Skip to main content

Thermochemical Water-Splitting Cycles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hydrogen Production from Nuclear Energy

Abstract

This chapter presents and analyzes thermochemical cycles, which are promising methods of nuclear produced hydrogen at a large scale. The introduction presents the origins of concepts and a historical perspective on the technology development. In the first part, the most important aspects and fundamental concepts for cycle modeling and synthesis are introduced and detailed. The discussion proceeds from single-step thermochemical water-splitting processes, to two-step and multi-step processes, followed by a presentation of hybrid cycles. Relevant analysis methods are introduced in the context of each type of cycle presentation. These concepts include chemical equilibrium, chemical kinetics, reaction rate and yield, and others. Analysis of the practicality of chemical reactions is established based on their yield. A large number of reactions and thermochemical cycles are compiled, categorized, and discussed. In total, the chapter presents 122 thermochemical cycles, 25 hybrid cycles, and six special cycles (assisted with photonic or nuclear radiation).

The most important reactions, encountered in pure and hybrid cycles, are analyzed in detail. For example, both the Deacon reaction and H2SO4 decomposition methods are the most encountered oxygen-evolving reactions. Hydrogen iodide decomposition has a major role as a hydrogen-evolving reaction. The Bunsen reaction is also significant. In thermochemical cycle synthesis and assessment, it is important to account for the energy associated with chemical separation, chemical recycling, and material transport; this is explained and exemplified in the chapter. Another discussion involves cycle synthesis and a down selection process, a methodology that systematically leads to identification of the most promising cycles. A comparative assessment of cycles is presented and the use of exergy as a potential analysis tool is introduced. The final part of the chapter refers to three thermochemical plants which are considered as the most promising. These are plants based on the sulfur–iodine cycle, the hybrid sulfur cycle, and the hybrid copper–chlorine cycle. Some bench-scale or pilot plants exist for the sulfur–iodine and hybrid sulfur plants and they are in the course of development for the copper–chlorine cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abanades S, Charvin P, Flamant G, Neveu P (2006) Screening of water-splitting thermo-chemical cycles potentially attractive for hydrogen production by concentrated solar energy. Energy 31:2469–2486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andress RJ, Martin LL (2010) On the synthesis of hydrogen production alternative thermochemical cycles with electrochemical steps. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:958–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balta MT, Dincer I, Hepbasli A (2010) Potential methods for geothermal-based hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:4949–4961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger CE (1978) Hydrogen production from water by thermochemical cycles; a 1977 update. Cryogenics 18:170–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghi GE (1986) A decade of research on thermochemical hydrogen at the joint research centre, Ispra. Int J Hydrogen Energy 11:761–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgen E, Bilgen C (1982) Solar hydrogen production using two-step thermochemical cycles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 7:637–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brecher LE, Spewock S, Warde CJ (1977) The Westinghouse sulfur cycle for the thermochemical decomposition of water. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown LC, Besenbruch GE, Schultz KR, Showalter SK, Marshall AC, Pickard PS, Funk JF (2002) High efficiency generation of hydrogen fuels using thermochemical cycles and nuclear power. General Atomics Report GA-A24326

    Google Scholar 

  • Carty RH, Cogner WL (1980) A heat penalty and economic analyses of the hybrid sulfuric acid process. Int J Hydrogen Energ 5:7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carty RH, Mazumder MM, Schreider JD, Pangborn JB (1981) Thermochemical hydrogen production, vols. 1–4. Gas Research Institute, Chicago, IL, Report GRI-80/0023

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao RE (1974) Thermochemical water decomposition process. Industrial Eng Chem, Process Res Develop 13:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chikazawa Y, Nakagiri T, Konomura M (2006) A system design study of fast breeder reactor hydrogen production plant using thermochemical and electrolytic hybrid process. Nuclear Technol 155:340–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Dincer I, Balta MT (2011) Potential thermochemical and hybrid cycles for nuclear-based hydrogen production. Int J Energy Res 35:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dincer I, Zamfirescu C (2011) Sustainable energy systems and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokyia M, Kotera Y (1976) Hybrid cycle with electrolysis using Cu-Cl system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1:117–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dokyia M, Fukuda K, Kameyama T, Kotera Y, Asakura S (1977) The study of thermochemical hydrogen preparation. (II) Electrochemical hybrid cycle using sulphur-iodine system. Denki Kagaku (Electrochemistry, Jpn) 45:139–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokyia M, Kameyama T, Fukuda K (1979) Thermochemical hydrogen preparation—Part V. A feasibility study of the sulphur iodine cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 4:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Vilage (2012) http://www.engineeringvillage2.org. Accessed in March 2012

  • Ewan BCR, Allen RWK (2005) Assessing the Efficiency Limits for Hydrogen Production by Thermochemical Cycles. AIChE annual meeting, Cincinnati 30 October–4 November 2005, Paper 210c

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishtik I, Datta R (2008) Systematic generation of thermochemical cycles for water splitting. Comput Chem Eng 32:1625–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk JE (2001) Thermochemical hydrogen production: past and present. Int J Hydrogen Energy 26:158–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk JE, Reinstrom RM (1964) Final report energy depot electrolysis systems study. TID 20441 (EDR 3714), Vol. 2, Suppl. A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk JE, Reinstrom RM (1966) Energy requirement in the production of hydrogen from water. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Develop 5:336–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorensek MG, Summers WA (2009) Hybrid sulfur flowsheets using PEM electrolysis and a bayonet decomposition reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:4097–4114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes PG (1966) Energy depot fuel production and utilization. SAE Transactions 74:65001

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamita N, Ohta T, Asano N (1984) Hybridized hydrogen production system with Fe-I photochemical reaction in concentrated phosphoric acid. Int J Hydrogen Energy 9:563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasahara S, Kubo S, Hino R, Onuki K, Nomura M, Nakao S (2007) Flow-sheet study of the thermochemical water splitting iodine-sulfur process for effective hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32:489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein SA (2011) Engineering equation solver. http://www.fchart.com/assets/downloads/ees_manual.pdf. Accessed in March 2012

  • Knoche KF, Cremer H, Breywisch D, Hegels S, Steinborn G, Wüster G (1978) Experimental and theoretical investigation of thermochemical hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 3:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lede J, Lapicque F, Villermaux J, Gales B, Ounalli A, Baumard JF, Anthony AM (1982) Production of hydrogen by direct thermal decomposition of water: preliminary investigations. Int J Hydrogen Energy 7:939–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Masin JG, O’HAre PA (2009) Evaluation of alternative themochemical cycles, Part I: the methodology. Int J Hydrogen Energ 34:4115–4124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Masin JG (2009) The evaluation of alternative thermochemical cycles – Part II: The down-selection process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:4125–4135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu PWT, Garcia ER, Ammon RL (1981) Recent developments in the technology of sulfur dioxide depolarized electrolysis. J Appl Electrochem 11:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin GD, Wang Z, Naterer GF, Gabriel K (2011) Byproducts and reaction pathways for integration of the CueCl cycle of hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:13414–13424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuillan BW, Brown LC, Besenbruch GE, Tolman R, Cramer T, Russ BE, Vermillion BA, Earl B, Hsieh H-T, Chen Y, Kwan K, Diver R, Siegal N, Weimer A, Perkins C, Lewandowski A (2010) High efficiency generation of hydrogen fuels using solar thermal-chemical splitting of water. General Atomics Project 3022

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura T (1977) Hydrogen production from water utilising solar heat at high temperatures. Solar Energy 19:467–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naterer GF, Suppiah S, Stolberg L, Lewis M, Ferrandon M, Wang Z, Dincer I, Gabriel K, Rosen MA, Secnik E, Easton EB, Trevani L, Pioro I, Tremaine P, Lvov S, Jiang J, Rizvi G, Ikeda BM, Luf L, Kaye M, Smith WR, Mostaghimi J, Spekkens P, Fowler M, Avsec J (2011a) Clean hydrogen production with the Cu-Cl cycle – Progress of international consortium, I: Experimental unit operations. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:15472–15485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naterer GF, Suppiah S, Stolberg L, Lewis M, Ferrandon M, Wang Z, Dincer I, Gabriel K, Rosen MA, Secnik E, Easton EB, Trevani L, Pioro I, Tremaine P, Lvov S, Jiang J, Rizvi G, Ikeda BM, Luf L, Kaye M, Smith WR, Mostaghimi J, Spekkens P, Fowler M, Avsec J (2011b) Clean hydrogen production with the Cu-Cl cycle – Progress of international consortium, II: Simulations, thermochemical data and materials. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:15486–15501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomura M, Nakao S, Okuda H, Fujiwara S, Kasahara S, Ikenoya K, Kubo S, Onuki K (2004) Development of an electrochemical cell for efficient hydrogen production through the IS process. AIChE J 50:1991–1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta T, Asakura S, Yamaguchi M, Kamiya N, Gotoh H, Otagawa T (1976) Photochemical and thermoelectric utilisation of solar energy in a hybrid water splitting system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1:113–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perret R (2011) Solar thermochemical hydrogen production. Thermochemical cycle selection and investment priority. Sandia National Laboratory, Report 3622

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MA (2008) Exergy analysis of hydrogen production by thermochemical water decomposition using the Ispra Mark-10 Cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:6921–6933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MA (2010) Advances in hydrogen production by thermochemical water decomposition: A review. Energy 35:1068–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MA, Scott DS (1992) Exergy analysis of hydrogen production from heat and water by electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 17:199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai M, Bilgen E, Tsutsumi A, Yoshida K (1996) Adiabatic UT-3 thermochemical process for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 21:865–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato S (1979) Thermochemical hydrogen production. In: Otha T (ed) Solar-hydrogen energy systems. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage RL, Blank L, Cady T, Cox K, Murray R, Dee Williams R (1973) A hydrogen energy carrier. Systems Design Institute, NASA Grant NGT 44-005-114

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivasubramanian P, Ramasamy RP, Freire FJ, Holland CE, Weidner JW (2007) Electrochemical hydrogen production from thermochemical cycles using a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer. Int J Hydrogen Energ 32:463–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verfonden K (2007) Nuclear energy for hydrogen production. Writings of Research Center Jülich, Energy Technology, Volume 58, Research Center Jülich GmbH: Jülich(Germany). http://juwel.fz-juelich.de:8080/dspace/bitstream/2128/2518/1/Energietechnik_58.pdf. Accessed in March 2012

  • Von Federsdorff CG (1974) Non-fossil fuel process for production of hydrogen and oxygen. US Patent 3,802,993

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LO (1980) Hydrogen power. An Introduction to hydrogen energy and its applications. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZL, Naterer GF, Gabriel KS, Gravelsins R, Daggupati V (2010) Comparison of sulfur-iodine and copper-chlorine thermochemical hydrogen production cycles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:4820–4830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan XL, Hino R (2011) Nuclear hydrogen production. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamfirescu C, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2010) Novel CuCl vapor compression heat pump integrated with a thermochemical water splitting cycle. Thermochimica Acta 512:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamfirescu C, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2012) Solar light-based hydrogen production systems. In: Anwar S (eds) Encyclopedia of energy engineering and technology. Taylor Francis http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1081/E-EEE-120047413. Accessed in February 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Nomenclature

Nomenclature

\( \it{A} \) :

Pre-exponential factor

\( c \) :

Molar concentration, kmol/m3

\( \mathrm{ ex} \) :

Specific molar exergy, kJ/mol

Ex:

Exergy, kJ

\( G \) :

Molar Gibbs free energy, kJ/mol

H :

Molar enthalpy, kJ/mol

HHV:

Molar based higher heating value, kJ/mol

IP:

Improvement potential, kJ

\( \it k \) :

Rate constant, \( {{\mathrm{ s}}^{-1 }} \)

\( {K_{\mathrm{ eq}}} \) :

Equilibrium constant

m :

Mass, kg

n :

Number of moles

\( \dot{n} \) :

Molar flow rate, mol/s

\( P \) :

Pressure, Pa

\( Q \) :

Heat flux, kJ

\( \dot{Q} \) :

Heat flux, kW

r :

Recycling ratio

\( R \) :

Universal gas constant, J/mol K

\( S \) :

Molar entropy, kJ/mol K

SI:

Sustainability index

\( T \) :

Temperature, K

\( \it{v} \) :

Molar volume, m3/kmol

W :

Work, kJ

\( y \) :

Molar fraction

5.1.1 Greek Letters

\( \eta \) :

Energy efficiency

\( \mu \) :

Chemical potential, kJ/mol

\( \psi \) :

Exergy efficiency

\( \xi \) :

Extent of reaction

5.1.2 Subscripts

0:

Reference state

act:

Activation

aux:

Auxiliary

b:

Backward

d:

Destruction

el:

Electric

elchem:

Electrochemical

eq:

Equivalent

f:

Forward, formation

gen:

Generation

in:

Inlet, input

loss:

Losses

out:

Output

P:

Products

R:

Reactants

sep:

Separation

tresh:

Threshold

5.1.3 Superscripts

0:

Reference state

circ:

Circulation

ch:

Chemical

Q:

Heat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naterer, G.F., Dincer, I., Zamfirescu, C. (2013). Thermochemical Water-Splitting Cycles. In: Hydrogen Production from Nuclear Energy., vol 8. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4938-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4938-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4937-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4938-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics