Skip to main content

Toward a Global Low Carbon Fuel Standard for Road Transport

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy, Transport, & the Environment

Abstract

A new policy instrument, known as a low carbon fuel standard (LCFS), is a promising approach to decarbonize transportation fuels. An LCFS has several important features: it applies a life cycle carbon intensity standard, incorporates market mechanisms by allowing credit trading, and targets all transport fuels. A harmonized international framework is needed that builds on newly enacted LCFS policies adopted in California and the European Union.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Burtraw D (ed) (2007) Cap and trade policy to achieve greenhouse gas emission targets. Civil Society Institute, Newton

    Google Scholar 

  2. CARB (2009) Staff report: proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard—initial statement of reasons. Staff report, vol 1. California Air Resources Board. http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/030409lcfs_isor_vol1_OnlinePDF.pdf

  3. EC (2008) European Parliament legislative resolution of 17 December 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/70/EC as regards the specification of petrol, diesel and gas-oil and introducing a mechanism to monitor and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the use of road transport fuels and amending Council Directive 1999/32/EC, as regards the specification of fuel used by inland waterway vessels and repealing Directive 93/12/EEC (COM(2007)0018–C6-0061/2007–2007/0019(COD))

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319(5867):1235–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbs HK, Johnston M, Foley JA, Holloway T, Monfreda C, Ramankutty N, Zaks D (2008) Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology. Environ Res Lett 3:034001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greene DL, German J, Delucchi MA (2009) Fuel economy: the case for market failure. In: Sperling D, Cannon JS (eds) Reducing climate impacts in the transportation sector. Springer Science + Business Media, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holland S, Hughes J, Knittel C (2009) Greenhouse gas reductions under low carbon fuel standards? Am Econ J Econ Policy 1(1):106–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. NRC (2009) Liquid transportation fuels from coal and biomass: technological status, costs, and environmental impacts. America’s Energy Future Panel on Alternative Liquid Transportation Fuels; National Academy of Sciences; National Academy of Engineering; National Research Council. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12620

  9. OECD (2008) Economic assessment of biofuel support policies. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sperling D, Gordon D (2009) Two billion cars: driving toward sustainability. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stavins R (2008) Addressing climate change with a comprehensive U.S. Cap-and-Trade System. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24(2):298–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson E, Lynd L, Pacala S, Reilly J, Searchinger T, Somerville C, Williams R (2009) Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325:270–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Unruh GC (2002) Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 30(4):317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. US EPA (2009) Regulation of fuels and fuel additives: changes to renewable fuel standard program. 40 CFR Part 80 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yeh S, Lutsey N, Parker NC (2009) Assessment of technologies to meet a low carbon fuel standard. Environ Sci Technol 43(18):6907–6914. doi:10.1021/es900262w

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sperling is a board member of the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the government agency that enacted California’s LCFS on April 23, 2009. Yeh received financial support from CARB to lead research effort to support implementation of California’s LCFS. The view and opinions herein are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent the views of the sponsors or any other organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Sperling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sperling, D., Yeh, S. (2012). Toward a Global Low Carbon Fuel Standard for Road Transport. In: Inderwildi, O., King, S. (eds) Energy, Transport, & the Environment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2716-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2717-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics