Abstract
This chapter shall analyze the options users of online social networks like Facebook have to adjust privacy settings. As the theoretical background of this evaluation, an institutional economics point of view shall be applied. Against this background, the following analysis of how Facebook as a provider of an online social network designs its platform in such a way that their own interests, as many users’ data to keep visible and searchable, are implemented. Both the GUI of the platform (website) and the various possibilities for mobile use, such as special “mobile” versions of the website and smartphone applications (apps) for various platforms, will be evaluated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Regulation by physical architecture can be found in, for example, urban and transport planning, and in the design of public spaces such as shopping malls and supermarkets (cf., e.g., [3]).
- 2.
One example of the difficulties in regulating globally networked systems became apparent during the political upheavals in Egypt in early 2011. Because the government in power at the time was unable to limit access to the websites being used for communication and coordination among the opposition movement, it decided that its only course of action was to shut off access to the entire Internet.
- 3.
Although I will not go into DRM systems in any further detail, this example shows that technologically supported regulation does not only shape the specific regulatory area but can also have far-reaching effects on other legally protected rights (cf., e.g., [18]).
References
Accenture: Mobile Web Watch 2010. website: http://www.accenture.com/Countries/Germany/Services/By_Industry/Electro%nics_and_High_Tech/R_and_I/Mobile-Web-Watch-2010.htm (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Acquisti, A., Gross, R.: Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In: Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Cambridge, pp. 36–58. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Allen, J.: Ambient power: Berlin’s pOtsdamer platz and the seductive logic of public spaces. Urban Stud. 43(2), 441 (2006)
allfacebook.com. Facebook for android statistic. website: http://statistics.allfacebook.com/applications/single/facebook-for-andr%oid/350685531728/ (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
allfacebook.com. Facebook for blackberry statistic. website: http://statistics.allfacebook.com/applications/single/facebook-for-blac%kberry-smartphones/2254487659/ (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
allfacebook.com. Facebook for iphone statistic. website: http://statistics.allfacebook.com/applications/single/facebook-for-ipho%ne/6628568379/ (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Brandtzæg, P.B., Lüders, M., Skjetne, J.H.: Too many facebook “Friends”? content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 26(11), 1006 (2010)
Camp, L.J.J.: DRM: doesn’t really mean digital copyright management. SSRN Electron. J. 78–87 (2002)
Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J.P., Horn, A.-K., Hughes, B.N.: Facebook and online privacy: attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 15(1), 83–108 (2009)
Facebook. Facebook principles. website: http://www.facebook.com/principles.php (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Facebook. Facebook privacy policy. website: http://www.facebook.com/policy.php/ (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Facebook. Facebook terms of use. website: http://www.facebook.com/terms.php?ref=pf/ (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Facebook. Platform statistics. Website: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Facebook. Privacy explanation. website: http://www.facebook.com/privacy/explanation.php (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Grimmelmann, J.: Regulation by software. Yale Law J. 114(7), 1719–1758 (2005)
Gross, R., Acquisti, A.: Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, Alexandria, pp. 71–80. ACM, New York (2005)
Hodgson, G.M., Calatrava, J.: What are institutions. J. Econ. Issues 40(1), 1 (2006)
Kerr, I., Bailey, J.: The implications of digital rights management for privacy and freedom of expression. J. Inf. Commun. Ethic Soc. 2(2), 85–95 (2004)
Lessig, L.: Code version 2. 0. Basic Books, New York (2006)
Lipford, H.R., Besmer, A., Watson, J.: Understanding privacy settings in facebook with an audience view. In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Usability, Psychology, and Security, San Francisco, pp. 1–8. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2008)
McKeon, M.: The evolution of privacy on facebook. website: http://mattmckeon.com/facebook-privacy/ (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Mostyn, S.: Facebook population equivalent to third-biggest country on earth. website: http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/201029/5922/Facebook-populatio%n-equivalent-to-third-biggest-country-on-Earth/ (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Opsahl, K.: Facebook’s eroding privacy policy: a timeline. website: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebook-timeline (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Orwat, C., Raabe, O., Buchmann, E., Anandasivam, A., Freytag, J.-C., Helberger, N., Ishii, K., Lutterbeck, B., Neumann, D., Otter, T., Pallas, F., Reussner, R., Sester, P., Weber, K., Werle, R.: Software als institution und ihre gestaltbarkeit. Inform. Spektrum 33(6), 626–633 (2009)
Ostrom, E.: Die Verfassung der Allmende: jenseits von Staat und Markt. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen (1999)
Reidenberg, J.R.: Lex informatica: the formulation of information policy rules through technology. Tex. Law Rev. 76(3), 553 (1998)
Richter, R., Furubotn, E.G.: Neue Institutionenökonomik: Eine Einführung und kritische Würdigung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen (2003)
Strater, K., Lipford, H.R.: Strategies and struggles with privacy in an online social networking community. In: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2008: People and Computers XXII: Culture, Creativity, Interaction-Volume 1, Liverpool, pp. 111–119. British Computer Society, Swindon (2008)
techxav: If facebook were a country. website: http://www.techxav.com/2010/03/19/if-facebook-were-a-country/ (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
The Nielsen Company: The state of mobile apps. website: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/the-state-of-mobile-apps/ (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Zippelius, R.: Juristische Methodenlehre: Eine Einführung. Beck, München (1985)
Zuckerberg, M.: 500 million stories. blog: http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=409753352130 (2010) [Online; last visit: 03.03.2011]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ulbricht, MR. (2012). Privacy Settings in Online Social Networks as a Conflict of Interests: Regulating User Behavior on Facebook . In: Abraham, A. (eds) Computational Social Networks. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4051-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4051-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4050-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4051-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)