Abstract
The most critically ill patients can now be treated with life saving mechanical circulatory support. The development of databases to track the outcomes of patients with critical illness has been ongoing for much of the last two decades. Clinicians who engage in the use of mechanical circulatory support are interested in the analysis of outcomes of patients treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and Ventricular Assist Devices (VAD), with the ultimate aim of improvement in the quality of care.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gaffney AM, Wildhirt SM, Griffin MJ, et al. Extracorporeal life support. BMJ. 2010;341:c5317.
International Summary of The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. [www.elsonet.org].
Bembea MM, Annich G, Rycus P, et al. Variability in anticoagulation management of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an international survey. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(2):e77–84.
Vats A, Pettignano R, Culler S, Wright J. Cost of extracorporeal life support in pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(9):1587–92.
Freeman CL, Bennett TD, Casper TC, et al. Pediatric and neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: does center volume impact mortality? Crit Care Med. 2013;42(3):1–8.
Karamlou T, Vafaeezadeh M, Parrish AM, et al. Increased extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center case volume is associated with improved extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survival among pediatric patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(2):470–5.
Conrad SA, Rycus PT. The Registry of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. In: Annich GM, Lynch WR, Maclaren G, Wilson JM, Bartlett RH, editors. ECMO: extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support in critical care. 4th ed. Ann Arbor: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization; 2012. p. 87–104.
Paden ML, Conrad SA, Rycus PT, Thiagarajan RR. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Report 2012. ASAIO J. 2012;59(3):202–10.
Barrett CS, Jaggers JJ, Cook EF, et al. Outcomes of neonates undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support using centrifugal versus roller blood pumps. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(5):1635–41.
Barrett CS, Jaggers JJ, Cook EF, et al. Pediatric ECMO outcomes: comparison of centrifugal versus roller blood pumps using propensity score matching. ASAIO J. 2013;59(2):145–51.
Fleming GM, Gurney JG, Donohue JE, et al. Mechanical component failures in 28,171 neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation courses from 1987 to 2006. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;10(4):439–44.
Polito A, Barrett CS, Wypij D, et al. Neurologic complications in neonates supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. An analysis of ELSO registry data. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(9):1594–601.
Rollins MD, Hubbard A, Zabrocki L, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation trends for pediatric respiratory failure and central nervous system injury. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(1):68–75.
Zabrocki LA, Brogan TV, Statler KD, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pediatric respiratory failure: survival and predictors of mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(2):364–70.
Thiagarajan RR, Laussen PC, Rycus PT, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to aid cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infants and children. Circulation. 2007;116(15):1693–700.
Fraser Jr CD, Jaquiss RD, Rosenthal DN, et al. Prospective trial of a pediatric ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(6):532–41.
Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Stevenson LW, et al. INTERMACS database for durable devices for circulatory support: first annual report. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27(10):1065–73.
Holman WL. Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS): what have we learned and what will we learn? Circulation. 2012;126(11):1401–6.
Shann KG, Giacomuzzi CR, Harness L, Myers GJ, Paugh TA, Mellas N, Groom RC, Gomez D, Thuys CA, Charette K, Ojito JW, Tinius-Juliani J, Calaritis C, McRobb CM, Parpard M, Chancy T, Bacha E, Cooper DS, Jacobs JP, Likosky DS, on behalf of the International Consortium for Evidence-Based Perfusion. Complications relating to perfusion and extracorporeal circulation associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease: consensus definitions from the Multi-Societal Database Committee for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. In: 2008 supplement to Cardiology in the Young: databases and the assessment of complications associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease, prepared by: The Multi-Societal Database Committee for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, MD, editor. Cardiol Young. 2008;18(Suppl 2):206–14.
Jacobs JP, editor. 2008 Supplement to Cardiology in the Young: databases and the assessment of complications associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease, prepared by: The Multi-Societal Database Committee for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. Cardiol Young. 2008;18(Suppl S2):1–530.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooper, D.S., Morales, D.L.S., del Corral, M., Paden, M.L., Thiagarajan, R.R. (2015). Databases for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Ventricular Assist Devices. In: Barach, P., Jacobs, J., Lipshultz, S., Laussen, P. (eds) Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6587-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6587-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6586-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6587-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)