Skip to main content

Conspiracy Theory in Conflict Escalation

  • Chapter
Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Social Psychology ((SSSOC))

Abstract

This chapter deals with the role of conspiracy theory in conflict escalation. Conspiracy theory is the belief that a group of people is plotting to harm one’s interests. By conflict is meant a perceived divergence of interest between two or more parties. Conflict escalates when the parties to a conflict move from lighter to heavier heavier contentious tactics, for example, when discussion turns to argument, argument to yelling, yelling to blows.

ArticleNotes

Presented at the symposium on Conceptions of Conspiracy II in Bad Homburg, West Germany, December 17–19, 1984. Preparation of this paper was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BNS83-0916701.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bern, D.J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1957). Community conflict. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, R. (1968). The age of reform: From Bryan to FDR. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.E., & Gerard, H.B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A.W. (1987). Blame-placing schemata and attributional research. (This volume, Chapter 13.)

    Google Scholar 

  • North, R.C., Brody, R. A., & Holsti, O.R. (1964). Some empirical data on the conflict spiral. Peace Research Society (International) Papers, 1 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D.G., & Gahagan, J.P. (1974). Campus crisis: The search for power. In J.T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Perspectives on social power. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D.G., & Rubin, J.Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate and settlement. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D.J., Hastorf, A.H., & Ellsworth, P.C. (1979). Person perception (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1955). The sociology of imperialism. New York: Meridian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.R., & Sherif, C.W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robber’s cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillars, A.L. (1981). Attributions and interpersonal conflict resolution. In J.H. Harvey, W.J. Ickes, & R.F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attributional research (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syna, H. (1984). Couples in conflict: Conflict resolution strategies, perceptions about sources of conflict and relationship adjustment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P.E. (1983). Policy-makers’ images of international conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 39 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R.K. (1965). Images in the context of international conflict: Soviet perceptions of the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. In H.C. Kelman (Ed.), International behavior: A social-psychological analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R.K. (1984). Fearful warriors: A psychological profile of U.S.-Soviet Relations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, D.A. (1975). A theory of social entities: Effects of group membership on social perception and social influences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, D.A. (1978). Reduction of intergroup discrimination through individuation of the out-group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 1361–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, S., & Andreoli, V. (1978). Facilitation of social interaction through individuation of the target. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 549–556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pruitt, D.G. (1987). Conspiracy Theory in Conflict Escalation. In: Graumann, C.F., Moscovici, S. (eds) Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9802-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4618-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics