Skip to main content

Databases for Assessing the Outcomes of the Treatment of Patients with Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Disease: The Perspective of Critical Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care

Abstract

Several barriers exist that make measuring critical care outcomes and quality a challenge. Particularly in the field of pediatric cardiac critical care it can be difficult to disentangle an intensive care unit’s contribution to patient outcome from those of other services (e.g. surgery), and appropriate risk-adjustment remains an elusive goal. Databases provide a key source of information that can be used to overcome some of these barriers. We explain the key database components necessary to provide clinicians and researchers with the foundation to measure and improve quality in this clinical arena. Databases that are currently used in the critical care community are described, including the Virtual PICU System (VPS) database. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how to move from simply assessing patient outcomes using databases to achieving quality improvement through collaborative. We review new collaborative in pediatric cardiac critical care and cardiac surgery, the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4), that is implementing the lessons learned from successful quality improvement pioneers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boneva RS, Botto LD, Moore CA, Yang Q, Correa A, Erickson JD. Mortality associated with congenital heart defects in the United States: trends and racial disparities, 1979–1997. Circulation. 2001;103:2376–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K. Center-specific differences in mortality: preliminary analyses using the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) method. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Newburger JW, Spray TL, Moller JH, Iezzoni LI. Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:110–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Lacour-Gayet FG, et al. Stratification of complexity improves the utility and accuracy of outcomes analysis in a multi-institutional congenital heart surgery database: application of the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) and Aristotle Systems in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) congenital heart surgery database. Pediatr Cardiol. 2009;30:1117–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs JP, Lacour-Gayet FG, Jacobs ML, et al. Initial application in the STS congenital database of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1635–49; discussion -49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobs ML, Jacobs JP, Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Clarke DR, Lacour-Gayet F. Stratification of complexity: the risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery-1 method and the Aristotle complexity score–past, present, and future. Cardiol Young. 2008;18 Suppl 2:163–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Maruszewski B, et al. Initial application in the EACTS and STS congenital heart surgery databases of an empirically derived methodology of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:775–9; discussion 779–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Slater A, Shann F, Pearson G, Paediatric Index of Mortality Study Group. PIM2: a revised version of the paediatric index of mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:278–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Czaja AS, Scanlon MC, Kuhn EM, Jeffries HE. Performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 for pediatric cardiac surgery patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12:184–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Metnitz PG, Lang T, Vesely H, Valentin A, Le Gall JR. Ratios of observed to expected mortality are affected by differences in case mix and quality of care. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:1466–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Murphy-Filkins R, Teres D, Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW. Effect of changing patient mix on the performance of an intensive care unit severity-of-illness model: how to distinguish a general from a specialty intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1968–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel PA, Grant BJ. Application of mortality prediction systems to individual intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:977–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Straney L, Clements A, Parslow RC, et al. Paediatric index of mortality 3: an updated model for predicting mortality in pediatric intensive care*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14:673–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE. PRISM III: an updated pediatric risk of mortality score. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:743–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mildh L, Pettila V, Sairanen H, Rautiainen P. Predictive value of paediatric risk of mortality score and risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery score after paediatric open-heart surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6:628–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobs JP. Introduction–databases and the assessment of complications associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease. Cardiol Young. 2008;18 Suppl 2:1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Mavroudis C, et al. Nomenclature and databases for the surgical treatment of congenital cardiac disease–an updated primer and an analysis of opportunities for improvement. Cardiol Young. 2008;18 Suppl 2:38–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang RK, Klitzner TS. Can regionalization decrease the number of deaths for children who undergo cardiac surgery? A theoretical analysis. Pediatrics. 2002;109:173–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bazzani LG, Marcin JP. Case volume and mortality in pediatric cardiac surgery patients in California, 1998–2003. Circulation. 2007;115:2652–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Welke KF, Diggs BS, Karamlou T, Ungerleider RM. The relationship between hospital surgical case volumes and mortality rates in pediatric cardiac surgery: a national sample, 1988–2005. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:889–96; discussion -96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pasquali SK, Jacobs JP, Shook GJ, et al. Linking clinical registry data with administrative data using indirect identifiers: implementation and validation in the congenital heart surgery population. Am Heart J. 2010;160:1099–104.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA. 1996;275:841–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Share DA, Campbell DA, Birkmeyer N, et al. How a regional collaborative of hospitals and physicians in Michigan cut costs and improved the quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:636–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael G. Gaies MD, MPH, MSc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaies, M.G., Jeffries, H.E., Wetzel, R., Schwartz, S.M. (2015). Databases for Assessing the Outcomes of the Treatment of Patients with Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Disease: The Perspective of Critical Care. In: Barach, P., Jacobs, J., Lipshultz, S., Laussen, P. (eds) Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6587-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6587-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6586-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6587-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics