Skip to main content

A Counterexample to Generalized Accessibility

  • Conference paper
Arboreal Group Theory

Part of the book series: Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications ((MSRI,volume 19))

Abstract

Throughout this paper, G ×TT will be an action of the group G on the tree T. Unless noted, our actions are simplicial and without inversions. In [BF], we showed that if a) G is finitely presented and b) G ×TT satisfies certain other conditions reviewed below, then the number of vertices and edges of T/G is bounded in terms of G alone. The main point of this paper is to produce actions G 0 ×TT of a fixed finitely generated group which satisfy b) and yet have arbitrarily many vertices. By taking the limit of a sequence of more and more complicated actions, we obtain an interesting action of G o on an ℝ-tree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Alperin and H. Bass, Length functions of group actions on A-trees, in “Combinatorial Group Theory and Topology”, ed. S. M. Gersten and J. R. Stallings, Ann. Math. Stud. 111 (1987), 265–378.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bestvina and M. Feighn, Bounding the complexity of simplicial group actions on trees, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Culler and J.W. Morgan, Group actions on R-trees, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 55 (1987), 571–604.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. M.J. Dunwoody, The accessibility of finitely presented groups, Inv. Math. 81 (1985), 449–457.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. G.P. Scott and C.T.C. Wall, Topological methods in group theory, in “Homological Group Theory”, ed. C.T.C. Wall, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes 36 (1979), 137–203.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.P. Serre, “Trees,” Springer-Verlag, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.R. Stallings, Topology of finite graphs, Inv. Math. 71 (1983), 551–565.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Steiner, Gluing data and group actions on A-trees, Thesis, Columbia University (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.T.C. Wall, Pairs of relative cohomological dimension one, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 1 (1971), 141–154.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bestvina, M., Feighn, M. (1991). A Counterexample to Generalized Accessibility. In: Alperin, R.C. (eds) Arboreal Group Theory. Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol 19. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3142-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3142-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7811-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3142-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics