Summary
In “The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology” (1986), John Dewey gives a reconstruction of the reflex arc concept which forms the starting point of a ‘transactional paradigm’ which is fundamental for all aspects of Dewey’s work. In this article we start with a reconstruction of Dewey’s paradigm. Next we show that Bowlby’s attachment theory fits very well within such a transactional paradigm because it is based on ethology. A closer analysis, however, shows that the place of the mental in attachment theory is not completely consistent with the evolutionary assumptions of the transactional paradigm, and it is suggested that this problem can be solved from a Deweyan perspective.
Research for this article by the first author is supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (N.W.O.).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, Th. M. (1987). John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience and Nature: The Horizons of Feeling. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Bernstein, R. J. (1966). John Dewey. New York: Washington Square Press.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and Loss. Volume I: Attachment, (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base. Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory. London: Routledge.
Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment Theory: Retrospect and Prospect. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for the Research of Child Development, 50, (1–2, Serial No. 209), 3–37.
Coughlan, N. (1973). Young John Dewey. An Essay in American Intellectual History. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1884). The New Psychology. EWl:48–60.
Dewey, J. (1887). Ethics and Physical Science. EWl:205–226.
Dewey, J. (1896). The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology. EW5:96–110.
Dewey, J. (1896). Educational Psychology: Syllabus of a Course of Twelve Lecture-Studies. EW5:304–327.
Dewey, J. (1906). The Terms ‘Conscious’ and ‘Consciousness’. MW3:79–82.
Dewey, J. (1929). The Quest for Certainty. LW4.
Dewey, J. (1930). Conduct and Experience. LW5:218–235.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.
Dewey, J. & Bentley, A. F. (1960/1949). Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon Press.
Eisenga, L. K. A. (1973). Structuralisme, functionalisme en behaviorisme. De gedachte van een behavioristische revolutie in de psychologie. (Structuralism, functionalism, and behaviorism. The idea of a behavioristic revolution in psychology). Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit (diss.).
Flugel, J. C. (1964). A Hundred Years of Psychology, 1833–1933. New York: Basic Books.
Hahn, L. E. (1969). Introduction. From Intuitionalism to Absolutism. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey. The Early Works, 1882–1898. Volume 1: 1882–1888, (pp. vii–xxi). Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Hinde, R.A. (1982a). Ethology. Its nature and relations with other sciences. London: Fontana.
Hinde, R. A. (1982b). Attachment: Some Conceptual and Biological Issues. In C. M. Parkes & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), The Place of Attachment in Human Behavior, (pp. 60–76). New York: Basic Books.
Langfeld, H. S. (1943). Jubilee of the Psychological Review: Fifty Volumes of the Psychological Review. Psychological Review, 50, 143–155.
Leahey, Th. H. (1987). A History of Psychology. Main currents in psychological thought. (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
McKenzie, W. R. (1975). Introduction. Toward Unity of Thought and Action. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey. The Early Works, 1882–1989. Volume 5: 1895–1898, (pp. ix–xvi). Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Murphy, G. (1961). “Some Reflections on John Dewey’s Psychology”. In University of Colorado Studies. Series in Philosophy, No. 2, pp. 26–34. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
Natsoulas, Th. (1983). Concepts of Consciousness. The Journal of Mind and Behaviour, 4(1), 13–59.
Phillips, D. C. (1971). James, Dewey, and the Reflex Arc. Journal of the History of Ideas, 32, 555–568.
Sleeper, R.W. (1986). The Necessity of Pragmatism. John Dewey’s Conception of Philosophy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Smith, A. K. (1973). Dewey’s Transition Piece: The Reflex Arc Paper. Tulane Studies in Philosophy, XXII, 122–141.
Titchener, E. B. (1898). “The Postulates of a Structural Psychology. The Psychological Review, 5, 449–465.
Verbeek, Th. (1977). Inleiding tot de geschiedenis van de psychologie. (Introduction to the history of psychology.) Utrecht/Antwerpen: Het Spectrum.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Biesta, G.J.J., Miedema, S., van IJzendoorn, M.H. (1990). John Dewey’s Reconstruction of the Reflex-Arc Concept and its Relevance for Bowlby’s Attachment Theory. In: Baker, W.J., Hyland, M.E., van Hezewijk, R., Terwee, S. (eds) Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9688-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9688-8_19
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97311-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9688-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive