Abstract
Policy issues can arrive on the agendas of political institutions following two routes: a low and a high politics one. In the first case, involvement of experts and working groups is envisaged. In the latter, the power of top institutions is emphasized with their tasks of drawing overall strategies, acting as final arbiters or decision-makers and delegating policy proposals downwards. A high politics institution in the multilevel system of the EU is the European Council, whose role in shaping the Union agenda has increased over the years. Analysing the Conclusions issued after meetings of this body, we find that energy is a topic with relatively little overall attention and sensitive to drastic shifts over time. Energy-related issues appearance on the agenda was sometimes the result of focusing events but also represented strategic discussions in the form of policy planning and review. Classifying the statements in the Conclusions of the European Council in categories, we find that the text can be almost equally divided between evaluations or positions, setting of targets and concrete actions. In short, while attracting on average rather limited attention, energy has the power to become salient in times of critical events or strong need of strategic guideline provision. And its appearance on the agenda often results in new initiatives and delegation of action to lower levels of policy making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
After Croatia entered on 1 July 2013, there are 21 more member states than at the time when Peters wrote his essay.
- 2.
The dataset is publicly available at www.policyagendas.eu/data.
- 3.
Not shown in the figure.
- 4.
The data on governmental agendas are based on executive speeches coded within the Comparative Agendas Project (www.comparativeagendas.info).
- 5.
Such statements may or may not be followed by substantive policy proposals.
- 6.
An action can also be cancelled or withdrawn, but this happens just occasionally.
References
Alexandrova, P., Carammia, M., & Timmermans, A. (2012). Policy punctuations and issue diversity on the European Council agenda. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 69–88.
Alexandrova, P., Carammia, M., & Timmermans, A. (2014a). EU high politics: The policy agenda of the European Council, 1975–2011. In F. Foret, & Y. Rittelmeyer (Eds.), The European Council and European Governance. The commanding heights of the European Union (pp. 53–72). New York: Routledge.
Alexandrova, P., Carammia, M., Princen, S., & Timmermans, A. (2014b). Measuring the European Council agenda: Introducing a new approach and dataset. European Union Politics, 15(1), 152–167.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.
Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). Ideas and policy change. Governance, 26(2), 239–258.
Baumgartner, F. R., Breunig, C., Green-Pedersen, C., Jones, B. D., Mortensen, P. B., Nuytemans, M., et al. (2009). Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 603–620.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Buchan, D. (2010). Energy policy: Sharp challenges and rising ambitions. In W. Wallace & M. Pollack (Eds.), Policy-making in the European Union (pp. 357–380). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cobb, R., Ross, J., & Ross, M. H. (1976). Agenda building as a comparative political process. American Political Science Review, 70(1), 126–138.
Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The “Issue-Attention Cycle”. Public Interest, 28, 38–50.
Eggermont, F. (2012). The changing role of the European Council in the institutional framework of the European Union: Consequences for the European integration process. Mortsel: Intersentia.
Foret, F., & Rittelmeyer, Y.-S. (2014). The European Council and European Governance. The commanding heights of the EU. London: Routledge.
George, S. (2004). Multi-level governance and the European Union. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 107–126). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guiraudon, V. (2000). European integration and migration policy: Vertical policy-making as venue shopping. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 251–271.
Hogwood, B., & Peters, G. B. (1983). Policy dynamics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European Integration. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Jennings, W., Bevan, S., Timmermans, A., Breeman, G., Brouard, S., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., et al. (2011). Effects of the core functions of government on the diversity of executive agendas. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 1001–1030.
Jones, B. D. (2012). The dynamics of agenda expansion and contraction in the U.S. Perspectives on Europe, 42(2), 22–28.
Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention. How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2012). From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 1–20.
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
Majone, G. (2005). Dilemmas of European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378.
Mortensen, P. B., Green-Pedersen, C., Breeman, G., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., Jennings, W., John, P., et al. (2011). Comparing government agendas: Executive speeches in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 973–1000.
Nisbet, M. C., & Huge, M. (2006). Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: Managing power and participation through the press/policy connection. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(2), 3–40.
Peters, B. G. (1994). Agenda-setting in the European community. Journal of European Public Policy, 1(1), 9–26.
Peters, B. G. (2001). Agenda-setting in the European Union. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union. Power and policy-making (pp. 77–94). London: Routledge.
Polsby, N. (1984). Political innovation in America: The politics of policy initiation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Pralle, S. B. (2003). Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: The internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy. Journal of Public Policy, 23(3), 233–260.
Princen, S. (2009). Agenda-setting in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Princen, S. (2011). Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 927–943.
Princen, S., & Rhinard, M. (2006). Crashing and creeping: agenda-Setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), 1119–1132.
Putter, U. (2014). The European Council and the Council. New intergovernmentalism and institutional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rhinard, M. (2010). Framing Europe: The policy shaping strategies of the European commission. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijnhoff Publishers.
Riker, W. H. (1996). The strategy of rhetoric. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rittberger, B. (2012). Institutionalizing representative democracy in the European Union: The case of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1), 18–37.
Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Simon, H. A. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology and political science. American Political Science Review, 79(2), 293–304.
Tallberg, J. (2008). Bargaining power in the European Council. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(3), 685–708.
Tosun, J. (2011). When the grace period is over: Assessing the new member states’ compliance with EU requirements for oil stockholding. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7156–7164.
Tosun, J., Wetzel, A., & Zapryanova, G. (2014). The EU in crisis: Advancing the debate. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 195–211.
Werts, J. (2008). The European Council. London: John Harper Publishing.
Wilson, J. Q. (1979). American politics, then and now. Commentary, 67, 39–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alexandrova, P., Timmermans, A. (2015). Agenda Dynamics on Energy Policy in the European Council. In: Tosun, J., Biesenbender, S., Schulze, K. (eds) Energy Policy Making in the EU. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 28. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6645-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6645-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6644-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6645-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)