Skip to main content

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Fifty Years Later

  • Chapter
Fundamental Processes in Atomic Collision Physics

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSB,volume 134))

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide an introduction to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox which, in recent times, has developed into a theorem of incompatibility between the empirical predictions of quantum theory and the assumption that our universe can be analyzed in terms of separable real objects. The theorem is expressed by Bell’s inequality for ideal detectors, but exists also for real detectors and no additional assumptions are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M Born “Physics in my Generation”, Springer, New York (1969), p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J von Neumann, “Die Matematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik”, Springer, Berlin (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N Bohr in “New Theories in Physics, Warsaw 1938”, Int. Inst, of Intellectual Cooperation, Paris (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M Born, “Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance”, Dover, New York (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D Bohm, Phys Rev 85:166 (1952) and 85:180 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L de Broglie, Journ Phys Rad 20: 963 (1959).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. F Selleri, “Die Debatte um die Quantentheorie”, Vieweg, Braunschweig (1983), pages 50–52. J S Bell, Rev Mod Phys 38: 447 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A Einstein, B Podolsky, N Rosen, Phys Rev 47: 777 (1935).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. N Bohr, Phys Rev 48: 696 (1935).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A Garuccio and F Selleri, Found Phys 10: 209 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J F Clauser, M A Home, A Shimony and R A Holt, Phys Rev Lett 23: 880 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S J Freedman and J F Clauser, Phys Rev Lett 28: 938 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R A Holt and F M Pipkin, Harvard University preprint (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J F Clauser, Phys Rev Lett 36: 1223 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. E S Fry and R C Thomson, Phys Rev Lett 37: 465 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A Aspect, P Grangier and F Roger, Phys Rev Lett 47: 460 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. These assumptions will be discussed in detail in the last section of the present paper.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J F Clauser and A Shimony, Rep Progr Phys 41: 1881 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. J F Clauser and M A Home, Phys Rev D10: 526 (1974).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. L R Kasday, J D Ullman and C S Wu, Nuovo Cim 25B: 633 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. G Faraci, D Gutkowski, S Notarrigo and A R Pennisi, Nuovo Cim Lett 9; 607 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A R Wilson, J Lowe and D K Butt, Jour Phys G2: 613 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M Bruno, M DeAgostino and C Maroni, Nuovo Cim 40B: 142 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. G Bertolini, E Diana and A Scotti, Nuovo Cim 63B: 651 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. R Fox, Nuovo Cim Lett 2: 565 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M Lamehi-Rachti and W Mittig, Phys Rev 14: 2543 (1976).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. V Capasso, D Fortunato and F Selleri, Int Jour Theor Phys 7: 319 (1973).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. L R Kasday, in Rendiconti della scuola internazionale di fisica “Enrico Fermi”, IL Corso, “Fondamenti di Meccanica Quantistica”, Academic Press, New York (1971), pl95.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A Aspect, P Grangier and G Roger, Phys Rev Lett 49:91 (1982). A Aspect, J Dalibard and G Roger, Phys Rev Lett 49: 1804 (1982).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. F Falciglia, A Garuccio and L Pappalardo, Lett Nuovo Cim 34: 1 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A J Duncan, Polarization Correlation in Simultaneous Two-Photon Decay Process and Tests of Bell’s Inequality, paper presented at Symposium on New Trends in Atomic Collision Physics (20–21 September 1984, Santa Flavia, Sicily).

    Google Scholar 

  32. T Marshall, E Santos and F Selleri, Lett Nuovo Cim 35:417 (1983). F Selleri, Lett Nuovo Cim 39: 252 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. A Aspect, These, Université de Paris-Sud, Centre d’Orsay (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  34. G Giusfredi,. P Minguzzi, F Strumia and M Toselli, Z Phys A274: 279 (1975).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. S Pascazio, A careful estimate of photon rescattering in atomic cascade experimental tests of Bell’s inequality, Nuovo Cim, in print.

    Google Scholar 

  36. T W Marshall, E Santos and F Selleri, Phys Lett 98A5 (1983). T W Marshall, Phys Lett 99A: 163 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. A Garuccio and F Selleri, Phys Lett 103A: 99 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. F Selleri, Photons with Variable Detection Probability, Phys. Lett., in print (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Selleri, F. (1985). The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Fifty Years Later. In: Kleinpoppen, H., Briggs, J.S., Lutz, H.O. (eds) Fundamental Processes in Atomic Collision Physics. NATO ASI Series, vol 134. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2125-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2125-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9256-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2125-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics