Skip to main content

Hybrid Copper–Chlorine Cycle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hydrogen Production from Nuclear Energy

Abstract

In this chapter, the hybrid copper–chlorine (Cu–Cl) cycle for hydrogen production is examined in detail. The historical perspective of this cycle development is presented in Sect. 6.1. A precursor of the cycle was proposed in 1974, which uses a non-electrochemical, non-thermochemical disproportionation of cuprous chloride; this process is based on complexation and chelating schemes that generate the desired products. Electrochemical hydrogen generation from hydrochloric acid and cuprous chloride electrolysis is one of the latest cycle developments for engineering scale-up. This process simplifies the separation steps and it has been proven by test-bench experiments. Two reactors were mainly studied for the hydrolysis reaction, which is a crucial cycle step: fluidized bed and spray reactor. Both are interesting schemes proposed for scaling up the cycle. At the University of Ontario Institute of Technology, a scaled up laboratory facility has been developed for each cycle step.

In total, seven cycle variants are examined in this chapter. The variants, including a copper electrowinning step, were studied mostly since 2003; much progress has been made in the development of the processes. Because electrowinning implies difficult separation of chemicals, it appears less feasible for large-scale implementation.

This chapter presents a detailed treatment of all relevant processes, such as electrochemical disproportionation, electrochemical chlorination, complexation, dehydration, drying, crystallization, hydrolysis, fluidized bed hydrodynamics and heat transfer, spray drying hydrodynamics and heat transfer, multiphase processes in reactors, thermochemical chlorination, thermolysis, heat recovery from molten salt, and special heat exchangers, as well as system integration of the unit operations.

Integration of the chemical plant with heat pumps and heat engines may have promising potential to substantially increase the overall hydrogen production efficiency. An interesting option is to use integrated heat pumps based on thermochemical processes such as a steam–methane reaction, or vapor compression heat pumps with CuCl as a working fluid.

Material research is also important for cycle development. Several corrosion-resistant coatings were developed—as explained in the chapter—and assessed experimentally by various methods. Various auxiliary systems are required for a full-scale plant. One item of major interest is separation of hydrochloric acid from an HCl/steam mixture exiting the hydrolysis reactor for purposes of recycling; this aspect is also detailed in a section of this chapter. Various concepts for a full-size plant and its equipment are presented, as well as simulation results with ASPEN Plus software. Other aspects are also discussed such as reliability, control, safety, environmental impact, and life cycle assessment. The overview in this chapter concludes that the Cu–Cl cycle is a promising candidate for large-scale hydrogen production with nuclear reactors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abanades S, Charvin P, Flamant G, Neveu P (2006) Screening of water-splitting thermo-chemical cycles potentially attractive for hydrogen production by concentrated solar energy. Energy 31:2469–2486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Dabbagh AW, Lu L (2010a) Design and reliability assessment of control systems for a nuclear-based hydrogen production plant with copper–chlorine thermochemical cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:966–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Dabbagh AW, Lu L (2010b) Dynamic flowgraph modeling of process and control systems of a nuclear-based hydrogen production plant. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:9569–9580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avsec J, Naterer GF, Predin A (2009) Calculation of thermodynamic properties for hydrochloric and copper compounds in a hydrogen production process. J Energy Technol 2:47–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Balashov VN, Schatz RS, Chalkova E, Akinfiev NN, Fedkin MV, Lvov SN (2011) CuCl electrolysis for hydrogen production in Cu-Cl thermochemical cycle. J Electrochem Soc 158:B266–B275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carty RH, Mazumder MM, Schreiber JD, Pangborn JB (1981) Thermochemical production of hydrogen. Final report 30517, vol. 1–4. Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary V, Bowen P, Witlox H (2007) Flashing liquid jets and two-phase droplet dispersion I. Experiments for derivation of droplet atomization correlations. J Hazard Mater 142:786–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croizé L, Doizi D, Larousse B, Pailloux A, Reaux D, Gallou C, Dauvois V, Roujou JL, Zanella Y, Carles P (2010) Interest of absorption spectroscopy for the control of industrial processes. Application to H2 massive production. Appl Phys B 100:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daggupati V, Naterer GF, Gabriel K, Gravelsins R, Wang Z (2009) Equilibrium conversion in Cu-Cl cycle multiphase processes of hydrogen production. Thermochem Acta 496:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daggupati V, Naterer GF, Gabriel K (2010a) Diffusion of gaseous products through a particle surface layer in a fluidized bed reactor. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:2449–2458

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Daggupati VN, Naterer GF, Gabriel KS, Gravelsins RJ, Wang ZL (2010b) Solid particle decomposition and hydrolysis reaction kinetics in Cu-Cl thermochemical hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:4877–4882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daggupati VN, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2011a) Convective heat transfer and solid conversion of reacting particles in a copper(II) chloride fluidized bed. Chem Eng Sci 66:460–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daggupati VN, Pope K, Naterer GF, Gabriel KS, Wang ZL (2011b) Conversion of solid cupric chloride in a fluidized bed hydrolysis reactor. Proceedings of international conference of hydrogen production ICH2P-11, Thessaloniki, Greece, 19–22 June, paper #112

    Google Scholar 

  • Daggupati VN, Naterer GF, Gabriel KS, Gravelsins RJ, Wang ZL (2011c) Effects of atomization conditions and flow rates on spray drying for cupric chloride particle formation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:11353–11359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dokyia M, Kotera Y (1976) Hybrid cycle with electrolysis using Cu-Cl system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1:117–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrandon MS, Lewis MA, Tatterson DF, Nankanic RV, Kumarc M, Wedgewood LE, Nitsche LC (2008) The hybrid Cu-Cl thermochemical cycle. I. Conceptual process design and H2A cost analysis. II. Limiting the formation of CuCl during hydrolysis. In: NHA annual hydrogen conference, Sacramento convention center, CA, 30 March to 3 April

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrandon MS, Lewis MA, Tatterson DF, Gross A, Doizi D, Croizé L, Dauvois V, Roujou JL, Zanella Y, Carles P (2010a) Hydrogen production by the Cu-Cl thermochemical cycle: Investigation of the key step of hydrolysing CuCl2 to Cu2OCl2 and HCl using a spray reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:992–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrandon MS, Lewis MA, Alvarez F, Shafirovich E (2010b) Hydrolysis of CuCl2 in the Cu-Cl thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production: experimental studies using a spray reactor with an ultrasonic atomizer. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:1895–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghandehariun S, Rosen MA, Naterer GF, Wang Z (2011) Comparison of molten salt heat recovery options in the Cu-Cl cycle of hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:11328–11337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovskii M, Dincer I, Rosen MA, Pioro I (2008) Performance assessment of a combined system to link a supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactor and a thermochemical water splitting cycle for hydrogen production. Energy Conv Manage 49:1873–1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haseli Y, Dincer I, Naterer GF (2008) Hydrodynamic gas-solid model of cupric chloride particles reacting with superheated steam for thermochemical hydrogen production. Chem Eng Sci 63:4596–4604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haseli Y, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2009) Fluid-particle mass transport of cupric chloride hydrolysis in a fluidized bed. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:2507–2515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes WM (2012) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 92 (Internet Version)th edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda BM, Kaye MH (2008) Thermodynamic properties in the Cu-Cl-O-H system. Seventh international conference on nuclear and radiochemistry, Budapest, Hungary, August

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaber O, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2010a) Convective heat transfer from solidified molten salt in a direct contact heat exchanger. Heat Mass Transf 46:999–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaber O, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2010b) Heat recovery from molten CuCl in the Cu-Cl cycle of hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:6140–6151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Chen Y (2005) Preliminary process analysis and simulation of the copper-chlorine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen generation. Nuclear hydrogen production, third information exchange meeting, Oarai, Japan, 5–7 October. Nuclear Energy Agency 6122

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Serban M, Basco J (2003) Hydrogen production at 550 °C using a low temperature thermochemical cycle. Proceedings of the OECD/NEA meeting, Argonne National Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Serban M, Basco JK (2004) A progress report on the chemistry of the low temperature Cu-Cl thermochemical cycle, Trans Am Nucl Soc 91:113–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Petri MC, Masin JG. (2005a) A scoping flowsheet methodology for evaluating alternative thermochemical cycles. Nuclear hydrogen production, third information exchange meeting, Oarai, Japan, 5–7 October. Nuclear Energy Agency 6122

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Masin JG, Vilim RB, Serban M (2005b) Development of the low temperature thermochemical cycle. International congress on advances in nuclear power plants, 15–19 May, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Masin JG (2009) The evaluation of alternative thermochemical cycles—Part II: the down-selection process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:4125–4135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Masin JG, O’Hare PA (2009a) Evaluation of alternative thermochemical cycles, Part I: the methodology. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:4115–4124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Ferrandon MS, Tatterson DF, Mathias P (2009b) Evaluation of alternative thermochemical cycles—Part III further development of the Cu-Cl cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:4136–4145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin GD, Wang Z, Naterer GF, Gabriel K (2010) Chemically reacting and particle-laden multiphase flow in a molten salt vessel. Tenth AIAA/ASME joint thermophysics and heat transfer conference, Chicago, Illinois, 28 June to 1 July, Paper #225388

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin GD, Wang Z, Naterer GF, Gabriel K (2011a) X-ray diffraction study of multiphase reverse reaction with molten CuCl and oxygen. Thermochim Acta 524:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin GD, Wang Z, Naterer GF, Gabriel K (2011b) Byproducts and reaction pathways for integration of the CueCl cycle of hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:13414–13424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuillan BW, Brown LC, Besenbruch GE, Tolman R, Cramer T, Russ BE, Vermillion BA, Earl B., Hsieh H-T, Chen Y, Kwan K, Diver R, Siegal N, Weimer A, Perkins C, Lewandowski A (2010) High efficiency generation of hydrogen fuels using solar thermal-chemical splitting of water. General Atomics Project 3022

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller AI (2005) An update on Canadian activities on hydrogen. Nuclear hydrogen production, 3rd Information Exchange Meeting, Oarai, Japan, 5–7 October. Nuclear Energy Agency 6122

    Google Scholar 

  • Naterer GF (2008) Second law viability of upgrading waste heat for thermochemical hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:6037–6045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naterer GF, Gabriel K, Wang Z, Daggupati V, Gravelsins R (2008a) Thermochemical hydrogen production with a copper-chlorine cycle, I: oxygen release from copper oxychloride decomposition. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:5439–5450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naterer GF, Daggupati VN, Marin G, Gabriel KS, Wang ZL (2008b) Thermochemical hydrogen production with a copper–chlorine cycle, II: flashing and drying of aqueous cupric chloride. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:5451–5459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naterer GF, Suppiah S, Lewis M, Gabriel K, Dincer I, Rosen MA, Fowler M, Rizvi G, Easton EB, Ikeda BM, Kaye MH, Lu L, Pioro I, Spekkens P, Tremaine P, Mostaghimi J, Avsec A, Jiang J (2009) Recent Canadian advances in nuclear-based hydrogen production and the thermochemical Cu-Cl cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:2901–2917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naterer GF, Suppiah S, Stolberg L, Lewis M, Wang Z, Daggupati V, Gabriel K, Dincer I, Rosen MA, Spekkens P, Lvov L, Fowler M, Tremaine P, Mostaghimi J, Easton EB, Trevani L, Rizvi G, Ikeda BM, Kaye MH, Lu L, Pioro I, Smith WR, Secnik E, Jiang J, Avsec J (2010) Canada’s program on nuclear hydrogen production and the thermochemical Cu-Cl cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:10905–10926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naterer GF, Suppiah S, Stolberg L, Lewis M, Ferrandon M, Wang Z, Dincer I, Gabriel K, Rosen MA, Secnik E, Easton EB, Trevani L, Pioro I, Tremaine P, Lvov S, Jiang J, Rizvi G, Ikeda BM, Luf L, Kaye M, Smith WR, Mostaghimi J, Spekkens P, Fowler M, Avsec J (2011a) Clean hydrogen production with the Cu-Cl cycle—progress of international consortium, I: experimental unit operations. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:15472–15485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naterer GF, Suppiah S, Stolberg L, Lewis M, Ferrandon M, Wang Z, Dincer I, Gabriel K, Rosen MA, Secnik E, Easton EB, Trevani L, Pioro I, Tremaine P, Lvov S, Jiang J, Rizvi G, Ikeda BM, Luf L, Kaye M, Smith WR, Mostaghimi J, Spekkens P, Fowler M, Avsec J (2011b) Clean hydrogen production with the Cu-Cl cycle—progress of international consortium, II: simulations, thermochemical data and materials. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:15486–15501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIST (2012) Chemistry webbook. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available from: http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/

  • Nixon A, Ferrandon M, Kaye MH, Trevani L (2011) Thermochemical hydrogen production Synthesis, characterization, and decomposition of copper oxychloride. J Thermal Anal Calor. doi:10.1007/s10973-011-1998-3

  • Odukoya A, Naterer GF (2011) Electrochemical mass transfer irreversibility of cuprous chloride electrolysis for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:11345–11352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhan MF (2011) Conceptual design, analysis and optimization of nuclear-based hydrogen production via copper-chloride thermochemical cycles. PhD thesis, University of Ontario Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Orhan MF, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2008a) Thermodynamic analysis of the copper production step in a copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen production. Thermochim Acta 480:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhan MF, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2008b) Energy and exergy assessments of the hydrogen production step of a copper-chlorine thermochemical water splitting cycle driven by nuclear-based heat. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:6456–6466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhan MF, Dincer I, Naterer GF (2008c) Cost analysis of a thermochemical Cu–Cl pilot plant for nuclear-based hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:6006–6020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhan MF, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2009) Energy and exergy analyses of the fluidized bed of a copper-chlorine cycle for nuclear-based hydrogen production via thermochemical water decomposition. Chem Eng Res Des 87:684–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhan MF, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2010a) An exergy-cost-energy-mass analysis of a hybrid copper-chlorine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:4831–4838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhan MF, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2010b) Exergoeconomic analysis of a thermochemical copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen production using specific exergy cost (SPECO) method. Thermochim Acta 497:60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhan MF, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2011) Exergy analysis of heat exchangers in the copper-chlorine thermochemical cycle to enhance thermal effectiveness and cycle efficiency. Int J Low-Carbon Technol 6:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbilen A (2011) Life cycle assessment of nuclear-based hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using a copper-chlorine (Cu-Cl) cycle. MSc thesis, University of Ontario Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozbilen A, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2011a) Environmental evaluation of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using the Cu-Cl Cycle: a parametric study. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:9514–9528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbilen A, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2011b) A comparative life cycle analysis of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using a Cu-Cl cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:11321–11327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry T (2008) Thermodynamics and magnetism of copper oxychloride. MSc thesis, Bringham Young University, Provo, UT, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret R, Chen Y, Besenbruch G, Diver R, Weimer A, Lewandowski A, Miller E (200). High temperature thermochemical solar hydrogen generation research. UNLV Research Foundation. Report to Department of Energy DE-FG36-03GO13062

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope K, Naterer GF, Wang Z (2011) Pressure drop of packed bed vertical flow for multiphase hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:11338–11344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganathan S, Easton EB (2010a) High performance ceramic carbon electrode-based anodes for use in the Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:1001–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganathan S, Easton EB (2010b) Ceramic carbon electrode-based anodes for use in the Cu-Cl thermochemical cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:4871–4876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MA, Naterer GF, Chukwu CC, Sadhankar R, Suppiah S (2010) Nuclear-based hydrogen production with a thermochemical copper-chlorine cycle and supercritical water reactor: equipment scale-up and process simulation. Int J Energy Res. doi:10.1002/er.1702

  • Serban M, Lewis MA, Basco JK (2004) Kinetic study of the hydrogen and oxygen production reactions in the copper-chloride thermochemical cycle. AIChE SPRING NATIONAL MEETING, New Orleans LA, 25–29 April

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim K-S, Son Y-M, Kim J-W (1993) Some thermochemical cycles composed of copper compounds with three-step reactions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 18:287–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg L, Boniface HA, McMahon S, Suppiah S, York S (2008) Electrolysis of the CuCl/HCl aqueous system for the production of nuclear hydrogen. Proceedings of the fourth international topical meeting on high temperature reactor technology HTR-2008. 28 September to 1 October, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppiah S, Li J, Sadhankar R, Kutchcoskie KJ, Lewis M (2005) Study of the hybrid Cu-Cl cycle for nuclear hydrogen production. Nuclear hydrogen production, third information exchange meeting, Oarai, Japan, 5–7 October. Nuclear Energy Agency 6122

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppiah S, Stolberg L, Boniface H, Tan G, McMahon S, York S, Zhang W (2009) Canadian nuclear hydrogen R&D programme: Development of the medium-temperature Cu-Cl cycle and contributions to the high-temperature sulphur-iodine cycle. Forth international exchange meeting on nuclear hydrogen production, Oakbrook IL, USA, 13–16 April. Nuclear Energy Agency and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, NEA 6805

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevani L, Ehlerova J, Sedlbauer J, Tremaine PR (2010) Complexation in the Cu(II)–LiCl–H2O system at temperatures to 423 K by UV-visible spectroscopy. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:4893–4900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevani L (2011) The copper-chloride cycle: synthesis and characterization of copper oxychloride. Hydrogen and fuel cells international conference and exhibition, Vancouver, BC, 15–18 May

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilim RB (2004) Commodity inventories and equipment sizes for a low temperature nuclear-chemical plant for production of hydrogen. AIChE spring national meeting, conference proceedings. pp 2706–2712

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Naterer GF, Gabriel K (2008) Multiphase reactor scale-up for Cu–Cl thermochemical hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:6934–6946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZL, Naterer GF, Gabriel K, Gravelsins R, Daggupati V (2009) Comparison of different copper-chlorine thermochemical cycles for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:3267–3276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentorf RH, Hanneman RE (1974) Thermochemical hydrogen generation. Science 185:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams LO (1980) Hydrogen power. An introduction to hydrogen energy and its applications. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamfirescu C, Dincer I, Naterer GF (2009) Performance evaluation of organic and titanium based working fluids for high-temperature heat pumps. Thermochim Acta 496:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamfirescu C, Dincer I, Naterer GF (2010a) Thermophysical properties of copper compounds in copper-chlorine thermochemical water splitting cycles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:4839–4852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamfirescu C, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2010b) Kinetics study of the copper/hydrochloric acid reaction for thermochemical hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:4853–4860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamfirescu C, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2010c) Upgrading of waste heat for combined power and hydrogen production with nuclear reactors. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 132:102911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamfirescu C, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2011) Vapor compression CuCl heat pump integrated with a thermochemical water splitting cycle. Thermochim Acta 512:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamfirescu C, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2012) Photochemical disproportionation of cuprous chloride for electrolytic hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.183

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Nomenclature

Nomenclature

a :

Charge transfer coefficient

a :

Fluidized bed parameter

a, b :

Regression coefficients

A :

Area (m2)

B :

Spalding number

Bi :

Biot number

c p :

Specific heat (kJ/kg K)

C :

Molar concentration (mol/dm3)

C d :

Drag coefficient

C P :

Molar specific heat at constant pressure (kJ/mol K)

COP:

Coefficient of performance

d :

Diameter (m)

d p :

Sauter mean diameter (m)

D :

Diffusion coefficient (m2/s)

D as :

Damkohler number at reactor scale

E :

Molar specific energy (kJ/mol)

\( E \) :

Electric potential (V)

f :

Fugacity (Pa)

f p :

Friction factor of the bed

F :

Faraday constant (C/mol)

g :

Gravitational acceleration (m/s2)

G :

Molar Gibbs free energy (kJ/mol)

GHSV:

gas hourly space velocity (h-1)

j :

Current density (A/m2)

k :

Thermal conductivity (W/m K)

k :

Reaction rate constants

K :

Equilibrium constant

\( \mathcal{K} \) :

Interchange coefficient

h :

Heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

h :

Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)

H :

Molar enthalpy (kJ/mol)

HR:

Hausner ratio

L :

Fluidized bed height (m)

m :

Mass (kg)

\( \dot{m} \) :

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

M :

Molecular mass (kg/kmol)

n :

Order of reaction

\( \dot{n} \) :

Moles generation rate (mol/s)

\( {n_{\mathrm{ d}}} \) :

Electro-osmotic drag coefficient

N :

Number of atoms

NTU:

Number of thermal units

OVP:

Total over-potential (V)

P :

Pressure (Pa)

Pr :

Prandtl number

q :

Heat flux (W/m2)

Q :

Heat (kJ)

\( \dot{Q} \) :

Heat transfer rate (W)

r :

Superficial specific resistance (Ω/m2)

r :

Reaction rate (mol/s)

\( \boldsymbol{\mathfrak{ r}} \) :

Radial coordinate (m)

R :

Universal gas constant (kJ/mol K)

ROCV:

Reversible open-cell voltage (V)

Re :

Reynolds number

S :

Molar entropy (kJ/mol K)

Sc :

Schmidt number

Sh :

Sherwood number

SP:

Span

t :

Time (s)

T :

Temperature (K)

U :

Overall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

\( v \) :

Molar specific volume (m3/mol)

V :

Voltage (V)

\( \mathcal{V} \) :

Velocity (m/s)

W :

Work (kJ)

W b :

Bed inventory (kg)

x :

Transversal coordinate (m)

x :

Conversion of solid particles

x s :

Molar steam fraction

X :

Conversion factor

y :

Mole fraction

Y :

Mass fraction of solid

6.1.1 Greek Letters

\( \alpha \) :

Volumetric thermal expansion coefficient (1/K)

\( \delta \) :

Thickness (m)

\( \varepsilon \) :

Bubble fraction in the bed

\( \varepsilon \) :

Heat exchanger effectiveness

\( \eta \) :

Efficiency

\( \varphi \) :

Carnot abatement factor

\( \Phi \) :

Sphericity

\( \mu \) :

Dynamic viscosity (Pa s)

\( \psi \) :

Exergy efficiency

\( \theta \) :

Dimensionless temperature

\( \rho \) :

Density (kg/m3)

\( \xi \) :

Extent of reaction

\( \sigma \) :

Electric conductivity (S/m)

\( \tau \) :

Reaction time (s)

\( \omega \) :

Acentric factor

6.1.2 Subscripts

0:

Exchange current

a:

Anode

act:

Activation

b:

Bulk phase

b:

Backward

c:

Critical

c:

Cathode

c:

Cold

conc:

Concentration

d:

Decomposition

d:

Droplet

D:

Debye

e:

Electrolyte

e:

Effective

eq:

Equilibrium

E:

Einstein

f:

Fluidized

f:

Forward

g:

Vapor

gen:

Generated

h:

Hot

i:

General index

l:

Liquid

L:

Limiting current density

lg:

Latent

m:

Melting

ohm:

Ohmic

p:

Particle

r:

Reduced

r:

Reaction

sat:

Saturation

t:

Tube

w:

Water

6.1.3 Superscripts

0:

Reference state

″:

Per unit of surface

¯:

Average value (overbar)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naterer, G.F., Dincer, I., Zamfirescu, C. (2013). Hybrid Copper–Chlorine Cycle. In: Hydrogen Production from Nuclear Energy., vol 8. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4938-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4938-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4937-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4938-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics