Abstract
This paper looks at the impact of charging for road use in cities where an intermodal equilibrium prevails, where increased transit use leads to efficiency gains, and where the roads are congested. Demand is assumed to be elastic and transit is assumed not to be directly affected by road congestion, as would be the case where transit uses a reserved track. It is shown that at a stable intermodal user equilibrium a version of the Downs-Thompson paradox applies if the efficiency gains arising from increased transit use are passed on to passengers as reduced generalised costs (reduced fares, increased service frequencies or both). The paradox arises because the imposition of a road user charge not only reduces road congestion but also reduces the generalised cost of travel at the intermodal user equilibrium, including the road user charge for those who choose to drive. The paper then goes on to consider what would be expected if, rather passing on the efficiency gains to transit users, the transit operator(s) as a whole maximise profits, and establishes that the paradox no longer arises. The implications of these findings for the regulation of transit fares are considered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abraham JE, Hunt JD (2001) Transit system management, equilibrium mode split and the Downs-Thomson paradox. TRB conference preprint. University of Calgary, Department of Civil Engineering, Calgary
Bell MGH, Wichiensin M (2008) Profit maximising transit in combination with a congestion charge: an inter-modal equilibrium model. In: Richardson HW, Christine Bae C-H (eds) Road congestion pricing in Europe: Implications for the United States. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 23–38
Downs A (1962) The law of peak-hour expressway congestion. Traffic Q 16:393–409
Hau TD (1992) The economic fundamentals of road pricing:a diagrammatic analysis. World Bank Policy Research WPS 1071 (reproduced in Transportmetrica 1(2):1–149)
Holden, DJ (1989) Wardrop’s third principle: urban traffic congestion and traffic policy. J Transp Econ Policy 23:239–262
Mogridge MJH (1990) Travel in towns: jam yesterday, jam today and jam tomorrow? Macmillan Press, London
Mogridge MJH, Holden DJ, Bird J, Terzis GC (1987) The Downs-Thomson paradox and the transportation planning process. Int J Transp Econ 14:283–311
Thomson JM (1977) Great cities and their traffic, Gollancz, London (Published in Peregrine Books, 1978)
Wichiensin M, Bell MGH, Yang H (2007) Impact of congestion charging on the transit market:an inter-modal equilibrium model. Transp Res A 41(7):703–713
Wichiensin M, Bell MGH (2008) Transit market effects on socially optimal congestion charging. In: Steg L, Verhoef E, Bliemer M, van Wee B (eds) Pricing in road transport: a multi-disciplinary perspective. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 131–150
Wikipedia (2011) Downs-Thompson paradox. Online: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downs%E2%80%93Thomson_paradox Accessed 14 Feb 2011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bell, M.G.H., Wichiensin, M. (2012). Road Use Charging and Inter-Modal User Equilibrium: The Downs-Thompson Paradox Revisited. In: Inderwildi, O., King, S. (eds) Energy, Transport, & the Environment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2716-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2717-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)