. Unfortunately, many problems have been proved NP-hard even in power-law graphs as Ferrante proposed in Ferrante et al. (Theoretical Computer Science 393(1–3):220–230, 2008). Intuitively, a theoretical question is raised: Are these problems on power-law graphs still as hard as on general graphs? The chapter shows that many optimal substructure problems, such as minimum dominating set, minimum vertex cover and maximum independent set, are easier to solve in power-law graphs by illustrating better inapproximability factors. An optimization problem has the property of optimal substructure if its optimal solution on some given graph is essentially the union of the optimal subsolutions on all maximal connected components. In particular, the above problems and a more general problem (ρ-minimum dominating set) are proven to remain APX-hard and their constant inapproximability factors on general power-law graphs by using the cycle-based embedding technique to embed any d-bounded graphs into a power-law graph. In addition, the corresponding inapproximability factors of these problems are further proven in simple power-law graphs based on the graphic embedding technique as well as that of maximum clique and minimum coloring using the embedding technique in Ferrante et al. (Theoretical Computer Science 393 (1–3):220–230, 2008). As a result of these inapproximability factors, the belief that there exists some (1+o(1))-approximation algorithm for these problems on power-law graphs is proven not always true. In addition, this chapter contains the in-depth investigations in the relationship between the exponential factor β and constant greedy approximation algorithms. The last part includes some minor NP-hardness results on simple power-law graphs for small β<1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/data/erdos/erdos971.net Data of Erdös Collaboration Network in 1997

  2. Aiello, W., Chung, F., Lu, L.: A random graph model for massive graphs. In: STOC ’00, pp. 171–180. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aiello, W., Chung, F., Lu, L.: A random graph model for power law graphs. Experimental Math 10, 53–66 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabasi, A.L.: The diameter of the world wide web. Nature 401, 130–131 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alimonti, P., Kann, V.: Hardness of approximating problems on cubic graphs. In: CIAC ’97, pp. 288–298. Springer-Verlag, London, UK (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Austrin, P., Khot, S., Safra, M.: Inapproximability of vertex cover and independent set in bounded degree graphs. In: CCC ’09, pp. 74–80 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bianconi, G., Barabási, A.L.: Bose-einstein condensation in complex networks (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bondy, J., Murty, U.: Graph theory with applications. MacMillan London (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bornholdt, S., Schuster, H.G. (eds.): Handbook of Graphs and Networks: From the Genome to the Internet. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chlebík, M., Chlebíková, J.: Approximation hardness of dominating set problems in bounded degree graphs. Inf. Comput. 206(11), 1264–1275 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dinur, I., Safra, S.: On the hardness of approximating minimum vertex cover. Annals of Mathematics 162, 2005 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Erdos, P., Gallai, T.: Graphs with prescribed degrees of vertices. Mat. Lapok 11, 264–274 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eubank, S., Kumar, V.S.A., Marathe, M.V., Srinivasan, A., Wang, N.: Structural and algorithmic aspects of massive social networks. In: SODA ’04, pp. 718–727. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., Faloutsos, C.: On power-law relationships of the internet topology. In: Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication, SIGCOMM ’99, pp. 251–262. ACM, New York, NY, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrante, A., Pandurangan, G., Park, K.: On the hardness of optimization in power-law graphs. Theoretical Computer Science 393(1-3), 220–230 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gkantsidis, C., Mihail, M., Saberi, A.: Conductance and congestion in power law graphs. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 31(1), 148–159 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hastad, J.: Clique is hard to approximate within n 1 − ε. In: FOCS ’96, p. 627. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Janson, S., Luczak, T., Norros, I.: Large cliques in a power-law random graph (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kann, V.: On the Approximability of NP-complete Optimization Problems. Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., 07va Tardos: Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. In: IN ICALP, pp. 1127–1138. Springer Verlag (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, E.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: In KDD, pp. 137–146. ACM Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Norros, I., Reittu, H.: On a conditionally poissonian graph process. Advances in Applied Probability pp. 38–59 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pandurangan, G.: http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/gopal/powerlawtalk.pdf (2006)

  25. Redner, S.: How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 4(2), 131–134 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by NSF Career Award 0953284, DTRA; Young Investigator Award, Basic Research Program HDTRA1-09-1-0061; and DTRA HDTRA1-08-10.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yilin Shen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shen, Y., Nguyen, D.T., Thai, M.T. (2012). Hardness Complexity of Optimal Substructure Problems on Power-Law Graphs. In: Thai, M., Pardalos, P. (eds) Handbook of Optimization in Complex Networks. Springer Optimization and Its Applications(), vol 57. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0754-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics