Skip to main content

Are Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions Unified?

  • Chapter
Particles and Fields 2
  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

I should like to take a somewhat different and more sceptical view of the world than most of the lecturers here. You have already heard much about the successes of renormalizable gauge theories and grand unified and super symmetric schemes: my viewpoint is much narrower. I wish to concentrate on the standard electroweak model, and to ask the questions ‘how well do we know that it agrees with experiment and in particular, are we really sure that weak and electromagnetic interactions are unified?’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. S. Gershtein and Ya. B. Zeldovich, JETP 29, 698 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. C. G. Sudarshan and R. E. Marshak, Contribution to the Conference on the Physics of Mesons and New Particles, Padua 1957; Phys. Rev. 109, 1860 (1958).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. P. Feynman and M. Geli-Mann, Phys. Rev. 109, 193 (1958).

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. J. Sakurai, Nuovo Cimento 7, 649 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Schwinger, Ann. Phys. 2, 407 (1957).

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 10, 107 (1959).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Salam and J. Ward, Nuovo Cimento 11, 568 (1959).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. S. A. Bludman, Nuovo Cimento 9, 443 (1958).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Geli-Mann and S. L. Glashow, Ann. Phys. 15, 437 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Coleman and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 23 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D2, 1285 (1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. 133, 173 (1971); B35, 167 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Hasert et al., Phys. Lett. 46B, 138 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. E. Kim, P. Langacker, M. Levine and H.H. Williams, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 211 (1981); F. Buesser, Proceedings Neutrino 81, Hawaii 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Q. Hung and J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Lett. 63B, 295 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Bailin and N. Dombey, Nature 271, 20 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. F. Abbott and R. M. Barnett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1303 (1978); E. Karantsoulis, Weak Pion Production, University of Sussex Thesis, 1980.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Prescott et al., Phys. Lett. 77B, 347 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. N. Fortson and L. Wilets, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 16, 319 (1980); Proceedings of 7th Vavilov Conference on Non-linear Optics, Novosibirsk 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.D. Bjorken, Contribution in the First Ben Lee Memorial International Conference on Parity Conservation, Weak Neutral Currents and Gauge Theories, Batavia, 1977. SLAC- PUB-2-62, December 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P.Q. Hung and J.J. Sakurai, Nucl. Phys. B143, 81 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Bernstein and T.D. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett, 11, 512 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. J.D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D19, 335 (1979).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Ericson and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. B133, 130 (1964); G. Feinberg, Phys. Rev. B134, 1295 (1964); T. Appelquist and T. Goldman, Phys. Rev. D6, 2048 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. Dombey, Proceedings of Neutrino 79, ed. A. Haatuft and C. Jarlskog, Bergen 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Sakakibara, Dortmund Preprint DO-TH 80 /10, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Cole, Renormalization of the Standard Electroweak Theory, University of Sussex Thesis, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Bailin, Phys. Rev. 135, B166 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  31. W. Kummer and G. Segre, Nucl. Phys. 64, 585 (1965).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Nolle, J.H. Reid and L. Schulke, Phhs. Lett. 56B, 57 (1975).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. That a dispersion relation for a three-point function in a non-Abelian theory would need a subtraction was pointed out by N. Dombey and A.D. Kennedy, Phys. Let. t 91B, 428 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  34. L.D. Landau, A.A. Abrikosov and I.M. Khalatnikov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 95, 773 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dombey, N. (1983). Are Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions Unified?. In: Capri, A.Z., Kamal, A.N. (eds) Particles and Fields 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3593-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3593-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3595-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3593-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics