Skip to main content

Attitudes Toward Computer Technology between Nursing and Medical Educators

  • Chapter
Nursing and Computers

Part of the book series: Computers and Medicine ((C+M))

  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

Technological innovations have revolutionized educational and clinical practice environments. Although the availability of biomedical technology is escalating at an unprecedented pace, a belief exists that biomedical technological innovations are being diffused at a slow rate among health care professionals [1,2,3,4]. The literature on technological innovations emphasizes the significance of attitudes regarding the human-machine interface in influencing the diffusion process [5,6]. An understanding of health care professionals’ attitudes toward technological innovations can contribute to an understanding of the biomedical innovation diffusion process. The medical and nursing educators’ mission is to prepare professionals to function competently in health care educational and clinical environments. Medical and nursing educators, however, are slowly adopting and implementing the technological advances available for educational and health care delivery environments. Nursing and medical educators’ attitudes toward the human-machine interface can impact this mission and the diffusion process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. G., and Jay, S. J. (Eds.). (1987).Use and impact of computers in clinical medicine. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cox, H., Harsanyi, B., and Dean, L. (1987).Computers and nursing: Application to practice, education and research. East Norwalk Ct: Appleton and Lange.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dowling, A. F. (1980). Do hospital staff interfere with computer system implementation?Health Care Management Review,5(4), 23–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grann, R. P. (1984). Attitudes and effective use of computers among hospital personnel. In G. S. Cohen (Ed.),Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care,8, 543 – 547.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan, B. (1986). Impact of a clinical laboratory computer system: Users’ Perceptions. In R. Salamon, B. Blum, M. Jorgensen (Eds.),Medinfo 86(pp. 1057–1061). Amsterdam: North Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kjerulff, K. H., Counte, M. A., Salloway, J. C., and Campbell, B. C. (1983). Measuring adaptation to medical technology.Hospital and Health Services Administration,28, 30–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Melhorn, J. M., Legler, W. K., and Clark, G. M. (1979). Current attitudes of medical personnel toward computers.Computers and Biomedical Research,12, 327–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Singer, J., Sacks, H. S., Lucente, F., and Chalmers, T. C. (1983). Physician attitude toward applications of computer data base systems.Journal of the American Medical Association,249, 1610–1614.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Startsman, T. S. and Robinson, R. E. (1972). The attitudes of medical and paramedial personnel toward computers.Computers and Biomedical Research, 5 (3), 218–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Teach, R. L., and Shortliffe, E. H. (1981). An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems.Computers and Biomedical Research,14, 542–558.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman, R. B., and Gustafson, D. H. (1977). Guest Editorial: Computers in medicine: A critical review.Computers and Biomedical Research,10(3), 199–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hudson, D. L. and Cohen, M. E. (1985). The role of user interface in a medical expert system. In M. J. Ackerman (Ed.),Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care,9, 232–236.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kjerulff, K. H., Counte, M. A., and Salloway, J. C. (1986). Attitudes toward computers and employee turnover during implementation of a pharmacy information system. In R. Salamon, B. Blum, and M. Jorgensen (Eds.)Medinfo 86(pp. 1046–1051). Amsterdam: North Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kjerulff, K. H., Counte, M. A., Salloway, J. C., Campbell, B. C., and Noskin, D. E. (1984). Medical information system training: An analysis of the reactions of hospital employees.Computers and Biomedical Research,17, 303–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson, J. G., and Jay, S. J. (Eds.). (1987).Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brodt, A. and Stronge, J. H. (1986). Nurses’ attitudes toward computerization in a Midwestern community hospital.Computers in Nursing,4, 82–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Merrow, S. L. (1984). Nursing educators’ and nursing service personnel’s knowledge of and attitudes toward computer use in nursing practice.Dissertation Abstracts International 45/09B, 2870. (University Microfilms No. 84-25987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ronald, J. S. (1982). Attitudes and learning needs of nursing educators with respect to computers: Implications for curriculum planning.Dissertation Abstracts International,43/09A, 2879. (University Microfilms No. 83-03098).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Theis, J. B. ( 1975, Winter). Hospital personnel and computer-based systems: A study of attitudes and perception.Hospital Administration, 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cleveland, L. M. (1985). Computer utilization within nursing curriculum.Dissertation Abstracts International, 46/10A, 2902. (University Microfilms No. 85-26856).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Delaney, C. J. (1986). Administrator and faculty acceptance of the computer as a technological innovation in baccalaureate nursing programs in independent colleges in the Midwest.Dissertation Abstracts International,47/07A, 2388. (University Microfilms No. 86-22760).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Armstrong, M. L. (1983). Paving the way for more effective computer usage.Nursing and Health Care,4, 557–560.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Goethler, A. N. (1985). Nursing education update: Computer technology.Nursing and Health Care,6, 509–510.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson, B. M. (1983).Microcomputers in the Nursing Dean’s Office. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Murphy, M. A. (1984). Computer-based education in nursing-Factors influencing its utilization.Computers in Nursing,2(6), 218–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas, B. S. (1985). A survey study of computers in nursing education.Computers in Nursing,3, 173–179.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Aydin, C. E. (1988).Social Information Processing and Individual Differences in Information System Attitudes and Use. Unpublished manuscript. University of Southern California, Annenberg School of Communications, Los Angeles, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Morin, P. J. (1982). A comparative study of attitudes toward computer assisted instruction and learning styles of nursing students.Dissertation Abstracts International, 43/03A, 653. (University Microfilms No. 82-17547).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kadner, K. (1984). Change: Introducing computer-assisted instruction (CAI) to a college of nursing faculty.Journal of Nursing Education,23(8), 349–350.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Murphy, M. A. (1984). Computer-based education in nursing—Factors influencing its utilization.Computers in Nursing,2(6), 218–222.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kjerulff, K. H., and Counte, M. A. (1984a). Measuring attitudes towards computers: Two approaches. In G. S. Cohen (Ed.),Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care,8, 529–535.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Harsanyi, B. (1987).Computer Attitude Profile. Unpublished profile.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harsanyi, B.E., Kelsey, C.E. (1998). Attitudes Toward Computer Technology between Nursing and Medical Educators. In: Saba, V.K., Pocklington, D.B., Miller, K.P. (eds) Nursing and Computers. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2182-1_87

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2182-1_87

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7448-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2182-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics