Skip to main content
  • 63 Accesses

Abstract

The fragmented nature of Germany in past centuries has produced uniformity of growth in that country’s dispersed towns. Despite attempts at centralization in recent centuries (Frederick the Great in the 18th century, the German Confederation and Bismarck in the 19th century, and the Third Reich in the 20th century), the cities have preserved their own autonomy. Today the Federal Republic still possesses an urban network (1) with a very clear individual division of functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Koschnick, Unser Ziel: die menschliche Stadt, in Neue Heimat, 6, 1973, pp. 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Bundt & H. Roosch, Sanieren, aber wie ? GEWOS-Schriftenreihe, 6, 1972, p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Schmidt-Relenberg, et al., Sanierung und Sozialplan. Mittbestimmung gegen Sozialtechnik, Gallwey, 1973, p. 139. W. Dannebom, Art und Umfang vorbereitender Untersuchungen nach Städtebauförderungsgesetz, in Bauwelt, 37, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. H. Ernst & W. Wolff, Stadtsanierung, Hauserneuerung, Stuttgart, 1972, pp. 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.L.Dehaene, L.Huyse, L.Van Outryve, Machtsgroepen in de samenleving, Lejuven, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bureau De Programmation Economique, Les grandes lignes du Plan 1971–1975, Bruxelles, 1971, p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Tanghe, Planning in Belgium, in Town and Country Planning, 1974, p.277.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.Van Naelten, Ma kroplan ologische systeem regeling, Leuven, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.Cali fice, Ruimtelijke ordering en huisvesting 1980 horizon, Ministerie van Openbare Werken, 1974, pp. 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mens En Ruimte a. s. b. l. Grondbeleid, Ministerie van Openbare Werken, Brüssel, 1973. Also contains an assessment of land policy in the following countries: Federal Republic of Germany, France, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and some non-Community countries.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Hoeffler, La mutation du régime fonder, Bruxelles, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zones and sites of cultural, historic and/or aesthetic interest. “In these zones, any change is subject to special conditions resulting from the interests of conservation” (Article 5 of the Royal Decree of 28 December 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Interenvironnement- Bond Beter Leefmilieu, Principes pour l’aménagement démocratique de l’agglomération bruxelloise, Bruxelles, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cultuurraad Voor De Nederlandstalige Cultuurgemeenschap, Ontwerp van decreet tot bescherming van monumenten en landschappen, Brussel, 1973, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Svarre, Twelve years of national planning. A retrospective assessment, in Byplan, special issue, 1973, pp. 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Secretariat Of The National Planning Committee, Danish National Planning. Present State and Future Prospects, Copenhagen, 1972, pp. 49–50.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boligministeriets Kommiterede I Byplan Sager, Betragtningen over Saner ingsbehavet I Danmark, Kobenhavn, 1973, pp. 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Conseil Economique Et Social Des Nations Unies, Aspects économiques de la renovation urbaine, Genève, 1974, annexe p. l.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V.R. Nielsen, Evaluation of recent trends in metropolitan planning in Denmark, in The Mastery of Urban Growth, Mens en Ruimte, Brussels, 1971, pp. 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F.Larsen, Debate on Town Centers, in Byplan, special issue, 1973, pp. 21–25. Ministry Of Housing, Danish Memorandum… on Methods for improving the quality and efficiency of urban renewal, 1971, pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Danish Town Planning Laboratory, Town Planning Guide, Copenhagen, 1973, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Synthèse des modalités de financement, pamphlets published by the Ministry of Equipment, Paris, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Code de l’Urbanisme, special section of the Bulletin Officiel, n° 73–91 bis, 8 nov. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Protection du patrimoine historique et esthétique de la France, Journal Officiel, recueil des textes, 1 septembre 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.B#, Le cadre de vie et la conservation des centres anciens, in Urbanisme, 136, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Sudreau, Instruction générale du 8–11-1959 sur la rénovation urbaine.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Coing, Rénovation urbaine et changement social, Paris, 1966, p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. Archer, La rénovation urbaine pervertie, in Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, nov. 1973, 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  29. O. Guichard, Nouvelles orientations de la politique urbaine. Address to the National Assembly as Minister for Physical Planning, Equipment, Housing and Tourism, Paris, 17 mai 1973, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Prefecture De Paris, Communication de M. le préfet de Paris au Conseil de Paris sur la Rénovation Urbaine, Paris, 20 décembre 1973, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  31. S.D.A.U.: Schéma directeur d’aménagement et d’urbanisme. P.O.S.: Plan d’occupation du sol.

    Google Scholar 

  32. B.Kayser, Une politique des villes moyennes, in Urbanisme, n° 36, 1973, pp. 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Delion, Institutions sociales et Aménagement du territoire. Report to the Government, Paris, 1974, p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  34. L.A. Menard, Administrations centrales et Aménagement du territoire, Paris, 1974, p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Office Location in Ireland: The Role of Central Dublin, An Foras Forbartha, Dublin 1973, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibidem, p.61.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Office Location in Ireland: The Role of Central Dublin, op cit. p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M.Wright, The Dublin Region: Advisory Report and Final Report, Government of Ireland, Dublin, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute, Vol 60, No 1, January 1964, p. 523.

    Google Scholar 

  40. UNESCO, Economic Commission for Europe, Committee on Housing, Building and Planning, Country Monographs prepared for the Inquiry into Regiona Physical Planning, ST/ECE/HOU/25, January 1967, pp. 82–84.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See F.Benvenuti, M.S.Giannini and A.Predieri, Aspetti giù ridi dell’intervento pubblico, pp. 131–154 and G.BERSANO, La legislazione italiana sui centri storici, (Sezione di Milano di Italia Nostra) pp. 204–223, in L’intervento pubblico nei centri storici, Atti del Convengo Gescal, Venezia, 11–12 maggio 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. Predieri, L’espropriazioni di immobili nei centri storici per l’edilizia residenziale publica, secondo legge n. 865del 1971, in p. l.CERVELLATI, and R.SCANNAVINI, Bologna: politica e metodologia del restauro nei centri storici, Bologna, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  43. S. Lenci, L’intervento pubblico nei centri storici, op. cit,, p.194.

    Google Scholar 

  44. L. Testa, L’intervento pubblico. ibidem, p.40.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Benvenuti, L’intervento pubblico. ibidem, pp.151–152.

    Google Scholar 

  46. L.Quaroni, L’intervento pubblico. ibidem, p.180.

    Google Scholar 

  47. p. l.Cervellati, L’intervento pubblico. ibidem, p.73.

    Google Scholar 

  48. There is no national plan attaching any importance to the urban fabric. Regional plans such as the Plan for the Mezzogiorno have made possible the development of centres like Naples and Palermo, but migration from rural areas and small communities to the more developed centres in the north and middle of the country - Milan, Turin, Rome, Genoa and Venice - continues. (See UNESCO, op. cit., p.81 and F.BRIATICO, L’intervento pubblico. ibidem, pp. 228–229).

    Google Scholar 

  49. F.Briatico, pp. 20–22, p. l.Cervellati, pp. 70–73, B.SECCHI, p.165, L’intervento pubblico.. op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  50. P.Briatico, Il problema dei centri storici e l’intervento della Gescal, pp.225–242, and p. l.Cervellati, pp.72 and 75, L’intervento pubblico…, ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  51. T. Bendixon, Transport policy in three cities in Italy, in Town and Country Planning, London, December 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  52. F.Orsenigo, L’interventopubblico. op. cit., p.47.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ministers Schaefer and Gruiyters, Naareen wet op de stadsvernieuwing, 1974, p. xx.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stadsvernieuwing, first report of the study commission on the financial consequences of urban rehabi-litation and reconstruction, 21 July 1971 (2nd session of the Chamber, 1971–1972, No. 11,634), Staatsuitgeverij, s’Gravenhage, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Naar een wet op de stadsvernieuwing, (session of the Chamber 1973–1974, No 12,790), Staatsuitgeverij, s’Gravenhage, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Orienteringsnota ruimteUjke ordering, Eerste Deel van de Derde Nota over Ruimtelijke Ordening, s’Gravenhage, 1974, p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tweede Nota over de RuimteUjke Ordening in Nederland, s’Gravenhage, 1966, p.86.

    Google Scholar 

  58. De grote stad ais probleemgebied, Directorates of the Urban Development Departments of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague and Utrecht, Amsterdam, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wat doen we met Den Haag ? in s’Gravenhage, special issue on the problem of the viability of the city, s’Gravenhage, sept. 1973. Ontwikkeling noordelijkeDelta Plan 2000 +, published by the city of Rotterdam, 1969. F.R.Harris and Associated Industrial Consultants, The Greater Delta Region, Rotterdam, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Economic Progress Report, December 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  61. J.Holliday (ed.), City Centre Redevelopment, Charles Knight, London, 1973, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  62. City Centre Redevelopment, ibid., p. 16. The Government has recently brought in a new tax on profits realized on land development and has tabled a bill in Parliament which would bring land earmarked for development or redevelopment into community ownership. In addition, the Government has announced proposals for new regulations on taxes on development projects, and also measures which would enable local authorities to acquire land at prices exempt from tax.

    Google Scholar 

  63. City Centre Redevelopment, op. cit., Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  64. J.B. Cullingsworth, Town and Country Planning in England and Wales, George Allen and Unwin, 3rd edition, London, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  65. The National Trust, Central Office of Information, London (SN 5931 ), July 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  66. The National Trust, Central Office of Information, London (SIM 5931 ), July 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  67. The National Trust, Central Office of Information, London (SIM 5931 ), July 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  68. The National Trust, Central Office of Information, London (SIM 5931 ), July 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mens en Ruimte. (1978). Analysis by Country of City-Centre Policy. In: Environmental Problems of the City Centres. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4099-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4099-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-207-0863-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4099-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics