Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of Four Models of Total Knee-Replacement Prostheses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Classic Papers in Orthopaedics

Abstract

Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zahiri CA, et al. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(8):890–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(4):958–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bach CM, et al. Correlation between radiographic assessment and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2009;16(3):207–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sadoghi P, et al. Radiolucent lines in low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a blinded and matched case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:142.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bach CM, et al. Reproducible assessment of radiolucent lines in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;434:183–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Hadithy N, et al. How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41(5):493–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK

    Nick Caplan PhD

  2. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

    Deiary F. Kader FRCS (Ed), FRCS (Glas), MFSEM (UK)

Authors
  1. Nick Caplan PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deiary F. Kader FRCS (Ed), FRCS (Glas), MFSEM (UK)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Caplan PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, United Kingdom

    Paul A. Banaszkiewicz

  2. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, United Kingdom

    Deiary F. Kader

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caplan, N., Kader, D.F. (2014). A Comparison of Four Models of Total Knee-Replacement Prostheses. In: Banaszkiewicz, P., Kader, D. (eds) Classic Papers in Orthopaedics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5450-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5451-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation