Abstract
Advanced mathematical tools are still under development to allow the classification of more complicated experimental data sets, such as examining the content of mind wandering or detecting the state of consciousness of a patient showing no response to a command. Nevertheless, in view of the recent advances in multivariate pattern analysis, brain decoding techniques will certainly become more common in the study of consciousness. Their application as a diagnostic tool to differentiate patients presents obvious advantages such as objectiveness, automation and the fact that a posterior probability can be provided with the final prediction, compared to current time-consuming and subjective criteria.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on bloodoxygenation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:9868–72.
Friston KJ, Ashburner JT, Kiebel SJ, et al. Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of functional brain images. London/Burlington, San Diego: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2007.
Holmes A, Poline JB, Friston KJ. Characterizing brain images with the general linear model. In: Human brain function. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997. p. 59–84.
Norman KA, Polyn SM, Detre GJ, Haxby JV. Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;10:424–30.
Friston K, Chu C, Mourão-Miranda J, et al. Bayesian decoding of brain images. Neuroimage. 2008;39:181–205.
Haynes JD, Rees G. Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:523–34.
Spiridon M, Kanwisher N. How distributed is visual category information in human occipito-temporal cortex? An fMRI study. Neuron. 2002;35:1157–65.
Cox DD, Savoy RL. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) ‘brain reading’: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex. Neuroimage. 2003;19:261–70.
Shinkareva S, Mason RA, Malave VL, et al. Using fMRI brain activation to identify cognitive states associated with perception of tools and dwellings. PLoS One. 2008;3(3):1394.
Kamitani Y, Tong F. Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:679–85.
Haynes J, Rees G. Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:686–91.
Polyn S, Natu V, Cohen J, Norman K. Category-specific cortical activity precedes retrieval during memory search. Science. 2005;310:1963–6.
Chadwick M, Hassabis D, Weiskopf N, Maguire E. Decoding individual episodic memory traces in the human hippocampus. Curr Biol. 2010;20:1–4.
Pitt MA, Myung IJ. When a good fit can be bad. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6:421–5.
Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer; 2006. http://www.springer.com/computer/image+processing/book/978-0-387-31073-2
Müller KR, Mika S, Rätsch G, et al. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2001;12:181–202.
Burges C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining Knowl Discov. 1998;2:121–67.
Tipping ME. Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res. 2001;1:211–44.
Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2006.
Mitchell TM, Hutchinson R, Niculescu RS, et al. Learning to decode cognitive states from brain images. Mach Learn. 2004;57:145–75.
Neal RM. Bayesian learning for neural networks. New York: Springer; 1996.
Vemuri P, Gunter JL, Senjem ML, et al. Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis in individual subjects using structural MR images: validation studies. Neuroimage. 2008;39:1186–97.
Phillips C, Bruno MA, Maquet P, et al. “Relevance vector machine” consciousness classifier applied to cerebral metabolism of vegetative and locked-in patients. Neuroimage. 15 May 2011;56(2):797–808.
Chan AM, Halgren E, Marinkovic K, Cash SS. Decoding word and category-specific spatiotemporal representations from MEG and EEG. Neuroimage. 2011;54:3028–39.
Knopman DS, DeKosky ST, Cummings JL, et al. Practice parameter: diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review). report of the quality standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2001;56:1143–53.
Kloppel S, Stonnington CM, Chu C, et al. Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2008;131:681–9.
Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR, et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:579–89.
Sorger B, Dahmen B, Reithler J, et al. Another kind of ‘BOLD response’: answering multiple-choice questions via online decoded single-trial brain signals. In: Progress in brain research. Vol 177. Elsevier; 2009. p. 275–92. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/bookdescription.cws_home/720425/description#description
Mitchell TM, Shinkareva SV, Carlson A, et al. Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science. 2008;30:1191–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schrouff, J., Phillips, C.L.M. (2012). Multivariate Pattern Recognition Analysis: Brain Decoding. In: Schnakers, C., Laureys, S. (eds) Coma and Disorders of Consciousness. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2440-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2440-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2439-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2440-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)