Abstract
The probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) for gas-cooled nuclear power plants has been investigated where the operational data are deficient, because there is not any commercial power plant. Therefore, it is necessary to use the statistical data for the basic event constructions. Several estimations for the safety margin are introduced for the quantification of the failure frequency in the basic event, which is made by the concept of the impact and affordability. Trend of probability of failure (TPF) and fuzzy converter (FC) are introduced using the safety margin, which shows the simplified and easy configurations for the event characteristics. The mass flow rate in the natural circulation is studied for the modeling. The potential energy in the gravity, the temperature and pressure in the heat conduction, and the heat transfer rate in the internal stored energy are also investigated. The values in the probability set are compared with those of the fuzzy set modeling. Non-linearity of the safety margin is expressed by the fuzziness of the membership function. This artificial intelligence analysis of the fuzzy set could enhance the reliability of the system comparing to the probabilistic analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- X:
-
Variable
- I(x):
-
Impact function
- A(x):
-
Affordability function
- sm(x):
-
Safety margin sm(x) = I(x) − A(x)
- \( N_{n} \) :
-
Nominal value
- \( N_{I} \) :
-
Actual value
- \( \mu_{A} ,\,\,\mu_{I} \) :
-
Mean of \( N_{A} ,\,\,N_{I} \)
- \( \sigma_{A}^{2} ,\,\,\sigma_{I}^{2} \) :
-
Variance of \( N_{A} ,\,\,N_{I} \)
References
Lohnet GH, Nabielek H, Schenk W (1988) Teh fuel element of the HTR-Modules, a prerequisite of an inherently safe reactor. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on HTGR’s. Paper II.24. San Diego
Weisbrodt IA (2003) Inherently safety design features of the HTR-Module, IAEA-CN-48/125. HTGR, The modular-high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR) in the U.S., Doe-HTGR-87-088
Goodjohn AJ (1991) Summary of gas-cooled reactor programs. Energy 16:79–106
An S, Hayashi T (1991) Studies on the concepts of HTGR plants viable in Japan Part I: outline of the activities. Energy 16:137–141
An S, Hayashi T (1991) Studies on the concepts of HTGR plants viable in Japan Part II: discussion of the results. Energy 16:143–153
Nickel H, Bodmann E, Seehafer HJ (1991) The materials program for the HTR in the frg: integrity concept, status of the development of high temperature materials and design codes. Energy 16:221–242
Bianchi F, Burgazzi L, D’auria F, Galassi GM, Ricotti ME, Oriani L (2001) Evaluation of the reliability of a passive system. International conference of nuclear energy in central Europe
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (2007) Experiment database:I-NERI final project technical report. Korea
Nayak AK, Sinha RK (2007) Role of passive system in advanced reactor. Prog Nucl Energy 49:486–498
Burgazzi L (2007) Thermal-hydraulic passive system reliability-baseddesign approach. Reliab Eng Sys Saf 92:1250–1257
Zio E, Baraldi P (2003) Sensitivity analysis and fuzzy modeling for passive systems reliability assessment. Ann Nucl Energy 31:271–301
USNRC (2003) Regulatory effectiveness of the anticipated transient without scram rule, NUREG-1780. USA
USNRC (1993) SECY-93-092, PRA attachment 4. USNRC Commission Papers. USA
Brown LD, Cai TT, Dasgupta A (2001) Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statis Sci 16:101–133
Zimmermann HJ (2001) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA
Acknowledgments
Authors thank to the Dr. S. J. Han in Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) in Korea for his research discussions. It is also thanked to the financial support from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woo, T. (2012). Nuclear Safety Assessment for the Passive System of the Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) in Safety Margin Estimation. In: Atomic Information Technology. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4030-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4030-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4029-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4030-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)