Abstract
In 1985, David Mermin, a solid-state physicist at Cornell, wrote a funny and informative account of the EPR argument and Bell’s theorem for Physics Today, the Wall Street Journal of the American physics community. Mermin’s article generated a resurgence of interest in the subject, which swept like a cresting wave through the cocktail-party circuit and just as quickly receded. I recall confused discussions from this period with members of my generation, who alternately declared Bell’s theorem trivial, uninteresting, or the greatest discovery since Einstein proved moving clocks go slowly. One sentiment produced universal agreement, however: Do not write papers or apply for grants in the area, since “philosophical” issues are career killers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clauser and Home, Phys. Rev. D 10, (1974), p. 526
T.K. Lo and A.S. Shimony, Phys. Rev. A 23: 6, (1981).
A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, (1982), p. 1804.
Caser, S., Phys. Lett. 121, (1987), p. 131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Birkhäuser Boston
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wick, D. (1995). Loopholes. In: The Infamous Boundary. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5361-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5361-7_14
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-5363-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5361-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive