Abstract
A fundamental goal of selective attention studies is to specify at which levels of sensory processing different kinds of information are selected or rejected. One key issue is whether stimulus selection occurs at early thalamic and primary cortical areas, or at levels of “higher” secondary and association cortex. In the auditory modality, selective attention to an attended stimulus elicits a large negative deflection, the “Nd” or “processing negativity” component. The physiological substrates of this selective attention effect remains controversial. Some authors have argued that the Nd wave represents (at least in part) an enhancement of the auditory evoked N1 wave, possibly by a mechanism of sensory gating (eg., Hillyard,1981), while others have suggested that the Nd arises from a wholly separate generator system (eg., Naatanen, 1982). Previous results from our laboratory suggest that the late Nd (Ndl) elicited under conditions of a long and constant inter-stimulus interval (ISI), stems from a region of auditory cortex distinct from that generating the evoked N1 component: possibly from auditory association areas (Arthur et al., 1989). Under conditions of a fast, variable ISI, selective attention elicits an additional component, the early Nd (Nde). We are using magnetoencephalography to assess the physiological substrates of both the early and late selective attention processes which occur at a fast, variable ISI.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, D. L, Lewis P. S. Medvick, P. A and Flynn, E. R., 1989, A neuromagnetic study of selective auditory attention. Submitted to Electroenceph.clin.Neurophysiol.
Curtis, S., Kaufman, L. and Williamson, S., 1987, Divided attention revisited: selection based on location or pitch, in: “Biomagnetism: 6th International Conference on Biomagnetism,” K. Atsumi, M. Kotari, S. Vero, T. Katila and S. J. Williamson, eds., Tokyo Denki University Press, Tokyo.
Donald, M. W. and Young, M. J., 1982, A time-course analysis of attentional tuning of the auditory evoked response. Exp.Br.Res., 46:357.
Hansen, J. and Hillyard, S., 1988, Temporal dynamics of human auditory selective attention, Psychophysiology, 25:316.
Hillyard, S. A. 1981, Selective auditory attention: A rejoinder, Can.J.Psychol., 35:85.
Medvick, P. A., Lewis, P. S., Aine, C. and Flynn, E. R. Monte Carlo analysis of localization errors in magnetoencephalography, this volume.
Naatanen, R., 1982, Processing negativity: An evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psych.Bull., 92:605.
Wood, C. C. and Wolpaw, J. R., 1982, Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. II: Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. Electroenceph.clin.Neurophysiol., 54:25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arthur, D., Hillyard, S., Flynn, E., Schmidt, A. (1989). Neural Mechanisms of Selective Auditory Attention. In: Williamson, S.J., Hoke, M., Stroink, G., Kotani, M. (eds) Advances in Biomagnetism. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0581-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0581-1_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7876-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0581-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive