Skip to main content

Improving Asset Management Process Modelling and Integration

  • Chapter
Asset Condition, Information Systems and Decision Models

Part of the book series: Engineering Asset Management Review ((EAMR))

Abstract

Asset management (AM) processes play an important role in assisting enterprises to manage their assets more efficiently. To visualise and improve AM processes, the processes need to be modelled using certain process modelling methodologies. Understanding the requirements for AM process modelling is essential for selecting or developing effective AM process modelling methodologies. However, little research has been done on analysing the requirements. This paper attempts to fill this gap by investigating the features of AM processes. It is concluded that AM process modelling requires intuitive representation of its processes, ‘fast’ implementation of the process modelling, effective evaluation of the processes and sound system integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Weske M (2007) Business process management: concept, languages, architectures. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst W, van Hee K (2002) Workflow management: models, methods, and systems. MIT Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen H, Wall B, Zaremba M, Chen Y, Browne J (2004) Integration of business modelling methods for enterprise information system analysis and user requirements gathering. Comput Ind 54(2):307–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney T (2003) Competitive information in small businesses. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer N (2007) A survey of business process initiatives. BP Trends. http://www.bptrends.com/members_surveys/deliver.cfm?report_id=1001&target=FINALPDF 1-23-07.pdf&return=surveys_landing.cfm

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand National Asset Management Steering Group (2004) Optimised decision making guidelines: a sustainable approach to managing infrastructure. Thames, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • International Infrastructure Management Manual 2006 Edition. Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia, Level 12, 447 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frolov V, et al (2009) Building an ontology and process architecture for engineering asset management. In: Proceedings of the 4th world congress on engineering asset management, Athens, Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Frolov V, et al (2008) Identifying core function of asset management. In: Proceedings of the 3rd world congress on engineering asset management and intelligent maintenance systems, Beijing, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Sun Y, Mathew J (2007) Asset management process and its representation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd world congress on engineering asset management and 4th international conference on condition monitoring, Harrogate, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Weichhardt F (1999) Modelling and evaluation of processes based enterprise goals. In: Scholz-Reiter B, Stahlmann H-D, Nethe A (eds) Process modeling. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 115–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Fernández JF, Crespo Márquez A (2009) Framework for implementation of maintenance management in distribution network service providers. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(10):1639–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheer A-W (1999) ARIS – business process frameworks, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mertins K, Jochem R (1999) Quality-oriented design of business processes. Kluwer, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green P, Rosemann M (2000) Integrated process modelling: an ontological evaluation. Inf Syst 25(2):73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Sun Y, Mathew J (2004) Asset management process modelling. In: Proceedings of the international conference of maintenance societies. Maintenance Engineering Society of Australia, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Object Management Group (2010) Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0 (Accessed 14 March 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker JC (2010) Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN. Bus Process Manage J 16(1):181–201

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Decker G, et al. (2009) Interacting services: from specification to execution. Data Knowl Eng 68(10):946–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams M (2010) YAWL – user manual. http://www.yawlfoundation.org/yawldocs/YAWLUserManual2.0.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchins DK (2003) Advanced systems thinking, engineering, and management. Artech, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller J-A (1999) Automatic model generation in process modeling. In: Scholz-Reiter B, Stahlmann H-D, Nethe A (eds) Process modeling. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 17–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weber B, et al. (2009) Providing integrated life cycle support in process-aware information systems. Int J Coop Inf Syst 18(1):115–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkner P, Werners B (2000) A decision support system for business process planning. Eur J Oper Res 125(3):633–647

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocca N, Russo S, Vittorini V (1999) The modelling process and Petri nets: reasoning on different approaches. In: Scholz-Reiter B, Stahlmann H-D, Nethe A (eds) Process modeling. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 37–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cha S, et al. (2003) System evaluation of fault trees using real-time model checker UPPAAL. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 82(1):11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, et al. (2006) Evaluation of information technology investment: a data envelopment analysis approach. Comput Oper Res 33:1368–1379

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J, Presley A, Liles D (1997) The strategic evaluation of candidate business process reengineering projects. Int J Prod Econ 50(2–3):261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann T, Lamping R, Massow C (1998) Intelligent decision support. J Mater Process Technol 76(2):257–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland CP, Shaw DR, Kawalek P (2005) BP's multi-enterprise asset management system. Inf Softw Technol 47(4):999–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sun, Y., Ma, L., Mathew, J. (2012). Improving Asset Management Process Modelling and Integration. In: Amadi-Echendu, J., Willett, R., Brown, K., Mathew, J. (eds) Asset Condition, Information Systems and Decision Models. Engineering Asset Management Review. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2924-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2924-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2923-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2924-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics