Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Statistics ((STS))

Abstract

As outlined in Chapter 1 the techniques of statistical inference usually require that assumptions be made regarding the sample data. Such assumptions usually include the type of sampling process that produced the data and in some cases the nature of the population distribution from which the sample was drawn. When assumptions are violated the techniques employed can lead to misleading results. Good statistical practice therefore requires that the data be studied in detail before statistical inference procedures are applied. The techniques of exploratory data analysis are designed to provide such a preliminary view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, V. and Lewis, T. (1978). Outliers in Statistical Data, New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dixon, W.J. (1950). “Analysis of Extreme Values,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21, 488–506.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dixon, W.J. (1951). “Ratios Involving Extreme Values,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22, 68–78.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dixon, W.J. and Kronmal (1965). “The Choice of Origin and Scale for Graphs,” Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 12, 259–261.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Filliben, J.J. (1975). “The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for Normality,” Technometrics 17, 111–117.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Grubbs, F.E. and Beck, G. (1972). “Extension of Sample Sizes and Percentage Points for Significance Tests of Outlying Observations,” Technometrics 14, 847–854.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hinkley, D.V. (1975). “On Power Transformations to Symmetry,” Biometrika 62, 101–111.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoaglin, C., Mosteller, F. and Tukey, J.W. (1985). Exploring Data, Tables, Trends and Shapes. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoaglin, David C., Iglewicz, Boris and Tukey, John W. (1986). “Performance of Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labelling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 991–999.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hogg, Robert V. (1974). “Adaptive Robust Procedures: A Partial Review and Some Suggestions for Future Applications and Theory,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 69, 909–923.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. John, J.A. and Draper, N.R. (1980). “An Alternative Family of Transformations,” Applied Statistics 29, 190–197.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, R.A. and Wichern, D.W. (1982). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lilliefors, H.W. (1967). “On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, 399–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, C. and Mudhulkar, G.S. (1980). “A Simple Test for Normality Against Asymmetric Alternatives,” Biometrika 67, 455–461.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mardia, K.V. (1980). “Tests of Univariate and Multivariate Normality” in P.R. Krishnaiah ed., Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 1. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, Rupert G. (1986). Beyond Anova, Basics of Applied Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moors, J.J.A. (1988). “A Quantile Alternative for Kurtosis,” Statistician 37, 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenberger, James L. and Gasko, Miriam (1983). “Comparing Location Estimators: Trimmed Means, Medians and Trimean” in Hoaglin,Mosteller and Tukey ed., Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shiftier, Ron E. (1987). “Bounds for the Maximum Z-Score,” Teaching Statistics 9, 80–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stephans, M.A. (1974). “EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some Comparisons,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 69, 730–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sturges, H.A. (1926). “The Choice of a Class Interval,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 21, 65–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Velleman, P.F. (1976). “Interactive Computing for Exploratory Data Analysis I: Display Algorithms,” 1975 Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section. Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jobson, J.D. (1991). Univariate Data Analysis. In: Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0955-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0955-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6960-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0955-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics