Abstract
This chapter demonstrates how Germany strove to shape the European Union’s (EU) emerging policies on renewable energy. We argue that German decision-makers were motivated by three factors. First, they were influenced by a broad consensus in their own country about the desirability of renewable energy and believed the solutions that worked for Germany would also work for the entire EU. Second, Germany sought to protect the regulatory innovations it had developed by promoting those same regulations at the European level. Third, by establishing a European system that resembled its own, German decision-makers sought to give its own entrepreneurs in the renewable sector a competitive edge in the broader European market. We demonstrate this argument with a process tracing of the development of the 2009 Directive on Renewable Energy Sources (RES).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdelal, R., & Ruggie, J. G. (2009). The principles of embedded liberalism: Social legitimacy and global capitalism. In D. Moss & J. Cisternino (Eds.), New perspectives on regulation (pp. 151–162). Cambridge: Tobin Project.
Barroso, J. M. (2005). Working together for growth and jobs: A new start for the Lisbon strategy. Conference of Presidents, European Parliament, Speech 05/67. Brussels.
Barysch, K. (2007). What to expect from the German Presidency, centre for European Reform. Briefing Note, London, UK.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Börzel, T. A. (2002). Member state responses to Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 193–214.
Buchan, D. (2009). Energy and Climate Change: Europe at the Crossroads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Council of the EU (2007) Brussels European Council. March 8,9. Presidency Conclusions7224/1/07 REV 1.
Dehmer, D. (2007). Die Klimakanzlerin. Der Tagesspiegel.
Duffield, J. S., & Westphal, K. (2011). Germany and EU energy policy: Conflicted champion of integration? In V. L. Birchfield and J. S. Duffield (Eds.), Toward a common European Union energy policy (pp. 169–186). New. York: Palgrave Macmillan.
EC. (2001). Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market. OJ L 283, 33-40. October 27, 2001.
EREC. (2007). Renewable energy technology road map up to 2020. EREC, Brussels.
European Commission. (2006a). Renewable energy road map: Renewable energies in the 21st century: Building a more sustainable future. COM (2006) 848 Final. Brussels.
European Commission. (2006b). Communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament, green paper follow-up action report on progress in renewable electricity. COM (2006) 849 final. Brussels.
European Commission. (2008). Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. COM (2008) 19 final, Brussels.
European Commission. (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, Brussels.
Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. (2010). Renewable energy sources act: Key features, developments and perspectives. Berlin.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.
Héritier, A., Knill, C., & Mingers, S. (1996). Ringing the changes in Europe. Regulatory competition and the transformation of the state. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hirschl, B. (2008). Erneuerbare Energiepolitik im Mehrebenensystem. Wiesbaden: VS Research.
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2007) Energy policies of IEA countries: Germany 2007 Review OECD.
Inglehart, R. (1985). New perspectives on value change. Comparative Political Studies, 17(4), 485–532.
Interview. (2013a). Representative from the German federal ministry of economics and technology (BMWi). June 3, Berlin, Germany.
Interview. (2013b). Representative from the German federal ministry for environment, nature conservation and nuclear safety (BMU). June 5, Berlin, Germany .
Interview. (2013c). Representative from the European commission DG-Energy. June 23, Brussels.
Jänicke, M. (2011). German climate change policy: Political and economic leadership. In R. K. W. Wurzel & J. Connelly (Eds.), The European Union as a leader in international climate change politics (pp. 129–146). UACES Contemporary European Studies: Routledge.
Johannesburg Renewable Energy Coalition. (2004). European Conference for Renewable Energy—Intelligent Policy Options. Berlin. 19–21, January 2004. Conference Conclusions and Recommendations to Renewables.
Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
Knill, C., & Lenschow, A. (2001). Adjusting to EU environmental policy: change and persistence of domestic administrations. In M. G. Cowles, J. Caporaso & T. Risse (Eds.), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change (pp. 116–136). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2011). Environmental policy. In H. Heinelt & M. Knodt (Eds.), Policies within the EU multi-level system (pp. 171–188). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Kohler-Koch, B., & Rittberger, B. (2006). The ‘governance turn’ in EU studies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(1), 27–49.
Lauber, V., & Schenner, E. (2011). The struggle over support schemes for renewable electricity in the European Union: A discursive-institutionalis analysis. Environmental Politics, 20(4), 508–527.
Liefferink, D., & Andersen, M. S. (1998). Strategies of the “green” member states in EU environmental policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(2), 254–270.
Löfstedt, R. (2004). The swing of the regulatory pendulum in Europe: From precautionary principle to (regulatory) impact analysis. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28(3), 237–260.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.
Natorski, M., & Surrallés, H. A. (2008). Securitizing moves to nowhere? The framing of the European Union energy policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 4(2), 71–89.
Presidency of the Council of the European Union. (2007). Europe—Succeeding Together, Presidency Program. January 1 to June 30 2007. Federal Government of Germany, Brussels.
Princen, S. (2007). Agenda-setting in the European Union: A theoretical exploration and agenda for research. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 21–38.
Princen, S. (2011). Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 927–943.
Princen, S., & Rhinard, M. (2006). Crashing and creeping: Agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), 1119–1132.
Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994). Problem definition: An emerging perspective. In D. A. Rochefort & R. W. Cobb (Eds.), The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda (pp. 1–31). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transaction, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415.
Schöpe, M. (2007). Meeting the EU 20 % RE objective by 2020: MS efforts and compensation schemes. Presentation given at the 5th Amsterdam Forum. October 2, 2007.
Svensson, A. (2000). In the service of the European Union. The role of the presidency in negotiating the Amsterdam Treaty 1995–1997. Ph.D. dissertation, Uppsala University.
Tallberg, J. (2003). The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 1–19.
The Renewable Energy Sources Act. (2004). Germany: Bundestag.
Toke, D. (2008). The EU renewables directive: What is the fuss about trading? Energy Policy, 36(8), 3001–3008.
Tosun, J. (2013). How the EU handles uncertain risks: Understanding the role of the precautionary principle. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1517–1528.
Wettestad, J., Eikeland, P. O., & Nilsson, M. (2012). EU climate and energy policy: A hesitant supranational turn. Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 67–86.
Zahariadis, N. (2003). Coupling, complexity, and the future of European integration. Review of Policy Research, 20(2), 285–310.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cox, R.H., Dekanozishvili, M. (2015). German Efforts to Shape European Renewable Energy Policy. In: Tosun, J., Biesenbender, S., Schulze, K. (eds) Energy Policy Making in the EU. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 28. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6645-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6645-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6644-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6645-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)