Skip to main content

Nuclear Safety Assessment for the Passive System of the Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) in Safety Margin Estimation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atomic Information Technology

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

Abstract

The probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) for gas-cooled nuclear power plants has been investigated where the operational data are deficient, because there is not any commercial power plant. Therefore, it is necessary to use the statistical data for the basic event constructions. Several estimations for the safety margin are introduced for the quantification of the failure frequency in the basic event, which is made by the concept of the impact and affordability. Trend of probability of failure (TPF) and fuzzy converter (FC) are introduced using the safety margin, which shows the simplified and easy configurations for the event characteristics. The mass flow rate in the natural circulation is studied for the modeling. The potential energy in the gravity, the temperature and pressure in the heat conduction, and the heat transfer rate in the internal stored energy are also investigated. The values in the probability set are compared with those of the fuzzy set modeling. Non-linearity of the safety margin is expressed by the fuzziness of the membership function. This artificial intelligence analysis of the fuzzy set could enhance the reliability of the system comparing to the probabilistic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

X:

Variable

I(x):

Impact function

A(x):

Affordability function

sm(x):

Safety margin sm(x) = I(x) − A(x)

\( N_{n} \) :

Nominal value

\( N_{I} \) :

Actual value

\( \mu_{A} ,\,\,\mu_{I} \) :

Mean of \( N_{A} ,\,\,N_{I} \)

\( \sigma_{A}^{2} ,\,\,\sigma_{I}^{2} \) :

Variance of \( N_{A} ,\,\,N_{I} \)

References

  1. Lohnet GH, Nabielek H, Schenk W (1988) Teh fuel element of the HTR-Modules, a prerequisite of an inherently safe reactor. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on HTGR’s. Paper II.24. San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weisbrodt IA (2003) Inherently safety design features of the HTR-Module, IAEA-CN-48/125. HTGR, The modular-high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR) in the U.S., Doe-HTGR-87-088

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goodjohn AJ (1991) Summary of gas-cooled reactor programs. Energy 16:79–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. An S, Hayashi T (1991) Studies on the concepts of HTGR plants viable in Japan Part I: outline of the activities. Energy 16:137–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. An S, Hayashi T (1991) Studies on the concepts of HTGR plants viable in Japan Part II: discussion of the results. Energy 16:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nickel H, Bodmann E, Seehafer HJ (1991) The materials program for the HTR in the frg: integrity concept, status of the development of high temperature materials and design codes. Energy 16:221–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bianchi F, Burgazzi L, D’auria F, Galassi GM, Ricotti ME, Oriani L (2001) Evaluation of the reliability of a passive system. International conference of nuclear energy in central Europe

    Google Scholar 

  8. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (2007) Experiment database:I-NERI final project technical report. Korea

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nayak AK, Sinha RK (2007) Role of passive system in advanced reactor. Prog Nucl Energy 49:486–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burgazzi L (2007) Thermal-hydraulic passive system reliability-baseddesign approach. Reliab Eng Sys Saf 92:1250–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zio E, Baraldi P (2003) Sensitivity analysis and fuzzy modeling for passive systems reliability assessment. Ann Nucl Energy 31:271–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. USNRC (2003) Regulatory effectiveness of the anticipated transient without scram rule, NUREG-1780. USA

    Google Scholar 

  13. USNRC (1993) SECY-93-092, PRA attachment 4. USNRC Commission Papers. USA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brown LD, Cai TT, Dasgupta A (2001) Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statis Sci 16:101–133

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmermann HJ (2001) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors thank to the Dr. S. J. Han in Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) in Korea for his research discussions. It is also thanked to the financial support from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woo, T. (2012). Nuclear Safety Assessment for the Passive System of the Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) in Safety Margin Estimation. In: Atomic Information Technology. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4030-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4030-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4029-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4030-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics