Skip to main content

German Efforts to Shape European Renewable Energy Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Policy Making in the EU

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 28))

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates how Germany strove to shape the European Union’s (EU) emerging policies on renewable energy. We argue that German decision-makers were motivated by three factors. First, they were influenced by a broad consensus in their own country about the desirability of renewable energy and believed the solutions that worked for Germany would also work for the entire EU. Second, Germany sought to protect the regulatory innovations it had developed by promoting those same regulations at the European level. Third, by establishing a European system that resembled its own, German decision-makers sought to give its own entrepreneurs in the renewable sector a competitive edge in the broader European market. We demonstrate this argument with a process tracing of the development of the 2009 Directive on Renewable Energy Sources (RES).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdelal, R., & Ruggie, J. G. (2009). The principles of embedded liberalism: Social legitimacy and global capitalism. In D. Moss & J. Cisternino (Eds.), New perspectives on regulation (pp. 151–162). Cambridge: Tobin Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barroso, J. M. (2005). Working together for growth and jobs: A new start for the Lisbon strategy. Conference of Presidents, European Parliament, Speech 05/67. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barysch, K. (2007). What to expect from the German Presidency, centre for European Reform. Briefing Note, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A. (2002). Member state responses to Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, D. (2009). Energy and Climate Change: Europe at the Crossroads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the EU (2007) Brussels European Council. March 8,9. Presidency Conclusions7224/1/07 REV 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehmer, D. (2007). Die Klimakanzlerin. Der Tagesspiegel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, J. S., & Westphal, K. (2011). Germany and EU energy policy: Conflicted champion of integration? In V. L. Birchfield and J. S. Duffield (Eds.), Toward a common European Union energy policy (pp. 169–186). New. York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2001). Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market. OJ L 283, 33-40. October 27, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • EREC. (2007). Renewable energy technology road map up to 2020. EREC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2006a). Renewable energy road map: Renewable energies in the 21st century: Building a more sustainable future. COM (2006) 848 Final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2006b). Communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament, green paper follow-up action report on progress in renewable electricity. COM (2006) 849 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2008). Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. COM (2008) 19 final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. (2010). Renewable energy sources act: Key features, developments and perspectives. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A., Knill, C., & Mingers, S. (1996). Ringing the changes in Europe. Regulatory competition and the transformation of the state. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschl, B. (2008). Erneuerbare Energiepolitik im Mehrebenensystem. Wiesbaden: VS Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2007) Energy policies of IEA countries: Germany 2007 Review OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1985). New perspectives on value change. Comparative Political Studies, 17(4), 485–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interview. (2013a). Representative from the German federal ministry of economics and technology (BMWi). June 3, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview. (2013b). Representative from the German federal ministry for environment, nature conservation and nuclear safety (BMU). June 5, Berlin, Germany .

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview. (2013c). Representative from the European commission DG-Energy. June 23, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jänicke, M. (2011). German climate change policy: Political and economic leadership. In R. K. W. Wurzel & J. Connelly (Eds.), The European Union as a leader in international climate change politics (pp. 129–146). UACES Contemporary European Studies: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesburg Renewable Energy Coalition. (2004). European Conference for Renewable Energy—Intelligent Policy Options. Berlin. 19–21, January 2004. Conference Conclusions and Recommendations to Renewables.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., & Lenschow, A. (2001). Adjusting to EU environmental policy: change and persistence of domestic administrations. In M. G. Cowles, J. Caporaso & T. Risse (Eds.), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change (pp. 116–136). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2011). Environmental policy. In H. Heinelt & M. Knodt (Eds.), Policies within the EU multi-level system (pp. 171–188). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B., & Rittberger, B. (2006). The ‘governance turn’ in EU studies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(1), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauber, V., & Schenner, E. (2011). The struggle over support schemes for renewable electricity in the European Union: A discursive-institutionalis analysis. Environmental Politics, 20(4), 508–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefferink, D., & Andersen, M. S. (1998). Strategies of the “green” member states in EU environmental policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(2), 254–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, R. (2004). The swing of the regulatory pendulum in Europe: From precautionary principle to (regulatory) impact analysis. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28(3), 237–260.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natorski, M., & Surrallés, H. A. (2008). Securitizing moves to nowhere? The framing of the European Union energy policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 4(2), 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidency of the Council of the European Union. (2007). Europe—Succeeding Together, Presidency Program. January 1 to June 30 2007. Federal Government of Germany, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Princen, S. (2007). Agenda-setting in the European Union: A theoretical exploration and agenda for research. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Princen, S. (2011). Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 927–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Princen, S., & Rhinard, M. (2006). Crashing and creeping: Agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), 1119–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994). Problem definition: An emerging perspective. In D. A. Rochefort & R. W. Cobb (Eds.), The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda (pp. 1–31). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transaction, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöpe, M. (2007). Meeting the EU 20 % RE objective by 2020: MS efforts and compensation schemes. Presentation given at the 5th Amsterdam Forum. October 2, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, A. (2000). In the service of the European Union. The role of the presidency in negotiating the Amsterdam Treaty 1995–1997. Ph.D. dissertation, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2003). The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Renewable Energy Sources Act. (2004). Germany: Bundestag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toke, D. (2008). The EU renewables directive: What is the fuss about trading? Energy Policy, 36(8), 3001–3008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, J. (2013). How the EU handles uncertain risks: Understanding the role of the precautionary principle. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1517–1528.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wettestad, J., Eikeland, P. O., & Nilsson, M. (2012). EU climate and energy policy: A hesitant supranational turn. Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, N. (2003). Coupling, complexity, and the future of European integration. Review of Policy Research, 20(2), 285–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Henry Cox .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cox, R.H., Dekanozishvili, M. (2015). German Efforts to Shape European Renewable Energy Policy. In: Tosun, J., Biesenbender, S., Schulze, K. (eds) Energy Policy Making in the EU. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 28. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6645-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6645-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6644-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6645-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics