Abstract
This chapter investigates what benefits could be achieved from model-based ammonia nitrogen controllers in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in comparison with PI controllers. The controllers addressed are a model-based feedforward-feedback controller and a model predictive controller (MPC). Validation of the controllers was performed both in simulation and on a real plant in the context of various performance criteria related to an effluent ammonia limit violation and air consumption. The simulation results indicate that the feedforward-feedback controller and MPC result in reduced air consumption compared to the PI controller while achieving the same or better ammonia removal. When model-based ammonia controllers are applied to a full scale pilot plant they have to be simplified and properly accommodated. The application of controllers confirmed that the feedforward-feedback controller and MPC give better results than the PI controller. The main reason for this lies in the fact that they use the additional measurable disturbance of the influent ammonia. Interestingly, at the real plant poorer results are obtained with the MPC than with the feedforward-feedback controller. The explanation for this could be associated with the various limitations in applying a more complex MPC in a real environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alex J, Tschepetzki R, Jumar U (2002) Predictive control of nitrogen removal in WWTP using parsimonious models. In: Proceedings 15th IFAC world congress on automatic control, Barcelona, Spain
Åstrom KJ, Hägglund T (1995) PID controllers: theory, design and tuning. ISA, International Society for Measurement and Control
Charef A, Ghauch A, Martin-Bouyer M (2000) An adaptive and predictive control strategy for an activated sludge process. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 23(5):529–534
Copp JB (2002) The COST simulation Benchmark—description and simulator manual. ISBN 92-894-1658-0. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
Gerkšič S, Strmčnik S, van den Boom T (2008) Feedback action in predictive control: an experimental case study. Control Eng Pract 16(3):321–332
Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, van Loosdrecht M (2000) Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Publishing, London
Henze M, Harremoës P, la Cour Jansen J, Arvin E (2001) Wastewater treatment, biological and chemical processes, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin
Hoen K, Shuhen M, Köhne M (1996) Control of nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment plants with predenitrification, depending on the actual purification capacity. Water Sci Technol 33(1):223–236
Holenda B, Domokos E, Redey A, Fazakas J (2008) Dissolved oxygen control of the activated sludge wastewater treatment process using model predictive control. Comput Chem Eng 32:1270–1278
Ingildsen P (2002) Realising full-scale control in wastewater treatment systems using in situ nutrient sensors. PhD thesis, Department of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation, Lund University, Sweden
Kandare G, Nevado Reviriego A (2011) Adaptive predictive expert control of dissolved oxygen concentration in a wastewater treatment plant. Water Sci Technol 64(5):1130–1136
Krause K, Böcker K, Londong J (2002) Simulation of a nitrification control concept considering influent ammonium load. Water Sci Technol 45(4–5):413–420
Lindberg CF (1997) Control and estimation strategies applied to the activated sludge process. PhD Thesis, Department of Systems and Control, Uppsala University, Sweden
Maciejowski JM (2002) Predictive control with constraints. Prentice Hall, Harlow
Marsili-Libelli S, Giunti L (2002) Fuzzy predictive control for nitrogen removal in biological wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 45(4–5):37–44
Meyer U, Popel HJ (2003) Fuzzy-control for improved nitrogen removal and energy saving in wwt-plants with pre-denitrification. Water Sci Technol 47(11):69–76
O’Brien M, Mack J, Lennox B, Lovett D, Wall A (2011) Model predictive control of an activated sludge process: a case study. Control Eng Pract 19:54–61
Ødegaard H, Rusten B, Westrum T (1994) A new moving bed biofilm reactor—applications and results. Water Sci Technol 29(10–11):157–165
Olsson G, Newell B (1999) Wastewater treatment systems, modelling, diagnosis and control. IWA Publishing, London
Peng Y, Vrančić D, Hanus R (1996) Anti-windup, bumpless, and conditioned transfer techniques for PID controllers. Control Syst Mag 16:48–57
Piotrowski R, Brdys MA, Konarczak K, Duzinkiewicz K, Chotkowski W (2008) Hierarchical dissolved oxygen control for activated sludge processes. Control Eng Pract 16:114–131
Rosen C, Larsson M, Jeppsson U, Yuan Z (2002) A framework for extreme-event control in wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 45(4–5):299–308
Shen W, Chen X, Pons MN, Corriou J (2009) Model predictive control for wastewater treatment process with feedforward compensation. Chem Eng J 155(1–2):161–174
Shinskey FG (1988) Process control systems. McGraw-Hill, New York
Sotomayor Oscar AZ, Park Song W, Garcia C (2002) MPC control of a predenitrification plant using linear subspace models. Comput-Aided Chem Eng 10:553–558
Stare A, Vrečko D, Hvala N (2006) Modeling, identification, and validation of models for predictive ammonia control in a wastewater treatment plant—a case study. ISA Trans 45:159–174
Stare A, Vrečko D, Hvala N, Strmčnik S (2007) Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs. Water Res 41(9):2004–2014
Steffens MA, Lant PA (1999) Multivariable control of nutrient-removing activated sludge systems. Water Res 33(12):2864–2878
Suescun J, Ostolaza X, Garcia-Sanz M, Ayesa E (2000) Real-time control strategies for predenitrification—nitrification activated sludge plants biodegradation control. Water Sci Technol 45(4–5):453–460
Takács I, Patry GG, Nolasco D (1991) A dynamic model of the clarification thickening process. Water Res 25(10):1263–1271
Thornton A, Sunner N, Haeck M (2010) Real time control for reduced aeration and chemical consumption: a full scale study. Water Sci Technol 61(9):2169–2175
Vrečko D, Hvala N, Carlsson B (2003) Feedforward-feedback control of an activated sludge process—a simulation study. Water Sci Technol 47(12):19–26
Vrečko D, Hvala N, Gerkšič S (2004) Multivariable predictive control of an activated sludge process with nitrogen removal. In: Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on computer applications in biotechnology, Nancy, France
Vrečko D, Hvala N, Stare A, Burica O, Stražar M, Levstek M, Cerar P, Podbevšek S (2006) Improvement of ammonia removal in activated sludge process with feedforward-feedback aeration controllers. Water Sci Technol 53(4–5):125–132
Vrečko D, Hvala N, Stražar M (2011) The application of model predictive control of ammonia nitrogen in an activated sludge process. Water Sci Technol 64(5):1115–1121
Acknowledgements
The financial support of the Ministry of Education, Science, and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovenian Research Agency and European Commission (SMAC project, contract EVK1-CT-2000-00056) are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vrečko, D., Hvala, N. (2013). Model-Based Control of the Ammonia Nitrogen Removal Process in a Wastewater Treatment Plant. In: Strmčnik, S., Juričić, Đ. (eds) Case Studies in Control. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5176-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5176-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5175-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5176-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)