Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hierarchies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Maritime Governance and Policy-Making

  • 1477 Accesses

Abstract

The role of hierarchies in governance and policy making is analysed using the maritime sector as a focus. The importance of hierarchies to the institutional governance framework that exists is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aalberts, T. E. (2004). The future of sovereignty in multilevel governance Europe—A constructivist reading. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aglietta, M. (1982). World capitalism in the eighties. New Left Review, 136(1), 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. (1997). Placing globalization. Theory, Culture and Society, 14, 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. (1998). Globalization and regional development: A relational perspective. Competition and Change, 3, 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1992). Non-marshallian nodes in global networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16, 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. (1996). The shifting stage of politics: New medieval and postmodern territorialities? Environment and Planning D, 14, 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme, R., & Jouve, B. (1996). Building the regional state: Europe and territorial organization in France. In L. Hooghe (Ed.), Cohesion policy and European integration: Building multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (2000). Two types of multi-level governance: Intergovernmental relations in German and EU regional policy. Regional and Federal Studies, 10(3), 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., & Eberlein, B. (1999). The Europeanization of regional policies: Patterns of multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), 329–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, M. (1990). The new competition. Cambridge: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, D. L., & Inayatullah, N. (2000). The Westphalian deferral. International Studies Review, 2(2), 29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, J. (2003). Beyond hierarchies and networks: Institutional logics and change in transboundary spaces. Governance, 16(4), 503–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon—On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76, 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T. A. (2007). European governance—Negotiation and competition in the shadow of hierarchy. Montreal, Canada: European Studies Association Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T. A. (2010). European governance: Negotiation and competition in the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(2), 191–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T.A., Guttenbrunner, S. & Seper, S. (2005) Conceptualizing new modes of governance in EU Enlargement, Report on the European commission new modes of governance project NEWGOV, Free University of Berlin, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1982). The wheels of commerce. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1997). Global, fragmented, hierarchical: Henri lefebvre’s geographies of globalization. Public Culture, 10(1), 135–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D, 16(4), 459–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1999). Beyond state-centrism? Territoriality and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 28(1), 39–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, K. (2000). Changing the rules: Reconceiving change in the Westphalian system. International Studies Review, 2(2), 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical man. Information, entropy, language and life. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1990). Global inscription: How foreign policy constitutes the United States. Alternatives, 15, 280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. A. (1996). The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, regulatory or post-modern? Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(1), 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm: New departures in corporate and regional development. Environment and Planning D, 11, 543–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, B. L. (1996). Policy implementation: The organizational challenge. World Development, 24(9), 1403–1415.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Alcantara, C. H. (1998). Uses and abuses of the concept of governance. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Senarclens, P. (1998). Governance and the crisis in the international mechanisms of regulation. International Social Science Journal, 50(55), 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. (1999). The conceptual cosmology of Paul Virilio. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(5–6), 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., & Thrift, N. (1992). The organization of production and the production of organization. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series, 17(3), 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., & Yeung, W. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2), 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, P., & Ormrod, J. S. (2007). Cosmic society. Towards a sociology of the universe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchacek, I. D. (1988). Multi-communal and bi-communal polities. In I. D. Duchachek, D. Latouche, & G. Stevenson (Eds.), Perforated sovereignties and international relations (pp. 3–28). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, B. (2003). Formal and informal governance in single market regulations. In T. Christiansen & S. Piattoni (Eds.), Informal governance in the EU (pp. 150–172). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, B., & Kerwer, D. (2004). New governance in the European Union: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epple, D., & Zelenitz, A. (1981). The implications of competition among jurisdictions: Does need Tiebout politics? Journal of Political Economy, 89(6), 1197–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J., & Gupta, A. (2002). Spatializing states: Towards an ethnography of neo-liberal governmentality. American Ethnologist, 29(4), 981–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. H. (1998). Clockspeed: Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage. Reading MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (1995). Toward the learning region. Futures, 27, 527–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. (1996). FOCJ: Competitive governments for Europe. International Review of Law and Economics, 16, 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetschy, J. (2003) The European employment strategy: multi-level governance and policy coordination; past, present, future, In J. Zeitlin & D.M. Trubeck (Eds.) Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy; European and American Experiments. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, E. (2000). Multi-level governance: Institutionelle besonderheiten und funktionsbedingungen europaischen mehrebenensystems. In E. Grande & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Wie problemlosungsfahig ist die EU? Baden Baden: Regieren im europäischen Mehrebenensystem, Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzaras, K. (2005) Multi-level governance, Europeanization and the poorest EU region: Epirus and the 2nd Hellenic Community Support Framework, 2nd LSE Symposium on Modern Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, H. T., Jr. (1988). Advocacy coalitions and the OCS leasing debate. Policy Sciences, 21, 213–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, H. T., Jr, & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1988). Advocacy coalitions and the practice of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 21, 263–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1997). From statism to pluralism. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (1998). The study of the European union II: the ‘new governance’ agenda and its rival. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 38–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D., & Maher, I. (2001). The open method as a new mode of governance. The case of soft economic policy coordination. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 719–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2001a)Multi-level governance and European integration, Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2001b) Types of multi-level governance, European integration on-line paper 5 (11), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-011a.htm.

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unravelling the central state. But how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (1995). Theoretical perspectives on European governance. European Law Journal, 1(2), 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (2001). The governance approach to European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(2), 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1988). Analytical debates and policy learning: analysis and change in the federal bureaucracy. Policy Sciences, 21, 169–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1999) Some critical reflections on globalization and its illogic(s). In K. Olds, P. Dicken, P. K. Kelly, L. Kong & H.W-C. Yeung (Eds.), Globalization and the Asia Pacific: Contested Territories (pp. 19–38). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. G. (1990). Sub-governments, policy communities and networks. Refilling the old bottles? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. G. (2001). The European union: An evolving system of multi-level governance…or government? Policy and Politics, 29(2), 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, M. (1989). International financial institutions and the politics of adjustment. In J. Nelson (Ed.), Fragile coalitions: The politics of economic adjustment (pp. 139–159). Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1795) Perpetual peace. In H. Reiss (Ed.), (1991) Kant: Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P. F. (1999). The geographies and politics of globalization. Progress in Human Geography, 23(3), 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerwer, D. & Teutsch, M. (2001) Transport policy in the European union. In A. Hertier, D. Kerwer, C. Knill, D. Lehmkuhl, T. Teutsch & A-C. Douillet (Eds.), Differential Europe: The European Union impact on national policymaking (pp. 23–56). Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (1996). Catching-up with change: The transformation of governance in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 3, 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. A. (2003). The new sovereignty in international relations. International Studies Review, 5, 303–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R., & Robertson, P. (1995). Firms, markets and economic change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l’éspace. Paris: Éditions Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1976a). De l’état: L’etat dans le monde moderne (Vol. 1). Paris: Union Générale d’Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1976b). De l’état: De hegel a marx par staline (Vol. 2). Paris: Union Générale d’Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1977). De l’état: Le mode de production étatique (Vol. 3). Paris: Union Générale d’Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenschow, A. (2002). New regulatory approaches in ‘greening’ EU policies. European Law Journal, 8(1), 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, A. (1960). The great chain of being. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, T. W. (1991). The discipline of security studies and the codes of containment: Learning from Kuwait. Alternatives, 16, 315–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G. (1997). Institutional thickness and industrial governance in Lowland Scotland. Area, 29, 299–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G. (2001). Beyond soft institutionalism: Accumulation, regulation and their geographical fixes. Environment and Planning A, 33(7), 1145–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multi-level governance in the EC. In A. Cafruny & G. Rosenthal (Eds.), The state of the European Community: Volume II. The Maastricht debates and beyond (pp. 391–410). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., Hooghe, L. & Blank. K. (1996) European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance, Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 342–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2004). Editorial: Geography: Making a difference in a globalizing world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series, 29, 147–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. T. (1997). Power shift. Foreign Affairs, 76(1), 50–66.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (1976). Conceptual models of organizational decision-making and their application to the policy process. In G. Hofstede & S. Kassem (Eds.), European contribution to organization theory (pp. 114–125). Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, M. D. (2005). Costs and challenges of polycentric governance. Workshop on analyzing problems of polycentric governance in the growing EU, Humboldt University, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrien, F.-X. (1998). Governance and modern welfare states. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. (1980). The world polity and the authority of the nation-state. In A. J. Bergesen (Ed.), Studies of the modern world system (pp. 109–137). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 1, 144–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyer, J. (2003). Discourse and order in the EU: A deliberative approach to multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(4), 687–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N. (2006). The government and politics of the European Union. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1985) Formulating the elements of institutional analysis. Institutional analysis conference, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1986). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice, 48, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallis, A. A. (2006). Institutional dynamism in EU policy-making: Evolution of the EU maritime safety policy. Journal of European Integration, 28(2), 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of coordination. Public Administration, 76, 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2001). Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards a multi-level governance. Policy and Politics, 29(2), 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, D. J. (1972). Of blind men, elephants and international integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 10(3), 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, D. J. (1999). Institutionalism, intergovernmentalism and European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37, 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raco, M. (1998). Assessing inheritance thickness in the local context: a comparison of Cardiff and Sheffield. Environment and Planning A, 30, 975–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. M. (2001). The code of conduct against harmful tax competition: Open coordination method in disguise. Paris: NOTRE Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. M. (2003). The Europeanization of public policy. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 27–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronit, K., & Schneider, V. (1999). Global governance through private organizations. Governance, 12(3), 243–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Governance, order and change in world politics. In J. N. Rosenau & E. O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (2000). The governance of fragmegration: Neither a world republic nor a global interstate system. Quebec: Congress of the International Political Sciences Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstiehl, P., & Petitot, J. (1974). Automate asocial et systèmes acentrés. Communications, 22, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1998). What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge, International Organization, 52(4), 855–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C. (1994). Flexible specialization and the re-emergence of regional economies. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-fordism: A reader (pp. 101–156). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1992). Europaisches demokratiedefizit und deutscher föderalismus. Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis, 3, 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1994a). Community and autonomy: Multi-level policy-making in the European union. Journal of European Public Policy, 1(2), 219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1994b). Games real actors could play. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play. Actor centred institutionalism in policy research. Boulder CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J., & Trubeck, D. (2002). Mind the gap; law and new approaches to governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 8(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelcher, C. (2005). Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism and the design of democratic government. Governance, 18(1), 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (1997). The real new world order. Foreign Affairs, 76(5), 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1990) Uneven Development; Nature, Capital and the Production of Space, Blackwell: Oxford, 2nd Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1992). Geography, difference and the politics of scale. In J. Doherty, E. Graham, & M. Malek (Eds.), Postmodernism and the social sciences (pp. 57–79). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1997). Antinomies of space and nature in Henri Lefebvre’s the production of space. Philosophy and Geography, 2, 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smouts, M. (1998). The proper use of governance in international relations. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies; the reassertion of space in critical social theory. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1996). Margin/alia: Social justice and the new cultural politics. In A. Merrifield & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The urbanization of injustice. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (1996) A dogma of our times—the separation of policy-making and implementation, Public Money and Management, July–September, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, P. (2005). Stretching concepts too far? Multi-level governance, policy transfer and the politics of scale in South-East Europe, Southeast European politics, VI, 2, 66–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–188). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D, 18, 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczerski, K. (2004) The EU multi-level governance in post-communist countries—Challenge in governability for the new member states. 12th NISPAcee Annual Conference, Vilnius, Lithuania, May 13–15th.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommel, I. (2000). Jenseits von regulative und distributive: Policy-Making der EU und die transformation von staatlichkeit. In E. Grande & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Wie problemlosungsfahig ist die EU? Regieren im europaischen mehrebenensystem. Baden Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. (1999). The sharing of sovereignty: The European paradox. Political Studies, 47(3), 503–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2004). Politics as a vocation. In M. Weber (Ed.), The vocation lectures. Indianapolis IN: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, J., & Caviedes, A. (2002). The open method of coordination in immigration policy. A tool for prying open fortress Europe? Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. (2005). Coping with globalization through a collaborative federate mode of governance. Policy Studies, 26(2), 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurn, M. (2000). Democratic governance beyond the nation-state; the EU and other international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 183–221.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Plymouth Business School, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK

    Michael Roe

Authors
  1. Michael Roe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Roe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roe, M. (2013). Hierarchies. In: Maritime Governance and Policy-Making. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4153-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4152-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4153-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation