Skip to main content

Abstract

In previous chapters, we discovered how the steps involved in the collection and formation of SAR imagery can be explained in light of tomographic principles. We also saw that several assumptions were made in order for that paradigm to be valid. One of these assumptions limited the allowable amount of wavefront curvature; a second assumption required that the residual phase term from the deramp processing be sufficiently small. We demonstrated how the reconstructed image quality is degraded when these assumptions are not met and derived quantitative conditions on patch size, resolution, standoff range, and several other parameters (see Equations 2.74 and 2.75) that render the degradation in image quality negligible. A third assumption dealt with robust image formation. This assumption is that the amount of time required for each radar pulse to travel from the SAR platform to the patch center and back is known precisely for each transmission point along the synthetic aperture. This demodulation time was defined as τ0 = 2R 0 /c, where R 0 is the distance from the SAR platform to the patch center and c is the propagation velocity of the electromagnetic wave. Up to this point, we simply ignored the consequences of inaccuracies in demodulation times that can arise from noise in real SAR systems. In this chapter we address the matter in detail, because it becomes an important issue in the design and operation of real spotlight-mode SARs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. J. Porcello, “Turbulence-Induced Phase Errors in Synthetic-Aperture Radars,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES-6, pp. 636–644, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. V. Jakowatz Jr., P. H. Eichel, and D. C. Ghiglia, Proceedings of SPIE, Millimeter Wave and Synthetic Aperture Radar, Vol. 1101, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. L. Rino and J. F. Vickrey, “Recent Results in Auroral-Zone Scintillation Studies,” J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Aarons, “Global Morphology of Ionospheric Scintillations,” Proceedings of IEEE, Vol. 70, pp. 360–378, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. A. Bendor, T. W. Gedra, “Single-Pass Fine-Resolution SAR Autofocus,” Proceedings of IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference NAECON, Dayton, Ohio, pp. 482–488, May 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. C. Calloway and G. Donohoe, “Subaperture Autofocus for Synthetic Aperture Radar,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 617–621, April 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. H. Eichel, D. C. Ghiglia, and C. V. Jakowatz Jr., “Speckle Processing Method for Synthetic Aperture Radar Phase Correction,” Optics Letters, Vol. 14, pp. 1101–1103, January 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. V. Jakowatz Jr., and D. E. Wahl, “An Eigenvector Method for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Phase Errors in SAR Imagery,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 10, No. 12, pp. 2539–2546, December 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 54–55, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Fienup, “Phase Error Correction by Shear Averaging,” Technical Digest Series, Signal Recovery and Synthesis I, Vol. 15, pp. 134–137, June 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. H. Attia and B. D. Steinberg, “Self-Cohering Large Antenna Arrays Using the Spatial Correlation Properties of Radar Clutter,” IEEE Transactions on Antenna Propagation, AP-37, pp. 30–38, January 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W. Press, “Recovery of SAR Images with One Dimension of Unknown Phases,” JASON Program Office Report JSR-91-175 DTIC AD-B164984, March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. E. Wahl, P. H. Eichel, D. C. Ghiglia, and C. V. Jakowatz Jr., “Phase Gradient Autofocus — A Robust Tool for High Resolution SAR Phase Correction,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 827–834, July 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. R. Goodman, “Statistical Analysis Based on a Certain Multivariate Complex Gaussian Distribution (An Introduction),” Annals of Statistical Analysis, Vol. 34, pp. 152–177, 1963.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1968.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jakowatz, C.V., Wahl, D.E., Eichel, P.H., Ghiglia, D.C., Thompson, P.A. (1996). Phase Errors and Autofocus in SAR Imagery. In: Spotlight-Mode Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Signal Processing Approach. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1333-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1333-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8573-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1333-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics