Skip to main content

Inclusive User Modeling and Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Multimodal End-2-End Approach to Accessible Computing

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

This chapter presents a concept of user modeling including users with different range of abilities. The chapter starts with a brief summary of existing approaches of user modeling and points out the uniqueness of our work. The user model is implemented through a simulator and a set of web services. The simulator is intended to be used as a tool for improving interface designs while the web services provide runtime adaptation. We have presented brief detail of both the simulator and the web service, their applications and conclude by discussing implications and limitations of user modeling. Later, Chap. 10 presents a concept of extending the idea of user modeling across different types of projects and standardizing it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angst, F., et al. (2010). Prediction of grip and key pinch strength in 978 healthy subjects. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11, 94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benyon, D., & Murray, D. (1993, August). Applying user modeling to human computer interaction design. Artificial Intelligence Review, 7(3–4), 199–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biswas, P., & Langdon, P. (2011, September). Investigating the gravity well algorithm to help in pointing in electronic interfaces by motor-impaired users. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5(3), 112–122. ISSN: 1754-9450.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biswas, P., & Robinson, P. (2008). Automatic evaluation of assistive interfaces. In ACM international conference on intelligent user interfaces (IUI) (pp. 247–256).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biswas, P., & Robinson, P. (2009). Modeling perception using image processing algorithms. In 23rd British computer society conference on human-computer interaction (HCI 09).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biswas, P., & Langdon, P. (2012). Developing multimodal adaptation algorithm for mobility impaired users by evaluating their hand strength. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(9). Taylor & Francis, Print ISSN: 1044-7318.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biswas, P., Langdon, P., & Robinson, P. (2012). Designing inclusive interfaces through user modeling and simulation. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 28(1). Taylor & Francis, Print ISSN: 1044-7318.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boden, M. A. (1985). Computer models of mind: Computational approaches in theoretical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buxton, W. (2009). Human input to computer systems: Theories, techniques and technology. http://www.billbuxton.com/inputManuscript.html. Accessed 27 Oct 2009

  11. Card, S., Moran, T., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duffy, V. G. (2008). Handbook of digital human modeling: Research for applied ergonomics and human factors engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. EU VUMS Cluster. (2012). VUMS White Paper. http://www.veritas-project.eu/vums/?page_id=56. Accessed 12 Dec 2012

  14. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. John, B. E. (2010). Reducing the variability between novice modelers: Results of a tool for human performance modeling produced through human-centered design. In Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (BRIMS).

    Google Scholar 

  17. John, B. E., & Kieras, D. (1996). The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: Comparison and contrast. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 3, 320–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Keates, S., Clarkson, J., & Robinson, P. (2000). Investigating the applicability of user models for motion impaired users. In ACM/SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility 2000 (pp. 129–136).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mankoff, J., Fait, H., & Juang, R. (2005). Evaluating accessibility through simulating the experiences of users with vision or motor impairments. IBM Sytems Journal, 44(3), 505–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marr, D. C. (1980). Visual information processing: The structure and creation of visual representations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 290(1038), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McCulloch, W., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 7, 115–133.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Mcmillan, W. W. (1992). Computing for users with special needs and models of computer-human interaction. In ACM/SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 1992 (pp. 143–148).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nejime, Y., & Moore, B. C. J. (1997). Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 603–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rieman, J., & Young, R. M. (1996). A dual-space model of iteratively deepening exploratory learning. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 44, 743–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Serna, A., Pigot, H., & Rialle, V. (2007). Modeling the progression of Alzheimer’s disease for cognitive assistance in smart homes. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 17, 415–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stephanidis, C., Paramythis, A., Sfyrakis, M., Stergiou, A., Maou, N., Leventis, A., Paparoulis G., & Karagiannidis, C. (1998). Adaptable and adaptive user interfaces for disabled users in the AVANTweProject. In Intelligence in services and networks, LNCS-1430 (pp. 153–166). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradipta Biswas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Biswas, P., Langdon, P. (2013). Inclusive User Modeling and Simulation. In: Biswas, P., Duarte, C., Langdon, P., Almeida, L., Jung, C. (eds) A Multimodal End-2-End Approach to Accessible Computing. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5082-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5082-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5081-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5082-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics