Skip to main content

On the Complexity of a Column Generation Algorithm for Convex or Quasiconvex Feasibility Problems

  • Chapter
Large Scale Optimization

Abstract

We analyze the convergence and the complexity of a potential reduction column generation algorithm for solving general convex or quasiconvex feasibility problems defined by a separation oracle. The oracle is called at the analytic center of the set given by the intersection of the linear inequalities which are the previous answers of the oracle. We show that the algorithm converges in finite time and is in fact a fully polynomial approximation algorithm, provided that the feasible region has an nonempty interior. This result is based on the works of Ye [22] and Nesterov [16].

The research of the first author is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, grant number OPG0004152 and by the FCAR of Quebec; the research of the second author is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant number OPG0090391; the research of the third author is supported by NSF grant DDM-9207347.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Agmon (1954), “The Relaxation Method for Linear Inequalities,” Canadian Journal of Mathematics 6, 382–392.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. D. S. Atkinson and P. M. Vaidya (1992), A Cutting Plane Algorithm that uses Analytic Centers, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. V. Burke, A. A. Goldstein, P. Tseng, and Y. Ye (1993), “Translation Cuts for Minimization,” Complexity in Numerical Optimization (Editor: P. M. Pardalos ), World Scientific, 57–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. G. B. Dantzig and P. Wolfe (1961), “The Decomposition Algorithm for Linear Programming,” Econometrica 29, 767–778.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Elzinga and T. Moore (1975), “A Central Cutting Plane Algorithm for Convex Programming,” Mathematical Programming 8, 134–145.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. J. L. Goffin (1980), “The Relaxation Method for Solving Systems of Linear Inequalities,” Mathematics of Operations Research 5, 388–414.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. J. L. Goffin, A. Haurie, and J. P. Vial (1992), “Decomposition and Nondiffer- entiable Optimization with the Projective Algorithm,” Management Science 38, 284–302.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. J. E. Kelley (1960), “The Cutting Plane Method for Solving Convex Programs,” Journal of the SIAM 8, 703 - 712.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. L. G. Khacian (1980), “Polynomial Algorithms in Linear Programming,” Zh. vy- chisl. Mat. mat. Fiz, 20, No. 1 (1980) 51-68; translated in USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 20, No. 1, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. G. Khacian and M. J. Todd (1990), “On the Complexity of Approximating the Maximal Inscribed Ellipsoid for a Polytope,” Tech. Report No. 893, SORIE, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Lemaréchal, A. Nemirovskii and Y. Nesterov, “New Variants of Bundle Methods” to appear in Mathematical Programming, series B, Nondifferentiable and Large Scale Optimization, J. L. Goffin and J. P. Vial, editors.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Levin (1965), “An Algorithm of Minimization of Convex Functions,” Soviet Math 160, 6, 1244–1247. Doklady.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. E. Mitchell (1988), “Karmarkar’s Algorithm and Combinatorial Optimization Problems,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of ORIE, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Motzkin and I. J. Schoenberg (1954), “The Relaxation Method for Linear Inequalities,” Canadian Journal of Mathematics 6, 393–404.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Nemirovsky and D. Yudin (1983), Problem Complexity and Method Efficiency in Optimization, Wiley-Interscience, NY.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Nesterov (1992), Cutting Plane Algorithms from Analytic Centers: Efficiency Estimates, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Renegar (1988), “A Polynomial-time Algorithm Based on Newton’s Method for Linear Programming”, Mathematical Programming 40, 59–94.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Z. Shor (1985), Minimization Methods for Non-Differentiable Functions, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Sonnevend (1988), “New Algorithms in Convex Programming Based on a Notion of “Centre” (for Systems of Analytic Inequalities) and on Rational Extrapolation,” in K. H. Hoffmann, J. B. Hiriat-Urruty, C. Lemarechal, and J. Zowe, editors, “Trends in Mathematical Optimization,” Proceedings of the 4th French- German Conference on Optimization in Irsee, West-Germany, April 1986, International Series of Numerical Mathematics 84, 311–327. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Tarasov, L. G. Khachiyan, I. Erlich (1988), “The Method of Inscribed Ellipsoids,” Soviet Math 37, Doklady.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Vaidya (1989), “A New Algorithm for Minimizing Convex Functions over Convex Sets,”to appear in Mathematical Programming.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Ye (1992), “A Potential Reduction Algorithm Allowing Column Generation,” SIAM Journal on Optimization 2, 7 - 20.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Ye, “Convergence of a Potential-Reduction and Column-Generation Algorithm for Convex Feasibility Problems,” Working Paper, Department of Management Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goffin, JL., Luo, ZQ., Ye, Y. (1994). On the Complexity of a Column Generation Algorithm for Convex or Quasiconvex Feasibility Problems. In: Hager, W.W., Hearn, D.W., Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Large Scale Optimization. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3632-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3632-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3634-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3632-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics