Abstract
In their important 1978 paper, Kayne & Pollock argue that Stylistic Inversion in French provides independent evidence for the successive cyclic movement hypothesis argued for in Chomsky (1977) and references cited there, on the basis of island phenomena. Bresnan (1975) and Grimshaw (1975), on the other hand, show that both in the comparative construction in Modern English and in relative clauses in Chaucerian English, the successive cyclic wh-movement hypothesis runs into trouble and that in these constructions, unbounded deletion should be allowed. Nevertheless, both comparative subdeletion and presumably relativization in Chaucerian English obey the “island” constraints that the successive cyclic wh-movement hypothesis was meant to explain. The same state of affairs obtains in Irish, according to the analysis given in McCloskey (1979), in Kikuyu as argued in Clements (1979), in Old English (Allen (1977)), and Old Icelandic (Maling (1976)).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Communication and Cognition
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zaenen, A. (1983). Verb-First Clauses in Icelandic, Successive Cyclic wh-Movement and Syntactic Binding. In: Tasmowski, L., Willems, D. (eds) Problems in Syntax. Studies in Language. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2727-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2727-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9691-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2727-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive