Skip to main content

Diagram Understanding

The Symbolic Descriptions Behind the Scenes

  • Chapter
Visual Languages and Applications

Part of the book series: Languages and Information Systems ((LISS))

Abstract

When two scientists talk to each other about their ideas, they typically do not restrict themselves to words; they also draw diagrams, label them, and tell each other what these diagrams represent. “Here’s a ball rolling down an inclined plane,” one scientist may say, for example, and simultaneously sketch a diagram such as that in Figure 1. In order to understand this kind of conversation, the scientists must recognize the circle as such and associate it with a ball, recognize the arrow and associate it with a vector, and recognize the triangle and associate it with a ramp. After these associations are made, the behavior of the objects in the diagram is then determined. The diagram is a kind of notation with which to solve simple physics problems. Alternatively, the scientists may use a standardized notation whose meaning is known by everyone in the culture, such as algebra. In either case, there is a specific association between visual objects and descriptions for these objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Winograd, Language as a Cognitive Process, Vol. I: Syntax, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1983.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Zdybel, N. R. Greenfeld, M. D. Yonke, and J. Gibbons, An information presentation system, Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-81, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August, 1981, pp. 978–984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Friedell, J. Barnett, and D. Kramlich, Context-sensitive, graphic presentation of information, Comput. Graphics 16(3), 181–188 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Friedell, Automatic synthesis of graphical object descriptions, Comput. Graphics 18(3), 53–62 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Bongard, Pattern Recognition, Macmillan, London 1970.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. F. S. Montalvo, Knowledge Visualizer: A Graphic Interface-Building Tool Kit, MIT Media Laboratory Technical Report, Cambridge, MA (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. N. Labov, The boundaries of words and their meanings, in New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, C. N. Bailey and R. W. Shuy (Eds.), Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. C. Ciccarelli, Presentation based user interfaces, Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Gligksman, A Cooperative Scheme for Image Understanding Using Multiple Sources of Information, Department of Computer Science Technical Report 82–13, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, November, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. P. Pentland, Shading into texture, Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI-84, Austin, Texas, August 1984, pp. 269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Sloman, What are the purposes of vision?, Presented at the Alvey Vision Conference at Sussex University, September, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. S. Montalvo, Aftereffects, adaptation, and plasticity: a neural model for tunable feature space, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. S. Montalvo, Diagram Understanding: The Intersection between Computer Vision and Graphics, A. I. Memo No. 873, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, Massachusetts, November, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. M. Treisman and G. Gelade, A feature-integration theory of attention, Cognitive Psychology 12, 97–136 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. M. Treisman and H. Schmidt, Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects, Cognitive Psychology 14, 107–141 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. R. Pomerantz and W. R. Garner, Stimulus configuration in selective attention tasks, Perception and Psychophysics 14, 565–569 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. I. Goldstein, FRL: a Frame Representation Language, A. I. Memo No. 333, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Stefik, An examination of a frame structured representation system, Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-79, Tokyo, Japan, August, 1979, pp. 845–852.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Montalvo, F.S. (1990). Diagram Understanding. In: Ichikawa, T., Jungert, E., Korfhage, R.R. (eds) Visual Languages and Applications. Languages and Information Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0569-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0569-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7871-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0569-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics