Skip to main content

Multivariate Pattern Recognition Analysis: Brain Decoding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Coma and Disorders of Consciousness

Abstract

Advanced mathematical tools are still under development to allow the classification of more complicated experimental data sets, such as examining the content of mind wandering or detecting the state of consciousness of a patient showing no response to a command. Nevertheless, in view of the recent advances in multivariate pattern analysis, brain decoding techniques will certainly become more common in the study of consciousness. Their application as a diagnostic tool to differentiate patients presents obvious advantages such as objectiveness, automation and the fact that a posterior probability can be provided with the final prediction, compared to current time-consuming and subjective criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on bloodoxygenation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:9868–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Friston KJ, Ashburner JT, Kiebel SJ, et al. Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of functional brain images. London/Burlington, San Diego: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holmes A, Poline JB, Friston KJ. Characterizing brain images with the general linear model. In: Human brain function. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997. p. 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Norman KA, Polyn SM, Detre GJ, Haxby JV. Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;10:424–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Friston K, Chu C, Mourão-Miranda J, et al. Bayesian decoding of brain images. Neuroimage. 2008;39:181–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haynes JD, Rees G. Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:523–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Spiridon M, Kanwisher N. How distributed is visual category information in human occipito-temporal cortex? An fMRI study. Neuron. 2002;35:1157–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox DD, Savoy RL. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) ‘brain reading’: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex. Neuroimage. 2003;19:261–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shinkareva S, Mason RA, Malave VL, et al. Using fMRI brain activation to identify cognitive states associated with perception of tools and dwellings. PLoS One. 2008;3(3):1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamitani Y, Tong F. Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:679–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Haynes J, Rees G. Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:686–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Polyn S, Natu V, Cohen J, Norman K. Category-specific cortical activity precedes retrieval during memory search. Science. 2005;310:1963–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chadwick M, Hassabis D, Weiskopf N, Maguire E. Decoding individual episodic memory traces in the human hippocampus. Curr Biol. 2010;20:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pitt MA, Myung IJ. When a good fit can be bad. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6:421–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer; 2006. http://www.springer.com/computer/image+processing/book/978-0-387-31073-2

  16. Müller KR, Mika S, Rätsch G, et al. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2001;12:181–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burges C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining Knowl Discov. 1998;2:121–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tipping ME. Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res. 2001;1:211–44.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell TM, Hutchinson R, Niculescu RS, et al. Learning to decode cognitive states from brain images. Mach Learn. 2004;57:145–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Neal RM. Bayesian learning for neural networks. New York: Springer; 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Vemuri P, Gunter JL, Senjem ML, et al. Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis in individual subjects using structural MR images: validation studies. Neuroimage. 2008;39:1186–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Phillips C, Bruno MA, Maquet P, et al. “Relevance vector machine” consciousness classifier applied to cerebral metabolism of vegetative and locked-in patients. Neuroimage. 15 May 2011;56(2):797–808.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chan AM, Halgren E, Marinkovic K, Cash SS. Decoding word and category-specific spatiotemporal representations from MEG and EEG. Neuroimage. 2011;54:3028–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Knopman DS, DeKosky ST, Cummings JL, et al. Practice parameter: diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review). report of the quality standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2001;56:1143–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kloppel S, Stonnington CM, Chu C, et al. Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2008;131:681–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR, et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:579–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sorger B, Dahmen B, Reithler J, et al. Another kind of ‘BOLD response’: answering multiple-choice questions via online decoded single-trial brain signals. In: Progress in brain research. Vol 177. Elsevier; 2009. p. 275–92. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/bookdescription.cws_home/720425/description#description

  29. Mitchell TM, Shinkareva SV, Carlson A, et al. Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science. 2008;30:1191–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Schrouff M.Sc. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schrouff, J., Phillips, C.L.M. (2012). Multivariate Pattern Recognition Analysis: Brain Decoding. In: Schnakers, C., Laureys, S. (eds) Coma and Disorders of Consciousness. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2440-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2440-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2439-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2440-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics