Skip to main content

A Tailored Suit for Risk Management: Hyperbolic Model

  • Chapter
Measuring Risk in Complex Stochastic Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 147))

Abstract

In recent years the need to quantifying risk has become increasingly important to financial institutions for a number of reasons: the necessity for more efficient controlling due to globalisation and sharply increased trading volumes; management of new financial derivatives and structured products; and enforced legislation setting out the capital requirements for trading activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. and Heath, D. (1997). Thinking coherently, RISK 10(11): 68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O. (1977). Exponentially decreasing distributions for the logarithm of particle size, Proceedings of the Royal Society London A (353): 401–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O. (1997). Processes of normal inverse gaussian type, Finance & Stochastics (2): 41–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O. and Halgreen, O. (1977). Infinite divisibility of the hyperbolic and generalized inverse gaussian distributions, Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete (38): 309–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, K. (1998). Beyond Value At Risk: The New Science of Risk Management, Wiley&Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, E. and Keller, U. (1995). Hyperbolic distributions in finance, Bernoulli 1: 281–299.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, E., Keller, U. and Prause, K. (1998). New insights into smile, mispricing and value at risk: the hyperbolic model, Journal of Business (71): 371–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. and Litzenberger, R. (1988). Foundations for financial economics, North-Holland, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (1998). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Controlling Derivatives Risk, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokic, P., Breckling, J. and Eberlein, E. (1999). A new framework for the evaluation of market and credit risk. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridder, T. (1998). Basics of statistical var-estimation, in G. Bol, G. Nakhaeizadeh and K. Vollmer (eds), Risk measurement, econometrics and neural networks, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breckling, J., Eberlein, E., Kokic, P. (2000). A Tailored Suit for Risk Management: Hyperbolic Model. In: Franke, J., Stahl, G., Härdle, W. (eds) Measuring Risk in Complex Stochastic Systems. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 147. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1214-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1214-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98996-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1214-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics