Abstract
Informed consent is more than a process; it is a gestalt that embraces the concept of the provider (physician or other practitioner) and the patient engaging in a two-way exchange of ideas to best determine a medical course of action. In pediatric cases, the parents are the decision-makers for their children and are presumed to have the best interest of the child in mind. The most important point to keep in mind is that patients (parents) come with preconceived expectations and often cultural considerations. It is important to be sensitive to these and at the same time present a well-balanced summary of the pros and cons of circumcision. To that “a well-crafted informed consent document outlining the procedure, goals of surgery, risks, benefits, and expected outcomes of the procedure allows an opportunity to confirm that the patient has understood and retained the information needed to reach a meaningful decision.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
McCullough LB, Jones JW, Brody BA, editors. Surgical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 15.
De Lourdes Levy M, Larcher V, Kurz R. Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the ethics working group of the confederation of European specialists in pediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr. 2003;162:629.
Steven M, Broadis E, Carachi R, Brindley N. Sign on the dotted line: parental consent. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24:847.
Cooke RWI. Good practice in consent. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;10:63.
Task Force on Circumcision, American Academy of Pediatrics. Report of the task force on circumcision. Pediatrics. 1989;84:388.
Lerman SE, Liao JC. Neonatal circumcision. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48(6):1539.
Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society. Neonatal circumcision revisited. Can Med Assoc J. 1996;154(6):769.
Wheeler R. Consent for non-therapeutic male circumcision: an exception to the rule? Arch Dis Child. 2008;93(10):825.
British Medical Association. The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors. J Med Ethics. 2004;30:259.
Singh D. BMA says non-therapeutic circumcision needs consent of both parents. Br Med J. 2003;326(7393):782.
Stein M, Marx M, Taggert S, Bass R. Routine neonatal circumcision: the gap between contemporary policy and practice. J Fam Pract. 1982;83 Suppl 1:93.
Diekema DS. Boldt v. Boldt: a pediatric ethics perspective. J Clin Ethics. 2009;20(3):251.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vemulakonda, V.M. (2012). Informed Consent: Principles for Elective Circumcision. In: Bolnick, D., Koyle, M., Yosha, A. (eds) Surgical Guide to Circumcision. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2858-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2858-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2857-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2858-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)