Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Independent Component Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neural Networks and Statistical Learning

Abstract

Imagine that you are attending a cocktail party, the surrounding is full of chatting and noise, and somebody is talking about you. In this case, your ears are particularly sensitive to this speaker. This is the cocktail-party problem, which can be solved by blind source separation (BSS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akaho, S., Kiuchi, Y., & Umeyama, S. (1999) MICA: Multidimensional independent component analysis. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 927–932), Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almeida, L. B. (2003). MISEP–Linear and nonlinear ICA based on mutual information. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4, 1297–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amari, S. I., Cichocki, A., & Yang, H. (1996). A new learning algorithm for blind signal separation. In D. S. Touretzky, M. C. Mozer, & M. E. Hasselmo (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 8, pp. 757–763). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amari, S., Douglas, S. C., Cichocki, A., & Yang, H. H. (1997). Multichannel blind deconvolution and equalization using the natural gradient. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (pp. 101–104).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amari, S. (1998). Natural gradient works efficiently in learning. Neural Computation, 10(2), 251–276.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Amari, S. (1999). Natural gradient learning for over- and under-complete bases in ICA. Neural Computation, 11, 1875–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Astakhov, S. A., Stogbauer, H., Kraskov, A., & Grassberger, P. (2006). Monte Carlo algorithm for least dependent non-negative mixture decomposition. Analytical Chemistry, 78(5), 1620–1627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Babaie-Zadeh, M., Jutten, C., & Mansour, A. (2006). Sparse ICA via cluster-wise PCA. Neurocomputing, 69, 1458–1466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baldi, P., & Hornik, K. (1989). Neural networks for principal component analysis: Learning from examples without local minima. Neural Networks, 2, 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7(6), 1129–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bingham, E., & Hyvarinen, A. (2000). ICA of complex valued signals: A fast and robust deflationary algorithm. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (Vol. 3, pp. 357–362), Como, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blanco, D., Mulgrew, B., McLaughlin, S., Ruiz, D. P., & Carrion, M. C. (2006). The use of ICA in multiplicative noise. Neurocomputing, 69, 1435–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blanco, D., Mulgrew, B., Ruiz, D. P., & Carrion, M. C. (2007). Independent component analysis in signals with multiplicative noise using fourth-order statistics. Signal Processing, 87, 1917–1932.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Blythe, D. A. J., von Bnau, P., Meinecke, F. C., & Muller, K.-R. (2012). Feature extraction for change-point detection using stationary subspace analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 23(4), 631–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bohmer, W., Grunewalder, S., Nickisch, H., & Obermayer, K. (2012). Generating feature spaces for linear algorithms with regularized sparse kernel slow feature analysis. Machine Learning, 89, 67–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Boscolo, R., Pan, H., & Roychowdhury, V. P. (2004). Independent component analysis based on nonparametric density estimation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 15(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burel, G. (1992). Blind separation of sources: A nonlinear neural algorithm. Neural Networks, 5, 937–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Calhoun, V., & Adali, T. (2006) Complex infomax: convergence and approximation of infomax with complex nonlinearities. Journal of VLSI Signal Processing, 44, 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cardoso, J.-F., & Souloumiac, A. (1993). Blind beamforming for non-gaussian signals. IEE Proceedings—F, 140(6), 362–370.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cardoso, J.-F., & Laheld, B. H. (1996). Equivariant adaptive source separation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 44(12), 3017–3030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cardoso, J.-F. (1997). Infomax and maximum likelihood for blind source separation. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 4(4), 112–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cardoso, J.-F. (1999). High-order contrasts for independent component analysis. Neural Computation, 11, 157–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cardoso, J.-F. (2003). Dependence, correlation and Gaussianity in independent component analysis. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4, 1177–1203.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Cardoso, J.-F., & Adali, T. (2006). The maximum likelihood approach to complex ICA. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 673–676), Toulouse, France.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chan, T.-H., Ma, W.-K., Chi, C.-Y., & Wang, Y. (2008). A convex analysis framework for blind separation of non-negative sources. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 56(10), 5120–5134.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi, H., Kim, S., & Choi, S. (2004). Trust-region learning for ICA. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (pp. 41–46). Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Choi, H., & Choi, S. (2007). A relative trust-region algorithm for independent component analysis. Neurocomputing, 70, 1502–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi, S., Cichocki, A., & Amari, S. (2002). Equivariant nonstationary source separation. Neural Networks, 15, 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Choi, S. (2006). Differential learning algorithms for decorrelation and independent component analysis. Neural Networks, 19, 1558–1567.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Cichocki, A., Douglas, S. C., & Amari, S. (1998). Robust techniques for independent component analysis (ICA) with noisy data. Neurocomputing, 22, 113–129.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Comon, P. (1994). Independent component analysis–A new concept? Signal Processing, 36(3), 287–314.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Correa, N., Adali, T., Li, Y., & Calhoun, V. D. (2005). Comparison of blind source separation algorithms for fMRI using a new matlab toolbox: GIFT. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 401–404), Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Douglas, S. C. (2007). Fixed-point algorithms for the blind separation of arbitrary complex-valued non-Gaussian signal mixtures. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Article ID 36525.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Douglas, S. C., & Chao, J.-C. (2007). Simple, robust, and memory-efficient FastICA algorithms using the Huber M-estimator cost function. Journal of VLSI Signal Processing, 48, 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Erdogmus, D., Hild, K. E, I. I., Rao, Y. N., & Principe, J. C. (2004). Minimax mutual information approach for independent component analysis. Neural Computation, 16, 1235–1252.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Eriksson, J., & Koivunen, V. (2004). Identifiability, separability and uniqueness of linear ICA models. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 11(7), 601–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Eriksson, J., & Koivunen, V. (2006). Complex random vectors and ICA models: Identifiability, uniqueness, and separability. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(3), 1017–1029.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Fiori, S. (2000). Blind separation of circularly-distributed sources by neural extended APEX algorithm. Neurocomputing, 34, 239–252.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Fiori, S. (2003). Extended Hebbian learning for blind separation of complex-valued sources sources. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, 50(4), 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Giannakopoulos, X., Karhunen, J., & Oja, E. (1999). An experimental comparison of neural algorithms for independent component analysis and blind separation. International Journal of Neural Systems, 9(2), 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hara, S., Kawahara, Y., Washio, T., von Bunau, P., Tokunaga, T., & Yumoto, K. (2012). Separation of stationary and non-stationary sources with a generalized eigenvalue problem. Neural Networks, 33, 7–20.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Haritopoulos, M., Yin, H., & Allinson, N. M. (2002). Image denoising using self-organizing map-based nonlinear independent component analysis. Neural Networks, 15, 1085–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hild, K. E, I. I., Attias, H. T., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2008). An expectation-maximization method for spatio-temporal blind source separation using an AR-MOG source model. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 19(3), 508–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hyvarinen, A., & Oja, E. (1997). A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Computation, 9(7), 1483–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hyvarinen, A. (1998). New approximations of differential entropy for independent component analysis and projection pursuit. In M. I. Jordan, M. J. Kearns, & S. A. Solla (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing (Vol. 10, pp. 273–279). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hyvarinen, A., & Oja, E. (1998). Independent component analysis by general non-linear Hebbian-like learning rules. Signal Processing, 64, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hyvarinen, A., & Pajunen, P. (1999). Nonlinear independent component analysis: Existence and uniqueness results. Neural Networks, 12, 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hyvarinen, A. (1999). Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10(3), 626–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hyvarinen, A., Sarela, J., & Vigario, R. (1999). Spikes and bumps: Artefacts generated by independent component analysis with insufficient sample size. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on ICA (pp. 425–429), Aussois, France.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hyvarinen, A., & Hoyer, P. O. (2000). Emergence of phase and shift invariant features by decomposition of natural images into independent feature subspaces. Neural Computation, 12(7), 1705–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hyvarinen, A. (2001). Blind source separation by nonstationarity of variance: A cumulant-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 12(6), 1471–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hyvarinen, A., Hoyer, P. O., & Inki, M. (2001). Topographic independent component analysis. Neural Computation, 13, 1527–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hyvarinen, A., & Raju, K. (2002). Imposing sparsity on the mixing matrix in independent component analysis. Neurocomputing, 49, 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hyvarinen, A., & Koster, U. (2006). FastISA: A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent subspace analysis. In Proceedings of the 14th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 371–376), Bruges, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Igual, J., Vergara, L., Camacho, A., & Miralles, R. (2003). Independent component analysis with prior information about the mixing matrix. Neurocomputing, 50, 419–438.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Javidi, S., Took, C. C., & Mandic, D. P. (2011). Fast independent component analysis algorithm for quaternion valued signals. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 22(12), 1967–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jutten, C., & Herault, J. (1991). Blind separation of sources. Part I. An adaptive algorithm based on a neuromimetric architecture. Signal Processing, 24(1), 1–10.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Karhunen, J., Oja, E., Wang, L., Vigario, R., & Joutsensalo, J. (1997). A class of neural networks for independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 8(3), 486–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Karhunen, J., & Pajunen, P. (1997). Blind source separation and tracking using nonlinear PCA criterion: A least-squares approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE Internal Conference on Neural Networks (Vol. 4, pp. 2147–2152), Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Karhunen, J., Pajunen, P., & Oja, E. (1998). The nonlinear PCA criterion in blind source separation: Relations with other approaches. Neurocomputing, 22(1), 5–20.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Karhunen, J., Malaroiu, S., & Ilmoniemi, M. (1999). Local linear independent component analysis based on clustering. International Journal of Neural Systems, 10(6), 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kawamoto, M., Matsuoka, K., & Ohnishi, N. (1998). A method of blind separation for convolved nonstationary signals. Neurocomputing, 22, 157–171.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Kim, T. (2010). Real-time independent vector analysis for convolutive blind source separation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, 57(7), 1431–1438.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  64. Klampfl, S., Legenstein, R., & Maass, W. (2009). Spiking neurons can learn to solve information bottleneck problems and extract independent components. Neural Computation, 21, 911–959.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  65. Kokkinakis, K., & Nandi, A. K. (2007). Generalized gamma density-based score functions for fast and flexible ICA. Signal Processing, 87, 1156–1162.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Koldovsky, Z., Tichavsky, P., & Oja, E. (2005). Cramer-Rao lower bound for linear independent component analysis. In Proceedings of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (Vol. 3, pp. 581–584), Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Koldovsky, Z., Tichavsky, P., & Oja, E. (2006). Efficient variant of algorithm FastICA for independent component analysis attaining the Cramer-Rao lower bound. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 17(5), 1265–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Kompella, V. R., Luciw, M., & Schmidhuber, J. (2012). Incremental slow feature analysis: Adaptive low-complexity slow feature updating from high-dimensional input streams. Neural Computation, 24(11), 2994–3024.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Learned-Miller, E. G., & Fisher, J. W, I. I. I. (2003). ICA using spacings estimates of entropy. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4, 1271–1295.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  70. Lee, T.-W., Girolami, M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1999). Indepedent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources. Neural Computation, 11(2), 417–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Li, H., & Adali, T. (2008). A class of complex ICA algorithms based on the kurtosis cost function. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 19(3), 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Li, X.-L., & Adali, T. (2010). Complex independent component analysis by entropy bound minimization. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, 57(7), 1417–1430.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  73. Li, H., & Adali, T. (2010). Algorithms for complex ML ICA and their stability analysis using Wirtinger calculus. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(12), 6156–6167.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  74. Lu, W., & Rajapakse, J. C. (2003). Eliminating indeterminacy in ICA. Neurocomputing, 50, 271–290.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Lu, W., & Rajapakse, J. C. (2005). Approach and applications of constrained ICA. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 16(1), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Lu, W., & Rajapakse, J. C. (2006). ICA with reference. Neurocomputing, 69, 2244–2257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Matsuoka, K., Ohya, M., & Kawamoto, M. (1995). A neural net for blind separation of nonstationary signals. Neural Networks, 8(3), 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Mollah, M. N. H., Eguchi, S., & Minami, M. (2007). Robust prewhitening for ICA by minimizing \(\beta \)-divergence and its application to FastICA. Neural Processing Letters, 25, 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Murata, N., Ikeda, S., & Ziehe, A. (2001). An approach to blind source separation based on temporal structure of speech signals. Neurocomputing, 41, 1–24.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. Naik, G. R., & Kumar, D. K. (2009). Determining number of independent sources in undercomplete mixture. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Article ID 694850.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Novey, M., & Adali, T. (2008). Complex ICA by negentropy maximization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 19(4), 596–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Novey, M., & Adali, T. (2008). On extending the complex FastICA algorithm to noncircular sources. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 56(5), 2148–2154.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  83. Oja, E., & Plumbley, M. (2004). Blind separation of positive sources by globally convergent gradient search. Neural Computation, 16, 1811–1825.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Oja, E., & Yuan, Z. (2006). The FastICA algorithm revisited: convergence analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 17(6), 1370–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ollila, E., & Koivunen, V. (2009). Complex ICA using generalized uncorrelating transform. Signal Processing, 89, 365–377.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. Ollila, E. (2010). The deflation-based FastICA estimator: Statistical analysis revisited. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(3), 1527–1541.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  87. Pajunen, P. (1998). Blind source separation using algorithmic information theory. Neurocomputing, 22, 35–48.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Park, H.-M., Oh, S.-H., & Lee, S.-Y. (2006). A modified infomax algorithm for blind signal separation. Neurocomputing, 70, 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Plumbley, M. D. (2003). Algorithms for nonnegative independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 14(3), 534–543.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ristaniemi, T., & Joutsensalo, J. (2002). Advanced ICA-based receivers for block fading DS-CDMA channels. Signal Processing, 82(3), 417–431.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. Samadi, S., Babaie-Zadeh, M., & Jutten, C. (2006). Quasi-optimal EASI algorithm based on the Score Function Difference (SFD). Neurocomputing, 69, 1415–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Sarela, J., & Vigario, R. (2003). Overlearning in marginal distribution-based ICA: Analysis and solutions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4, 1447–1469.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  93. Sawada, H., Mukai, R., Araki, S., & Makino, S. (2004). A robust and precise method for solving the permutation problem of frequency-domain blind source separation. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 12(5), 530–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Schell, S. V., & Gardner, W. A. (1995). Programmable canonical correlation analysis: A flexible framework for blind adaptive spatial filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 42(12), 2898–2908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Schobben, L., & Sommen, W. (2002). A frequency domain blind signal separation method based on decorrelation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50, 1855–1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Shen, H., Kleinsteuber, M., & Huper, K. (2008). Local convergence analysis of FastICA and related algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 19(6), 1022–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Smaragdis, P. (1998). Blind separation of convolved mixtures in the frequency domain. Neurocomputing, 22, 21–34.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. Tan, Y., Wang, J., & Zurada, J. M. (2001). Nonlinear blind source separation using a radial basis function network. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 12(1), 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Tichavsky, P., Koldovsky, Z., & Oja, E. (2005). Asymptotic performance of the FastICA algorithm for independent component analysis and its improvements. In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing (pp. 1084–1089), Bordeaux, France.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Van Hulle, M. M. (2008). Sequential fixed-point ICA based on mutual information minimization. Neural Computation, 20, 1344–1365.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. Van Hulle, M. M. (2008). Constrained subspace ICA based on mutual information optimization directly. Neural Computation, 20, 964–973.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  102. Von Bunau, P., Meinecke, F. C., Kiraly, F. C., & Muller, K.-R. (2009). Finding stationary subspaces in multivariate time series. Physical Review Letters, 103(21), 214101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Wang, F.-Y., Chi, C.-Y., Chan, T.-H., & Wang, Y. (2010). Nonnegative least-correlated component analysis for separation of dependent sources by volume maximization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(5), 875–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Wiskott, L., & Sejnowski, T. (2002). Slow feature analysis: Unsupervised learning of invariances. Neural Computation, 14(4), 715–770.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  105. Yadav, R., Agarwal, R., & Swamy, M. N. S. (2012). Model-based seizure detection for intracranial EEG recordings. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 59, 1419–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Yadav, R., Agarwal, R., & Swamy, M. N. S. (2012). Morphology-based automatic seizure detector for intracerebral EEG recordings. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 59, 1871–1881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Ye, M. (2006). Global convergence analysis of a discrete time nonnegative ICA algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 17(1), 253–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Zarzoso, V., & Comon, P. (2010). Robust independent component analysis by iterative maximization of the kurtosis contrast with algebraic optimal step size. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 21(2), 248–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Zarzoso, V., Comon, P., & Phlypo, R. (2010). A contrast function for independent component analysis without permutation ambiguity. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 21(5), 863–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Zhang, K., & Chan, L. (2008). Minimal nonlinear distortion principle for nonlinear independent component analysis. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 2455–2487.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  111. Zheng, C.-H., Huang, D.-S., Sun, Z.-L., Lyu, M. R., & Lok, T.-M. (2006). Nonnegative independent component analysis based on minimizing mutual information technique. Neurocomputing, 69, 878–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Zibulevsky, M. (2003). Blind source separation with relative Newton method. In Proceedings of ICA Conference (pp. 897–902), Nara, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Ziegaus, Ch., & Lang, E. W. (2004). A neural implementation ofthe JADE algorithm (nJADE) using higher-order neurons. Neurocomputing, 56, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Enjoyor Labs, Enjoyor Inc., Hangzhou, China

    Ke-Lin Du & M. N. S. Swamy

  2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Ke-Lin Du

Authors
  1. Ke-Lin Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. N. S. Swamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke-Lin Du .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Du, KL., Swamy, M.N.S. (2014). Independent Component Analysis. In: Neural Networks and Statistical Learning. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5571-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5571-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5570-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5571-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation