Skip to main content

Restarting Strategies for the DQA Algorithm

  • Chapter
Large Scale Optimization

Abstract

A scenario-based decomposition algorithm is proposed for large stochastic pro-grams. The subproblem clusters consisting of separable quadratic programs are solved by means of a nonlinear interior point algorithm. Critical implementation issues are analyzed, including restarting and alternative splitting strategies. The approach is suited to a distributed multicomputer such as a network of workstations. Testing with several large LPs (117,000 constraints and 276,000 variables) shows the efficiency of the concepts.

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation CCR-9102660 and U.S.Air Force AFOSR-91-0359. Also acknowledgement are Scientific Conputing Associates who supplied the network-Linda sorfware.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Beguelin, J. Dongarra, A. Geist, R. Manchek, and V. Sunderam (1991), “A Users’ Guide to PVM Parallel Virtual Machine,” Technical Report ÓRNL/TM- 11826, Engineering Physics and Mathematics Division, Mathematical Sciences Section, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. J. Berger, J. M. Mulvey, and A. Ruszczynski (1993), “A Distributed Scenario Decomposition Algorithm for Large Stochastic Programs,” Technical Report SOR 93 - 2, Department of Civil Engineering and Operations Research, Princeton University, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. P. Bertsekas (1982), Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods, Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. J. R. Birge, M. A. H. Dempster, H. Gassmann, E. Gunn, A. J. King, S. W. Wallace (1987), “A Standard Input Format For Multiperiod Stochastic Linear Programs,” Working Paper WP-87-118, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. R. Cariño, T. Kent, D. H. Myers, C. Stacy, M. Sylvanus, A. L. Turner, K. Watanabe, and W. T. Ziemba (May 1993), “Russell-Yasuda Kasai model: An asset/liability model for a Japanese insurance company using multistage stochastic programming,” Presented at the ORS A/TIMS Joint National Meeting in Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Carriero and D. Gelernter (1989), “Linda in Context,” Commun. ACM 32, 444–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. B. Dantzig and G. Infanger (1991), “Large-Scale Stochastic Linear Programs: Importance Sampling and Benders Decomposition,” Report SOL 91 - 4, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu. Ermoliev and R. J.-B. Wets, eds (1988), Numerical Methods in Stochastic Programming, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. M. Freund (1991), “A Potential Reduction Function Algorithm for Solving a Linear Program from an Infeasible Warm Start,” Mathematical Programming 51, 441–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. R. Grauer and N. H. Hakansson (1986), “A Half Century of Returns on Levered and Unlevered Portfolios of Stocks, Bonds, and Bills, with and without Small Stocks,” Journal of Business 59 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. L. Higle and S. Sen (1991), “Stochastic Decomposition: An Algorithm for Stage Linear Programs with Recourse,” Mathematics of Operations Research 16, 650–669.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kojima, N. Megiddo, and S. Mizuno (December 1991), “A Primal-Dual Exterior Point Algorithm for Linear Programming,” Research Report RJ 8500, IBM AlmadĂ©n Research Center, San Jose, CA 95120-6099, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Kusy, and W. Ziemba (1986), “A Bank Asset Liability Model,” Operations Research 34, 356–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. I. J. Lustig, R. E. Marsten and D. F. Shanno (1992), “On Implementing Mehrotra’s Predictor-Corrector Interior Point Method for Linear Programming,” SIAM J. Optimization 2, 435–449.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. I. J. Lustig, J. M. Mulvey, and T. J. Carpenter (1991), “Formulating Two-Stage Stochastic Programs for Interior Point Methods,” Operations Research 39, 757–770.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. J. M. Mulvey (1992), “Incorporating Transaction Costs in Models for Asset Allocation,” in: Financial Optimization, S. Zenios (ed. ), Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. M. Mulvey and A. Ruszczyñski (1992), “A Diagonal Quadratic Approximation Method for Large Scale Linear Programs,” Operations Research Letters 12, 205–215.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. Mulvey and A. Ruszczynski (1992), “A New Scenario Decomposition Method for Large-Scale Stochastic Optimization,” Technical Report SOR 91–19, Department of Civil Engineering and Operations Research, Princeton University, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. M. Mulvey and H. Vladimirou (1992), “Stochastic Network Programming for Financial Planning Problems,” Management Science 38, 1642–1664.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Stephanopoulos and W. Westerberg (1975), “The Use of Hestenes’ Method of Multipliers to resolve Dual Gaps in Engineering System Optimization,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 15, 285–309.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. V. S. Sunderam (1990), “PVM: A Framework for Parallel Distributed Computing,” Concurrency: Practice and Experience 2, 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. J. Vanderbei and T. J. Carpenter (1991), “Symmetric Indefinite Systems for Interior-Point Methods,” Technical Report SOR 91 - 7, Department of Civil Engineering and Operations Research, Princeton University, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. J. Vanderbei (1991), “Symmetric Quasi-Definite Matrices,” Technical Report SOR 91–10, Department of Civil Engineering and Operations Research, Princeton University, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. J. Vanderbei (1992), “LOQO User’s Manual,” Technical Report SOR 92 - 5, Department of Civil Engineering and Operations Research, Princeton University, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berger, A.J., Mulvey, J.M., RuszczyƄski, A. (1994). Restarting Strategies for the DQA Algorithm. In: Hager, W.W., Hearn, D.W., Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Large Scale Optimization. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3632-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3632-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3634-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3632-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics