Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Postmodernism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Maritime Governance and Policy-Making

  • 1711 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between Postmodernism and the governance of the maritime sector is established. This chapter examines the characteristics of the Postmodern era and how it represents a change from Modernist times when the institutions that provide the framework for maritime governance were established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aalberts, T. E. (2004). The future of sovereignty in multilevel governance Europe—A constructivist reading. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, L. (1966). Symbiotic marketing. Harvard Business Review, 44, 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrow, M. (1996). The global age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allmendinger, P. (2001). Planning in postmodern times. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amis, M. (2003). Koba the dread: Laughter and the twenty million. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1984). Modernity and revolution. New Left Review, 144, 96–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. (1996). Frontiers: Territory and state formation in the modern world. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antin, D. (1972). Modernism and postmodernism: approaching the present in American poetry. Boundary, 2(1), 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antin, D. (1980). Is There a Postmodernism? In, H.R. Garvin, (Ed.) (1980a). Romanticism, Modernism, Postmodernism, Bucknell Review, 25(2), 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrington, C. E., & Francis, J. R. (1989). Letting the chat out of the bag: Deconstruction, privilege and accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(1/2), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arts, B., Leroy, P., & van Tatenhove, J. (2006). Political modernization and policy arrangements. A framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organization Review, 6, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, R. K. (1991). The state of the discipline: Realism under challenge. In R. Higgott & J. L. Richardson (Eds.), International relations: Global and Australian perspectives on an evolving discipline. Canberra: Department of International Relations, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, R., & Walker, R. B. J. (1990). Speaking the language of exile: Dissident thought in international studies. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing, 39, 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1979). Toward a formal theory of marketing exchanges. In O. C. Ferrell, S. W. Brown, & C. W. Lamb (Eds.), Conceptual and theoretical developments in marketing (pp. 431–447). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1984). A prospectus for theory construction in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 48, 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., Heon, F., & Steingard, D. (1993). Post-modern international development: Interdevelopment and global interbeing. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 6(3), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, J. G. (1973). Crash. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e) Foreign Agents Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of postmodernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft Auf Dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization politics tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, J. (2004). Mobility and safety. Theory Culture and Society, 21(4/5), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1974). The coming of post-industrial society. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benko, G. (1997). Introduction: Modernity, postmodernity and the social sciences. In G. Benko & U. Strohmayer (Eds.), Geography, history and social science (pp. 1–48). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, L. (1993). Between modernism and postmodernism. Progress in Human Geography, 17(4), 490–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. A. (1998). The postmodern presence. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, W. H. (1993). The postmodern organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. (1982). All that’s solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertens, H. (1995). The idea of the postmodern: A history. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. (1996). Lessons from premodern and modern for postmodern management. In G. Palmer & S. Clegg (Eds.), Constituting management. Markets, meanings and identities (pp. 329–345). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M., & Dennehy, R. F. (2008). Managing in the postmodern world; America’s revolution against exploitation (2nd ed.). Dubuque: Information Age: Kendall Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M., Fitzgibbon, D. E., & Steingard, D. S. (1996a). Storytelling at administrative science quarterly: warding off the postmodern barbarians. In D. M. Boje, R. P. Gephart Jr., & T. J. Thatchenkery (Eds.), Postmodern management and organization theory (pp. 60–92). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M., Gephart, R. P., Jr., & Thatchenkery, T. J. (Eds.). (1996b). Postmodern management and organization theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriard, N. (2009). The radicant. New York: Lukas and Sternberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R., & Durand, J. (1993). After Fordism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breisach, E. (2011). On the future of history: The postmodernist challenge and its aftermath. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1997). Global, fragmented, hierarchical: Henri Lefebvre’s geographies of globalization. Public Culture, 10(1), 135–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D, 16(4), 459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1999). Beyond state-centrism? Territoriality and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 28(1), 39–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1991). Feminist hesitations, postmodern exposures. Differences: Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 3(1), 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (1994). Review of ‘the political subject of violence’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23(1), 142–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, M. (1995). On making ends meet. In M. Bull (Ed.), Apocalypse theory and the end of the world (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, B. (2000). Post-modernism and Post-Modernity, The Encyclopaedia of Informal Education, www.infed.org/biblio/b-postmd.htm.

  • Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 2: the contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2), 221–235.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C. (2002). Postmodernism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, L. K. (1975). Managing the transition to post-modern society. Public Administration Review, 35(6), 567–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (1993). Postmodernism as pseudohistory. Theory, Culture and Society, 10, 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (1985). Poststructuralism, postmodernism, postmarxism. Theory, Culture and Society, 2(3), 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (1989). Against postmodernism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1990). Global inscription: How foreign policy constitutes the United States. Alternatives, 15, 280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. A. (1981). Industrialization in the periphery: The evolving global division of labour. International Studies Quarterly, 25(3), 347–384.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. A. (1996). The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, regulatory or post-modern? Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(1), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, L. (1982). Through the looking glass. In L. Carroll (Ed.), Journeys in wonderland. Glasgow: Galley Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., & Henry, N. (1975). A symposium: Knowledge management. Public Administration Review, 35(6), 567–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P., & Jackson, N. (1987). Management, myth and metatheory—from scarcity to postscarcity. International Studies of Management and Organization, 17(3), 64–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A. (2000). Redirecting critique in postmodern organization studies: The perspective of Foucault. Organization Studies, 21(6), 1059–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (1996). Fredric Jameson’s postmodern marxism. Cogdito, 4(2), www.mun.ca/phil/codgito/vol4/v4doc2.html.

  • Clegg, S. R. (1990). Modern organizations. Organization studies in the postmodern world. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. R. (1996). Postmodern management. In G. Palmer & S. Clegg (Eds.), Constituting management. Markets, meanings and identities (pp. 235–265). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. (1997). Rethinking the youth question: Education, labour and cultural studies. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, S. (1989). Postmodernist culture. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (1989). Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 3: the contribution of Jacques Derrida. Organization Studies, 10(4), 479–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2000). The post-modern state and the world order. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 9(1), 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, M. R. (1991). Postmodernism, language and the strains of modernism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 210–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1985). Urban renaissance and the spirit of post-modernism. New Left Review, 151, 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Onis, F. (1961). Antologia de le Poesia Espanola e Hispanoamericana (1882–1932). New York: Las Américas Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa Santos, B. (1995). Globalization, nation-states and the legal field, from legal diaspora to legal ecumene? In B. de Sousa Santos (Ed.), Towards a new common sense: Law, science and politics in the paradigmatic transition (pp. 250–377). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. J. (1986). Postmodernism and planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 4, 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. J. (1988). The postmodern challenge: Reconstructing human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS 13, 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. J. (1991). Book review: The condition of postmodernity: An inquiry into the origins of cultural change, David Harvey. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. J. (1997). Postmodern bloodlines. In G. Benko & U. Strohmayer (Eds.), Geography, history and social science (pp. 49–71). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. J., & Flusty, S. (1998). Postmodern urbanism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(1), 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1986). Postmodern social theory. Sociological Theory, 4, 194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. (1990). The (s)pace of international relations: Simulation, surveillance, and speed. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena. Evanstown: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dews, P. (1995a). Logics of disintegration. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dews, P. (1995b). The limits of disenchantment: Essays on contemporary European philosophy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (1994). Global-local tensions: Firms and states in the global space-economy. Economic Geography, 70(2), 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkink, G. (1993). Postmodernism, power, synergy. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geograpfie, 84(3), 178–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1957). Landmarks of tomorrow. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1992). Managing for the future. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (1991) Inner Space, 18 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, J. M. (1977). Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, J. M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entrikin, N. (1976). Contemporary humanism in geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 66(4), 615–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1968). The active society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, M. (1987). Lifestyle and consumer culture. Theory, Culture and Society, 4(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1984). Fish v fiss. Stanford Law Review, 36, 1325–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, D. (Ed.). (1942). Anthology of contemporary Latin–American poetry. Washington: Pan-American Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, H. (1983). The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture (pp. 111–125). Port Townsend: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, H. (Ed.). (1985). Postmodern culture. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1987). What is enlightenment? In P. Rainbow & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive social sciences: A second look (pp. 157–176). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., Cooper, R., & Martinez, L. T. (1992). Preface. International Studies of Management and Organization, 22(2), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R. D. (1992). Le gouvernement a 1’ere du postmodernisme. Optimum, 23(1), 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, D. (1985). Fragments of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frobel, F., Heinrichs, J., & Kreye, O. (1978). The new international division of labour. Social Science Information, 17(1), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, K. (1992). Classical and modern interactions: Postmodern architecture, multiculturalism, decline, and other issues. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin, J. (1998). Modern governance, yesterday and today: Some clarifications to be gained from French government policies. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gephart, R. P., Jr. (1996). Management, social issues and the postmodern era. In D. M. Boje, R. P. Gephart Jr, & T. J. Thatchenkery (Eds.), Postmodern management and organization theory (pp. 21–44). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gephart, R. P., Jr, & Pitter, R. (1993). The organizational basis of industrial accidents. Canada Journal of Management Inquiry, 3, 238–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self-dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J., & Thatchenkerry, T. J. (2004). Organization science as social construction: Postmodern potentials. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(2), 228–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1992, January 17). Uprooted signposts at century’s end. Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (2000). Towards a postmodern prince? The battle in Seattle as a moment in the new politics of globalization. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29(1), 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. (1988). Post-modernism and marxism. Antipode, 20(1), 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, C. (1979, October 31). Modern and Postmodern, William Dobell Memorial Lecture, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973). Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981). Modernity versus postmodernity. New German Critique, 22, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1983). Modernity—an incomplete project. In T. Docherty (Ed.), Postmodernism: A reader (pp. 98–109). Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, H. (Ed.). (1982). International marketing and purchase of industrial goods—An interaction approach. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, H. (1987). Industrial technological development. A network approach. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., Held, D., & McGrew, T. (Eds.). (1992). Modernity and its futures. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, M., & Strohmayer, U. (1992). Postmodernism (s)trained. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 82(2), 308–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1985). Manifesto for cyborgs—science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1981). The spatial fix—Hegel, Von Thunen and Marx. Antipode, 13(3), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1985). Consciousness and the urban experience. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1987). Flexible accumulation through urbanization: Reflections on ‘post-modernism’ in the American city. Antipode, 19(3), 260–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2001). Globalization and the “spatial fix”. Geographische Review, 2, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D., & Scott, A. (1989). The practice of human geography: theory and empirical specificity in the transition from Fordism to flexible accumulation. In B. Macmillan (Ed.), Remodelling geography (pp. 217–229). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1967). The literature of silence: From Henry Miller to Beckett and Burroughs. Encounter, 28(1), 74–82.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1970). Frontiers of criticism: Metaphors of silence. Virginia Quarterly Review, 46(1), 81–95.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1971). Postmodernism: A paracritical bibliography. New Literary History, 3(1), 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1973). The new gnosticism: Speculations on the aspect of a postmodern mind. Boundary, 21(3), 547–569.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1978). Culture, indeterminacy and immanence: margins of the (postmodern) age. Theory, Culture and Society, 1(1), 51–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1980). The question of postmodernism. Bucknell Review, 26(2), 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1985). The culture of postmodernism. Theory, Culture and Society, 2(3), 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatherley, O. (2009). Post-postmodernism? Review of the radicant, by Nicolas Bourriard. New Left Review, 59, 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel, V. (1992, March 1). The end of the modern era, New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebdige, D. (1988). Hiding in the light: On images and things. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellgren, B., & Stjernberg, T. (1987). Networks: an analytical tool for understanding complex decision processes. International Studies of Management and Organization, 17, 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, M. (2004). ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embededness. Progress in Human Geography, 28(2), 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heydebrand, W. (1989). New organizational forms. Work and Occupations, 16(3), 323–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., & Zeitlin, J. (1991). Flexible specialization versus post-fordism: Theory, evidence and policy implications. Economy and Society, 20(1), 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, K., & Macve, R. (1986). Accounting and examination; genealogy of disciplinary power. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(2), 105–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, F. S., & Gassenhaimer, J. B. (1987). Marketing and exchange. Journal of Marketing, 47, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. (1989). Naturalistic, humanistic, and interpretive enquiry: Challenges and ultimate potential. In E. C. Hirschman (Ed.), Interpretive consumer research (pp. 185–208). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, T. A. (2004). Post-industrialism, post-modernism and the reproduction of Vancouver’s central area: re-theorising the 21st century city. Urban Studies, 41(10), 1953–1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, A. (1984). Mapping the postmodern. New German Critique, 33, 5–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1995). Cultural shift in advanced industrialized societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1983). Postmodernism and the consumer society. In H. Foster (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture (pp. 111–125). Port Townsend: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 53–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1985). Postmodernism and consumer society. In H. Foster (Ed.), Postmodern culture (pp. 111–125). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, D. S. L. (1998). Postmodernism: A critical typology. Politics and Society, 26(1), 95–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, D. S. L. (2000). International relations and the challenge of postmodernism: Defending the discipline. Columbia SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1986a). The language of postmodern architecture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1986b). What is post-modernism?. London: Academy Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (Ed.). (1992a). The post-modern reader. London: Academy Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1992b). The post-modern agenda. In C. Jencks (Ed.) (1992a) The post-modern reader, London: Academy Editions, pp. 10–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Mattson, L. G. (1987). Interorganizational relations in industrial systems—a network approach compared with the transaction cost approach. International Studies of Management and Organization, 17, 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keidel, R. W. (1994). Rethinking organizational design. Academy of Management Executive, 4(4), 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. (1988). Postmodernism as social theory: Some challenges and problems. Theory, Culture and Society, 5, 239–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, K. (1992). The postmodern epoch of organization theory. International Studies of Management and Organization, 22(2), 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1980). Postmodernism? Bucknell Review, 25, 136–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (1995). From post-industrial to post-modern society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (1997). The post-modern condition. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacher, H. (2005). International transformation and the persistence of territoriality: Toward a new political geography of capitalism. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 26–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. (1988). Discourse or figure? Postmodernism as a ‘regime of signification’. Theory, Culture and Society, 5, 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. (1990). Sociology of postmodernism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O. (1991). Comment on “the future of bureaucracy and hierarchy in organizational theory: A report from the field”. In P. Bourdieu & J. S. Coleman (Eds.), Social theory for a changing society (pp. 90–93). Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, P. (1997). Postmodern welfare: Reconstructing an emancipatory project. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D. (1983). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of advanced intellectual capital. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 84(3), 171–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D. (1989). Modernism, post-modernism and the struggle for place. In J. Agnew & J. S. Duncan (Eds.), The power of place (pp. 44–65). Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loft, A. (1986). Towards a critical understanding of accounting; the case of cost in the UK 1914–1925. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(2), 137–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovering, J. (1989). Postmodernism, Marxism and locality research: The contribution of critical realism to the debate. Antipode, 21, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, T. W. (1991). The discipline of security studies and the codes of containment: Learning from Kuwait. Alternatives, 16, 315–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1987). La condition postmoderne. Kampen: Kok Agora. (Dutch translation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1997). Has globalization ended the rise and rise of the nation-state? Journal of International Political Economy, 4(3), 472–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, D. N. (1962). Cybernation: The silent conquest. Santa Barbara: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. (1995). Boundaries in flux: The ‘green line’ boundary between Israel and the West Bank, boundary and territory briefing (Vol. 5). Durham: International Boundaries Research Unit, University of Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nodoushani, O. (1987). A note on progress: Postmodern transformation in the systems age. Systems Research, 4(1), 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1992). A postmodern philosophy of markets. International Studies of Management and Organization, 22(2), 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcliffe, G., Bassett, K., & Hoare, T. (1996). The emergence of postmodernism on the urban waterfront. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(2), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C. (1993). The truth about postmodernism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C. (1995). Versions of apocalypse: Kant, Derida, Foucault. In M. Bull (Ed.), Apocalypse theory and the ends of the world (pp. 227–249). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, H. M. (1994). Restructuring, re-engineering and rightsizing: do the metaphors make sense? Academy of Management Executive, 4(4), 9–11.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1984). Contradictions of the welfare state. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, C. (1967). Human universe and other essays. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, N. (1991). Sovereignty: Outline of a contemporary history. Alternatives, 16(4), 425–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opello, W. C., Jr., & Rosow, S. J. (2004). The nation-state and global order: A historical introduction to contemporary politics. Boulder: Lynne Reinner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Østerud, Ø. (1996). Antinomies of postmodernism in international studies. Journal of Peace Research, 33(4), 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, G., & Clegg, S. (Eds.). (1996). Constituting management. Markets, meanings and identities. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. (1992). Post-modern organizations or postmodern organization theory? Organization Studies, 13(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R. (1983). Introduction: The global geography of contemporary capitalism. Economic Geography, 59(2), 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1993). American public policy: Promise and performance. Chatham: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, A. (1993, January 27). Forget all the theorizing, Japan puts chaos to work. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. (1968). The future of upward mobility, American Sociological Review, 33(1) 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poster, M. (1984). Foucault, marxism and history: Mode of production versus mode of information. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1992). Straw men build straw houses? Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 82(2), 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, R. (1994). Postmodernism and the rest of the world. Organization, 1(2), 305–340.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. (1991). Globalization, modernization and postmodernization. The ambiguous position of religion. In R. Robertson & W. R. Garrett (Eds.), Religion and global order (pp. 281–291). New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1989). The state in an era of cascading politics. In J. A. Caporaso (Ed.), The elusive state (pp. 17–48). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1992a). Governance, order and change in world politics. In J. N. Rosenau & E. O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1992b). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads and intrusions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (2004). Strong demand, huge supply: Governance in an emerging epoch. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multilevel governance (pp. 31–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rouleau, L., & Clegg, S. R. (1992). Postmodernism and postmodernity in organization analysis. Journal of Organizational Change, 5(1), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization, 47(1), 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C., & Zeitlin, J. (1985). Historical alternatives to mass production: Politics, markets and technology in nineteenth-century industrialization. Past and Present, 108, 133–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14(3), 271–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, M. (1992). Postmodern pictures of culture. International Studies of Management and Organization, 22(2), 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. (1995). Montheism and the violence of identities. Raritan, 14, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1988). New industrial spaces: Flexible production, organization and regional development in North America and Western Europe. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. G. (1974). Organization theory: A reassessment. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 242–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sextus Empiricus (1935) Against the logicians (R. G. Bury Trans.), (Loeb edn). Heinemann: London, p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. (1997). The state of globalization: Towards a theory of state transformation. Journal of International Political Economy, 4(3), 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. R. (1993). The ‘myth’ of postmodernism. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 84(3), 169–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, S. (1992). Beyond aesthetics. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1971). The metropolis and mental life. In D. Levine (Ed.), On individuality and social form (pp. 324–339). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. (1996). Transport and development in the third world. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1984). Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1987). The postmodernization of geography: A review. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 77(2), 289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1996). Margin/alia: Social justice and the new cultural politics. In A. Merrifield & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The urbanization of injustice. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Intellectual impostures. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, K. (1986). Humanism and anti-humanism. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalder, F. (2006). Manuel Castells. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steingard, D. S., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (1993). A postmodern deconstruction of total quality management (TQM). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 6(5), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J. (1993). Modern truth and postmodern incredulity: A hermeneutic deconstruction of the metanarrative of “scientific truth” in marketing research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. J. (1986). The geography of international economic disorder. In R. J. Johnston & P. J. Taylor (Eds.), A world in crisis? (pp. 12–67). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. J. (1997). The rise of soft capitalism. Cultural Values, 1(1), 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toynbee, A. (1946). A study of history. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, L. (2005). Towards a postmodern understanding of crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 31, 566–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ham, P. (2001). European integration and the postmodern condition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P., & Rajaratnam, D. (1987). Symbiotic marketing revisited. Journal of Marketing, 50, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1999). Indirect light: Extracted from polar inertia. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(1), 5–6–57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. (1991). State sovereignty and the articulation of political space/time. Millennium, 20, 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. (1999). The sharing of sovereignty: The European paradox. Political Studies, 47(3), 503–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warf, B. (1988). The resurrection of local uniqueness. In B. Golledge, H. Couclelis, & P. Gould (Eds.), A ground for common search (pp. 51–62). Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Geographical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warf, B. (1993a). Postmodernism and the localities debate: Ontological questions and epistemological implications. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 84(3), 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warf, B. (1993b). Embalming the detritus of modernism: reply to Short, Ley, De Pater, and Dijkink. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 84(3), 181–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. (2002). Theories of the information society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, W. (1983). Modernite et postmodernite. Les Cahiers de Philosophie, 6, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, W. (1987). Unsere postmoderne moderne. Weinheim: Acta Humanoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T. (1999). Beginning postmodernism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright-Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (1992). The postmodern invasion. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(3), 489–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Plymouth Business School, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK

    Michael Roe

Authors
  1. Michael Roe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Roe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roe, M. (2013). Postmodernism. In: Maritime Governance and Policy-Making. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4152-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4153-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation