Skip to main content

End-Quality Control in the Manufacturing of Electrical Motors

  • Chapter
Case Studies in Control

Abstract

Guaranteeing 100 % fault free products at minimal operational costs has become a widely accepted paradigm in practically all branches of manufacturing. In turn, the entire system of quality control has to be properly designed, with particular emphasis on final quality assessment of the products. In this chapter we present an advanced system for quality assessment of electrical motors which has been developed and successfully implemented in the final stage of the manufacturing process. The system is aimed at detecting and isolating the tiniest defects that can be caused by assembly errors as well as errors in input materials and assembly parts. The core of the system relies on innovative hardware and software modules for feature extraction which perform analysis of commutation, vibration analysis, and sound analysis. The design and performance of the diagnostic algorithms tailored to a variety of mechanical and electrical faults are presented in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    MES stands for Manufacturing Execution System.

  2. 2.

    The Cauchy principal value is a means for assigning values to ill-defined integrals.

  3. 3.

    A monocomponent signal is a signal in which the amplitude of only one frequency component varies as a function of time [5].

  4. 4.

    ACID stands for atomicity, isolation, consistency and durability. Atomicity requires that all operations within the transaction either all occur, or nothing occurs, while the consistency property ensures that any transaction will bring the database from one valid state to another, and the isolation property ensures that the concurrent execution of transactions results in the same state as would be obtained if transactions are executed serially. Durability guarantees that the committed transactions will exist permanently.

References

  1. Albas E, Arikan T, Kuzkaya C (2006) In process motor testing results using model based fault detection approach. http://www.maintenanceworld.com/Articles/albasArikankuzkaya/emcw_2001_artesis_paper.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antoni J, Randall RB (2006) The spectral kurtosis: a useful tool for characterising non-stationary signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:282–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Antoni J (2007) Cyclic spectral analysis in practice. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:597–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benko U, Petrovčič J, Musizza B, Juričić Ð(2008) A system for automated final quality assessment in the manufacturing of vacuum cleaner motors. In: Preprints of the 17th IFAC world congress, Seoul, Korea, pp 7399–7404

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boashash B (1992) Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency—Part 1: Fundamentals. Proc IEEE 80(4):520–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boškoski P (2012) Condition monitoring of mechanical drives: feature extraction and fault diagnosis methods. PhD Thesis, Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boškoski P, Petrovčič J, Musizza B, Juričić Ð(2010) Detection of lubrication starved bearings in electrical motors by means of vibration analysis. Tribol Int 43(9):1683–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boškoski P, Petrovčič J, Musizza B, Juričić Ð(2011) An end-quality assessment system for electronically commutated motors based on evidential reasoning. Expert Syst Appl 38(11):13816–13826

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chantler MJ, Wyatt TK, Aldea A, McGunnigle G (1999) A taxonomy of user requirements for model-based diagnostic systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th IFAC world congress, Beijing. Paper no. P-7e-05-5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards S, Lees AW, Friswell MI (1998) Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Shock Vib Dig 30(1):4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng Y, Schlindwein FS (2009) Normalized wavelet packets quantifiers for condition monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(3):712–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Filbert D, Gühmann C (1994) Fault diagnosis on bearings of electric motors by estimating the current spectrum. In: IFAC/IMACS symposium on fault detection supervision and safety for technical process, Helsinki, Finland, pp 714–719

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gühmann C, Filbert D (1991) Fault diagnosis of electric low-power motors by analyzing the current signal. In: IFAC/IMACS symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes, Baden-Baden, Germany, vol 1, pp 67–72

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ho D, Randall RB (2000) Optimisation of bearing diagnostic techniques using simulated and actual bearing fault signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 14(5):763–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Isermann R (2006) Fault-diagnosis systems: an introduction from fault detection to fault tolerance. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(6):1483–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Michiguchi Y, Tanisaka S (1986) Spark monitor device for current collectors. Patent No. US4577151

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nandi S, Toliyat HA (1999) Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of electrical machines—a review. In: Proceedings of the IEEE-IEMDC conference, Seattle, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petrovčič J, Juričić Ð, Tinta D (2004) The detector and the aparatus for measuring the sparking intensity in collector motors. Patent no. 21381, Office of the Republic of Slovenia for Intellectual Property, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rakar A, Juričić Ð, Strmčnik S (2000) A concept of the teaching model-based condition monitoring. In: Edelmayer AM (ed) Proceedings of the 4th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (SAFEPROCESS’2000), Budapest, Hungary, pp 786–791

    Google Scholar 

  21. Randall RB (2002) State of the art in monitoring rotating machinery. In: Proceedings of ISMA, Lueven, September, vol 4, pp 1457–1477

    Google Scholar 

  22. Randall RB, Antoni J, Chobsaard S (2001) The relationship between spectral correlation and envelope analysis in the diagnostics of bearing faults and other cyclostationary machine signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 15:945–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shiozaki J (1986) Commutation spark monitoring apparatus for rotary electric machine. Patent No. JP61004440

    Google Scholar 

  24. Staszewski WJ (1998) Wavelet based compression and feature selection for vibration analysis. J Sound Vib 211:735–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tandon N, Choudhury A (1999) A review of vibration and acoustic measurement methods for the detection of defects in rolling element bearings. Tribol Int 32:469–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tinta D, Petrovčič J, Benko U, Juričić Ð, Rakar A, Žele M, Tavčar J, Rejec J, Stefanovska A (2005) Fault diagnosis of vacuum cleaner motors. Control Eng Pract 13:177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vetter T, Weber H, Grossehelweg J (1994). Vollautomatische Fehlerdiagnose in der Serienfretigung von Elektromotoren. VDI-Tagung

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vogelsang&Benning (2007) Routine test system for vacuum cleaner fans. http://www.vogelsangbenning.de/en/index.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the engineering team from the company Domel for their contribution to the project. We are also grateful to the operators who openly shared their expertise on motor quality assessment. Thanks go to Andrej Biček for contributing Fig. 8.1. The authors are grateful to the Slovenian Research Agency for support under grant No. P2-0001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Juričić, Ð. et al. (2013). End-Quality Control in the Manufacturing of Electrical Motors. In: Strmčnik, S., Juričić, Đ. (eds) Case Studies in Control. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5176-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5176-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5175-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5176-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics