Skip to main content

Abstract

Since the 1990s, the tar sands enterprise has evoked a collision of worldviews. At one extreme: proponents of the industry’s growth and the development of what they perceive as a valuable energy source that creates investment, jobs, taxes and royalties, with reparable or justifiable costs. At the other: critics alarmed at the socio-ecological disruption associated with the extraction and consumption of “dirty oil”, all for the sake of enriching vested interests. This chapter introduces the conceptual framework and analytical tools we use in this study to contemplate the nature, implications, and possible outcomes of this collision. Our goal is to understand better how certain courses of action with significant social and environmental consequence are justified or challenged. Such an analysis requires a close look at material realities: namely flows of money, labour, oil and waste. But even more so, it requires analysis of discursive representations and interpretations of those material realities and the complex global system through which information, ideas, materials and political power flow. Language and imagery embody the power of material consequence, and therefore, this study is first and foremost an analysis of discourse: the examination of meaning-making (New Keywords: A Revised Vocabulary of Culture and Society, 2005). In this book, we are interested in the discursive strategies used by politicians, corporate representatives and their critics in open debates, in carefully crafted political speeches or reports, and in web-based communications, to frame in words and images their behaviours and concerns, to portray imagined new actions, and preferred alternative futures (see Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, 2003; Critical Discourse Studies 1(1): 1–7, 2003 [cited in Urban Policy and Research 24(1): 39–52, 2006] and Urban Policy and Research 24(1): 39–52, 2006). Using NVivo qualitative data analysis software as well as an archival research methods, we have collected, coded, analysed and classified over two decades of public documents pertaining to tar sands development, including public hearing transcripts – particularly from the Oil Sands Consultations held in 2006–2007; transcripts of sessions of the Alberta Legislative Assembly provided by the publicly available Alberta Hansard database; as well as corporate-sponsored publications and documents; public speeches; impact assessment reports; newspaper articles and editorials; and organization websites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Alberta Advantage” was the Provincial slogan from 1994 until 2009. The new provincial slogan is “Freedom to create, spirit to achieve.”

  2. 2.

    On the social construction of museum exhibits see Dirks et al. (1994); Boswell and Evans (1999).

References

  • Alario, M. & Freudenburg, W.R. (2006). High-risk technology, legitimacy and science: the U.S. search for energy policy consensus. Journal of Risk Research 9(7):737–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R.D. (1993), Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces 71(3), 677–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. (1997). An Insider’s Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective. Sociological Inquiry 67(4),409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, T., Grossberg, L. & Morris, M. (Eds.). (2005). New Keywords: A Revised Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, F.L. (1977). The ruling class does not rule. Socialist Revolution 7(33), 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, D. & Evans, J. (Eds.). (1999). Representing the nation: a reader. Histories, Heritage and Museums. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, S.G. & Ciccantell, P.S. (2005). Globalization and the Race for Resources. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F.H. & Gould, K.A. (2004). Global social movement(s) at the crossroads: some observations on the trajectory of the anti-corporate globalization movement. Journal of World Systems Research 10(1), 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, H.M. (2004). A watershed of words: litigating and negotiating nature in Eastern James Bay, 1971-75. The Canadian Historical Review 85(1), 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2010 [1996]). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. & Braun, B. (2006). Constructing rural natures. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T., & Mooney, P. (Eds.). Handbook of Rural Studies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daub, S. (2010). Negotiating sustainability: climate change framing in the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union. Symbolic Interaction 33(1),115–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.J. & MacKendrick, N.A. (2004). All dressed up and nowhere to go: the discourse of ecological modernization in Alberta, Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 41(1), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, N., Eley, G. & Ortner, S. (Eds.). (1994). Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, M. & Perkins, C. (2009). The view from nowhere? spatial politics and cultural significance of satellite photography. Geoforum 40(4), 497–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2004). The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1996). Construction nature: elements for a post structuralist political ecology. Futures 28(4), 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (2000). Fighting marginalization with transnational networks: counter-hegemonic globalization. Contemporary Sociology 29(1), 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Every, D. & Augoustinos, M. (2007). Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers. Discourse and Society 18(4), 411–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N., Graham, P., Lemke, J., & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction. Critical Discourse Studies 1(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, F. (2007). Metaphor at work in the analysis of political discourse: investigating a ‘preventive war’ persuasion strategy. Discourse and Society 18(5), 603–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A. (1994). Fishing for Truth: A Sociological Analysis of northern cod stock assessments from 1977 to 1990. St. John’s: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, R. C. (1953). The Truth About Alberta Tar Sands: Why Were They Kept out of Production? Edmonton, Alberta. Pamphlet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedel, T. (2008). (Not so) crude text and images: staging Native in ‘big oil’ advertising. Visual Studies 23(3), 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W.R. (2006). Environmental degradation, disproportionality, and the double diversion: reaching out, reaching ahead, and reaching beyond. Rural Sociology 71(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W.R. (2005). Privileged access, privileged accounts: toward a socially structured theory of resources and discourses. Social Forces 84(1), 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W.R. & Alario, M. (2007). Weapons of mass distraction: magicianship, misdirection, and the dark side of legitimation. Sociological Forum 22(2), 146–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W.R., Gramling, R., & Davidson, D.J. (2008). Scientific Uncertainty Argumentation Methods (SCAMs): science and the politics of doubt. Sociological Inquiry 78(1), 2–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frickel, S. & Davidson, D.J. (2004). Building environmental states: legitimacy and rationalization in sustainability governance. International Sociology 19(1), 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabara, E. (2006). Recycled photographs: moving still images of Mexico City, 1950-2000. In Schwartz, M.E. & Tierney-Tello, M.B. (Eds.), Photography and Writing in Latin America: Double Exposures. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1966). Religion as a cultural system. In Banton, M. (Ed.), Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. & Marvin, S. (1996). Telecommunications and the City. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greider, T. & Garkovich, L. (1994). Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology 59(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Ypsilanti: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M.A. & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmentalpolitics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7(3), 175–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M.A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (2002). The west and the rest: discourse and power. In Shech, S. & Haggis, J. (Eds.), Development: A Cultural Studies Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan, J.A. (1995). Environmental Sociology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan, J.A. (2006). Environmental Sociology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariman, R. & Luciates, J.L. (2007). No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, G. (1955). Athabasca tar sands. A photographic essay. The Beaver. Winnipeg: Hudson’s Bay Company. (1955), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, K. (2006). Discourse analysis and its utility for urban policy research. Urban Policy and Research 24(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, R. & Sobieraj, S. (2007). Narrative, public policy, and political legitimacy: congressional debates about the nonprofit sector, 1894-1969. Sociological Theory 25(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazuka, A. (2006). Communicative intention in George W. Bush’s presidential speeches and statements from 11 September 2001 to 11 September 2003. Discourse and Society 17(3), 299–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1989). Legitimation durch Verfahren. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1993). The Sources of Social Power, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mohai, P. & Saha, R. (2006). Reassessing racial and socioeconomic disparities in environmental justice research. Demography 43(2), 383–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollé, F. (2007). Sacred cows, storylines and nirvana concepts: insights from the water sector. Paper presented at World Water Week, Special Session on Water, Politics and Development. Stockholm, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, M. (2004). Pitfalls of emancipation and discourses of security: reflections on Canada’s ‘security with a human face.’ International Relations 18(1), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. (1998). Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. (1988). The second contradiction of capitalism. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism (1):11–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, L. (1976). The Tar Sands: Syncrude and the Politics of Oil. Edmonton: Hurtig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M., Sherman, J. & Gismondi, M. (1993). Winning Back the Words: Confronting Experts in an Environmental Public Hearing. Toronto: Garamond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2007). Creating state legitimacy: the five basic models. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago Aug 28-Sept 2. http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/intellectual_life/rothstien_creating_state_legitimacy.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011.

  • Schwartz, J. (2003). More than ‘competent descriptions of an intractably empty landscape’: a strategy for critical engagement with historical photographs. Historical Geography 31.105–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. & Kern, F. (2007). The transitions discourse in the ecological modernisation of the Netherlands. SPRU (Science & Technology Policy Research), University of Sussex, UK. Paper for the Earth Systems Governance conference in Amsterdam, 24-26 May. http://www.2007amsterdamconference.org/Downloads/AC2007_SmithKern.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011.

  • Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B. Jr., Worden, S.K., & Benford, R.D. (1986). Frame alignment ­processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51(4):464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenhav, S.R. (2005). Concise narratives: A structural analysis of political discourse. Discourse Studies 7(3), 315–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C. & Wright, S. (1997). Policy: a new field of anthropology. In Shore, C. & Wright, S. (Eds.). Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1991). Aids and its Metaphors. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.H. (1998). Forging the Prairie West: The Illustrated History of Canada. Toronto: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2000). Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2010). Consuming the Planet to Excess. Theory, Culture & Society 27(2–3),191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J. (2006 [1991]). The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Orig pub in Dutch: 1991. De Netwerkmaatschappij: Sociale aspecten van nieuwe media. Bohn Stafleu en van Loghum, Houten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitalis, R. (2009). America’s Kingdom: Mythmaking on the Saudi Oil Frontier. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Fels, J. (1992). The Power of Maps. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra J. Davidson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davidson, D.J., Gismondi, M. (2011). Observing Global Flows. In: Challenging Legitimacy at the Precipice of Energy Calamity. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0287-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics