Abstract
In the nuclear power plants (NPPs), the earthquake could make a critical result because of its catastrophe risk. It is important to maintain the stability of the system without the radiation material leak from the reactor. The system dynamics (SD) is used in analysis by the random sampling quantification of the earthquake happening due to unexpected characteristics, which is one of non-linear algorithms. There is a dynamical quantification which is incorporated with the loop sequence of the time step procedures by the feedback simulations. The Power Plant Analysis has the highest value among three values including Disaster Analysis and Earthquake Analysis. For Disaster Analysis, there is the highest value on 2015. For Earthquake Analysis, there is the highest value on 2047. The highest value of summation for three values is in the year 2050, which shows the value of 28.45 times (=626/22) higher than the initial value and highest than any other value. Using SD method, the easy and logical analysis for the safety assessment is constructed by a computer code.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chen JT (1993) Consideration of external events in the individual plant examination program. Nucl Eng Des 142:231–237
Konno T (2003) Transaction of the 17th international conference structural mechanics in reactor technology (SMiRT 17). Prague, Czech Republic
GNS Science (2012) The worldwide earthquake facts and statistics
Forrester JW (1969) Urban dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Waltham
Forrester JW (1971) World dynamics. Wright-Allen press, Cambridge
Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. Productivity press, Cambridge
Forrester JW (1968) Principles of systems. Productivity press, Cambridge
Forrester JW (1975) Collected papers of Jay W. Forrester. Pegasus Communications, Waltham
Eberlein RL (1989) Simplification and understanding of models. Syst Dyn Rev 5(1):51–68
Kampmann CE (1996) Feedback loop gains and system behavior. In: Proceedings of the 1996 international system dynamics conference Boston, Albany, USA
Mojtahedzadeh MT (1997) A path taken: computer-assisted heuris tics for understanding dynamic systems. PhD dissertation, Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy, State University of New York at Albany, NY
Schmidt MJ, Gary MS (2002) Combining systems and conjoint analysis for strategic decision making with an automotive high-tech SME. Syst Dyn Rev 18(3):359–379
Liehr M, Grobler A, Klein M, Milling PM (2001) Cycles in the sky: understanding and managing business cycles in the airline market. Syst Dyn Rev 17(4):311−332
Radzicki M, Taylor R (1997) U.S. department of energy’s introduction to system dynamics, a systems approach to understanding complex policy issues, version 1. Sustainable Solutions, Inc., Como
Stanisv N, Milan P (1987) Nuclear power plant aging and life extension: safety aspects, IAEA Bulletin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woo, T. (2012). Dynamical Seismic Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Earthquake. In: Atomic Information Technology. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4030-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4030-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4029-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4030-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)