Abstract
A common engineering practice is to assume that a system can be described by a set of linear differential equations for some operating range of interest as follows
wherex(t)denotes the states of the system,A,Bdenote time invariant matrices, and u(t) denotes the control input. Based on the assumption that (1.1) accurately describes the system behavior, the control practitioner can then exploit various properties from linear control theory. As stated in [10], in the absence of the input signal (i.e., the unforced system), these properties include (1) a unique equilibrium point if the A matrix is nonsingular, (2) the equilibrium point is stable if the eigenvalues of A have negative real roots, and (3) the linear differential equations can be solved analytically, allowing the transient response to be explicitly determined When a control inputu(t)is present, linear time invariant systems exhibit properties including (1) superposition, (2) asymptotic stability of the unforced system ensures bounded-input bounded-output stability, and (3) a sinusoidal input leads to a sinusoidal output of the same frequency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Bloch, M. Reyhanoglu, and N. McClamroch, “Control and Stabilization of Nonholonomic Dynamic Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlVol. 37, No. 11, Nov. 1992, pp. 1746–1757.
C. Canudas de Wit, K. Khennouf, C. Samson, and O. J. Sordalen, “Nonlinear Control for Mobile Robots,” inRecent Trends in Mobile Robotsed. Y. Zheng, River Edge, NJ: World Scientific, 1993.
J.J. Craig, Adaptive Control of Mechanical Manipulators, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1988.
P. C. HughesSpacecraft Attitude DynamicsNew York, NY: John Wiley, 1986.
H. K. KhalilNonlinear SystemsUpper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
P. Kokotovic, “The Joy of Feedback: Nonlinear and Adaptive,”IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Vol. 12, June 1992, pp. 7–17.
M. A. Lyapunov, “Problème général de la stabilité du mouvement,” Ann.Fac. Sci. ToulouseVol. 9, 1907, pp. 203–474. (Translation of the original paper published in 1892 inComm. Soc. Math. Kharkow and reprinted as Vol. 17 in Ann.Math StudiesPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.)
Z. QuRobust Control of Nonlinear Uncertain Systems, New YorkNY: John Wiley, 1998.
J. Slotine, “Putting Physics in Control — The Example of Robotics,”IEEE Control Systems Magazine Vol. 8, Dec. 1998, pp. 12–17.
J. -J. E. Slotine and L. WiApplied Nonlinear ControlEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1991.
H. J. Sussmann, “Limitations on the Stabilizability of Globally Minimum Phase Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Vol. 35, No. 1, Jan. 1990, pp. 117–119.
H. J. Sussmann and P. V. Kokotovic, “The Peaking Phenomenon and the Global Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Vol. 36, No. 4, Apr. 1991, pp. 424–440.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dixon, W.E., Behal, A., Dawson, D.M., Nagarkatti, S.P. (2003). Introduction. In: Nonlinear Control of Engineering Systems. Control Engineering. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0031-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0031-4_1
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6581-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0031-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive