Skip to main content

Agenda Dynamics on Energy Policy in the European Council

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Policy Making in the EU

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 28))

Abstract

Policy issues can arrive on the agendas of political institutions following two routes: a low and a high politics one. In the first case, involvement of experts and working groups is envisaged. In the latter, the power of top institutions is emphasized with their tasks of drawing overall strategies, acting as final arbiters or decision-makers and delegating policy proposals downwards. A high politics institution in the multilevel system of the EU is the European Council, whose role in shaping the Union agenda has increased over the years. Analysing the Conclusions issued after meetings of this body, we find that energy is a topic with relatively little overall attention and sensitive to drastic shifts over time. Energy-related issues appearance on the agenda was sometimes the result of focusing events but also represented strategic discussions in the form of policy planning and review. Classifying the statements in the Conclusions of the European Council in categories, we find that the text can be almost equally divided between evaluations or positions, setting of targets and concrete actions. In short, while attracting on average rather limited attention, energy has the power to become salient in times of critical events or strong need of strategic guideline provision. And its appearance on the agenda often results in new initiatives and delegation of action to lower levels of policy making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    After Croatia entered on 1 July 2013, there are 21 more member states than at the time when Peters wrote his essay.

  2. 2.

    The dataset is publicly available at www.policyagendas.eu/data.

  3. 3.

    Not shown in the figure.

  4. 4.

    The data on governmental agendas are based on executive speeches coded within the Comparative Agendas Project (www.comparativeagendas.info).

  5. 5.

    Such statements may or may not be followed by substantive policy proposals.

  6. 6.

    An action can also be cancelled or withdrawn, but this happens just occasionally.

References

  • Alexandrova, P., Carammia, M., & Timmermans, A. (2012). Policy punctuations and issue diversity on the European Council agenda. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrova, P., Carammia, M., & Timmermans, A. (2014a). EU high politics: The policy agenda of the European Council, 1975–2011. In F. Foret, & Y. Rittelmeyer (Eds.), The European Council and European Governance. The commanding heights of the European Union (pp. 53–72). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrova, P., Carammia, M., Princen, S., & Timmermans, A. (2014b). Measuring the European Council agenda: Introducing a new approach and dataset. European Union Politics, 15(1), 152–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). Ideas and policy change. Governance, 26(2), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., Breunig, C., Green-Pedersen, C., Jones, B. D., Mortensen, P. B., Nuytemans, M., et al. (2009). Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, D. (2010). Energy policy: Sharp challenges and rising ambitions. In W. Wallace & M. Pollack (Eds.), Policy-making in the European Union (pp. 357–380). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R., Ross, J., & Ross, M. H. (1976). Agenda building as a comparative political process. American Political Science Review, 70(1), 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The “Issue-Attention Cycle”. Public Interest, 28, 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggermont, F. (2012). The changing role of the European Council in the institutional framework of the European Union: Consequences for the European integration process. Mortsel: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foret, F., & Rittelmeyer, Y.-S. (2014). The European Council and European Governance. The commanding heights of the EU. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, S. (2004). Multi-level governance and the European Union. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 107–126). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guiraudon, V. (2000). European integration and migration policy: Vertical policy-making as venue shopping. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood, B., & Peters, G. B. (1983). Policy dynamics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European Integration. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W., Bevan, S., Timmermans, A., Breeman, G., Brouard, S., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., et al. (2011). Effects of the core functions of government on the diversity of executive agendas. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 1001–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D. (2012). The dynamics of agenda expansion and contraction in the U.S. Perspectives on Europe, 42(2), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention. How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2012). From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (2005). Dilemmas of European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, P. B., Green-Pedersen, C., Breeman, G., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., Jennings, W., John, P., et al. (2011). Comparing government agendas: Executive speeches in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 973–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M. C., & Huge, M. (2006). Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: Managing power and participation through the press/policy connection. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(2), 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1994). Agenda-setting in the European community. Journal of European Public Policy, 1(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2001). Agenda-setting in the European Union. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union. Power and policy-making (pp. 77–94). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, N. (1984). Political innovation in America: The politics of policy initiation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pralle, S. B. (2003). Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: The internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy. Journal of Public Policy, 23(3), 233–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Princen, S. (2009). Agenda-setting in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Princen, S. (2011). Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 927–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Princen, S., & Rhinard, M. (2006). Crashing and creeping: agenda-Setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), 1119–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putter, U. (2014). The European Council and the Council. New intergovernmentalism and institutional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhinard, M. (2010). Framing Europe: The policy shaping strategies of the European commission. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijnhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. (1996). The strategy of rhetoric. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B. (2012). Institutionalizing representative democracy in the European Union: The case of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1), 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology and political science. American Political Science Review, 79(2), 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2008). Bargaining power in the European Council. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(3), 685–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, J. (2011). When the grace period is over: Assessing the new member states’ compliance with EU requirements for oil stockholding. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7156–7164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, J., Wetzel, A., & Zapryanova, G. (2014). The EU in crisis: Advancing the debate. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werts, J. (2008). The European Council. London: John Harper Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1979). American politics, then and now. Commentary, 67, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petya Alexandrova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alexandrova, P., Timmermans, A. (2015). Agenda Dynamics on Energy Policy in the European Council. In: Tosun, J., Biesenbender, S., Schulze, K. (eds) Energy Policy Making in the EU. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 28. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6645-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6645-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6644-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6645-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics