Abstract
Historians constantly face two closely related problems: to make new textual material available and to destroy generally accepted theories. The present paper is concerned with the latter aspect, in the case of the more and more frequently quoted statement that the Babylonian astronomer Kidinnu was the discoverer of the precession of the equinoxes and that this event can be dated in 379 b. c., thus antedating Hipparchus by about two and one-half centuries. It may seem as if we were dealing here with one of those questions of priority which are of very little significance. Actually the problem has wider implications. It is closely related to the problem of the date of origin of Babylonian mathematical astronomy, which exercised a deep influence on Greek astronomy and its continuation in the Middle Ages. It is furthermore of importance for the evaluation of Babylonian astronomy and the mutual role of observation versus theory during the Seleucid period.
Rien n’égale la rapidité avec laquelle se répand léerreur historique si ce n’est la ténacité qu’elle oppose aux tentatives de réfutation.
Duhem, Le Système du Monde, I, 21.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Halma [CT], Commentaire de Théon d’Alexandrie sur les tables manuelles astronomiques de Ptolemée, I, Paris, 1822.
F. X. Kugler [BMR], Babylonische Mondrechnung, Freiburg, 1900.
F. X. Kugler [SSB], Sternkunde u. Sterndienst in Babel, 2 vols., Münster, 1907-1924.
O. Neugebauer [1], Die babylonische Theorie der Breitenbewegung des Mondes, Quellen u. Studien z. Gesch. d. Math., Ser. B 4 (1938), p. 193–346.
O. Neugebauer [2], Mathematical methods in ancient astronomy, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 54 (1948), p. 1013–1041.
O. Neugebauer [3], Solstices and equinoxes in Babylonian astronomy during the Seleucid period, J. Cuneiform Studies, 2 (1949), p. 209–222.
O. Neugebauer [4], A table of solstices from Uruk, J. Cuneiform Studies, 1 (1948), p. 143–148.
A. Rome [1], Le problème de l’équation du temps chez Ptolémée, Ann. Soc. Sci. de Bruxelles, sér. I, 59 (1939), p. 211–224.
A. J. Sachs [1], A Classification of the Babylonian Astronomical Tablets of the Seleucid Period, to appear in the Journal of Cuneiform Studies, vol. 2.
P. Schnabel, Berossos und die babylonisch-hellenistische Literatur, Leipzig-Berlin, Teubner, 1923.
P. Schnabel [1], Kidenas, Hipparch und die Entdeckung der Praezession, Zeitschr. f. Assyriol., 37 (1927), p. 1–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neugebauer, O. (1983). The Alleged Babylonian Discovery of the Precession of the Equinoxes. In: Astronomy and History Selected Essays. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5559-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5559-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-90844-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5559-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive