Skip to main content

Deep Brain Stimulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Coma and Disorders of Consciousness

Abstract

Currently, disorders of consciousness are relatively well defined but therapeutic options remain relatively restricted. Because empirical evidence for pharmacological treatments is missing, another therapeutic option, while invasive, is increasingly considered. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) aims to treat neurological disorders by stimulating particular brain structures using a surgically implanted neurostimulator. This technique is used in different neurological diseases but mainly in Parkinson’s disease, for which technological advances have allowed the treatment of a large number of patients. Since the 1950s, the number of DBS studies on vigilance and disorders of consciousness still grows. Nowadays, results of DBS for the treatment of disorders of consciousness are becoming more and more promising. We propose in this chapter a description of the DBS technique, an outline of previous clinical applications, a review of studies using this technique in patients with disorders of consciousness, along with a summary of mechanisms explaining the efficacy of DBS for treating these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Laureys S, Owen AM, Schiff ND. Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:537–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartholow R. Experimental investigations into the functions of the human brain. Am J Med Sci. 1874;67:305–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Penfield W, Boldrey E. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain. 1937;60:389–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spiegel EA, Wycis HT, Marks M, Lee AJ. Stereotaxic apparatus for operations on the human brain. Science. 1947;106:349–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hosobuchi Y, Adams JE, Rutkin B. Chronic thalamic stimulation for the control of facial anesthesia dolorosa. Arch Neurol. 1973;29:158–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper IS. Effect of chronic stimulation of anterior cerebellum on neurological disease. Lancet. 1973;1:206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brice J, McLellan L. Suppression of intention tremor by contingent deep-brain stimulation. Lancet. 1980;1:1221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gervason C, et al. Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus. Lancet. 1991;337:403–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gao D, et al. Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:203–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koller WC, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB, Pahwa R. Efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the VIM nucleus of the thalamus for essential head tremor. Mov Disord. 1999;14:847–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ondo W, Jankovic J, Schwartz K, et al. Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation for refractory essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease tremor. Neurology. 1998;51:1063–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rehncrona S, Johnels B, Widner H, et al. Long-term efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor: double-blind assessments. Mov Disord. 2003;18:163–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar R, Dagher A, Hutchison WD, et al. Globus pallidus deep brain stimulation for generalized dystonia: clinical and PET investigation. Neurology. 1999;53:871–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sellal F, Hirsch E, Barth P, et al. A case of symptomatic hemidystonia improved by ventroposterolateral thalamic electrostimulation. Mov Disord. 1993;8:515–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lozano AM, Kumar R, Gross RE, et al. Globus pallidus internus pallidotomy for generalized dystonia. Mov Disord. 1997;12:865–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar R, Lozano AM, Sime E, Lang AE. Long-term follow-up of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential and parkinsonian tremor. Neurology. 2003;61:1601–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Putzke JD, Wharen Jr RE, Wszolek ZK, et al. Thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor-predominant Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2003;10:81–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson VC, Burchiel KJ, Hogarth P, et al. Pallidal vs subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:554–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peppe A, Pierantozzi M, Altibrandi MG, et al. Bilateral GPi DBS is useful to reduce abnormal involuntary movements in advanced Parkinson’s disease patients, but its action is related to modality and site of stimulation. Eur J Neurol. 2001;8:579–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Loher TJ, Burgunder JM, Weber S, et al. Effect of chronic pallidal deep brain stimulation on off period dystonia and sensory symptoms in advanced Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:395–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Burchiel KJ, Anderson VC, Favre J, Hammerstad JP. Comparison of pallidal and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson’s disease: results of a randomized, blinded pilot study. Neurosurgery. 1999;45:1375–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar R, Lozano AM, Montgomery E, Lang AE. Pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation of the pallidum and subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 1998;13 Suppl 1:73–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moruzzi G, Magoun HW. Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1949;1:455–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuster JM. Effects of stimulation of brain stem on tachistoscopic perception. Science. 1958;127:150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kinomura S, Larsson J, Gulyas B, Roland PE. Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei. Science. 1996;271:512–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sturm V, Kuhner A, Schmitt HP, et al. Chronic electrical stimulation of the thalamic unspecific activating system in a patient with coma due to midbrain and upper brain stem infarction. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1979;47:235–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hassler R, Ore GD, Dieckmann G, et al. Behavioural and EEG arousal induced by stimulation of unspecific projection systems in a patient with post-traumatic apallic syndrome. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1969;27:306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McLardy T, Ervin F, Mark V, et al. Attempted inset-electrodes-arousal from traumatic coma: neuropathological findings. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1968;93:25–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohadon F. Deep brain stimulation in cases of prolonged traumatic unconsciousness. In: Lazorthes Y, Upton ARM, editors. Neurostimulation: an overview. New York: Futura Publishers; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tsubokawa T, Yamamoto T, Katayama Y, et al. Deep-brain stimulation in a persistent vegetative state: follow-up results and criteria for selection of candidates. Brain Inj. 1990;4:315–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Katayama Y, Tsubokawa T, Yamamoto T, et al. Characterization and modification of brain activity with deep brain stimulation in patients in a persistent vegetative state: pain-related late positive component of cerebral evoked potential. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991;14:116–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hosobuchi Y, Yingling C. The treatment of prolonged coma with neurostimulation. In: Devinsky O, Beric A, Dogali M, editors. Electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain and spinal cord. New York: Raven; 1993. p. 247–52.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58:349–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yamamoto T, Kobayashi K, Kasai M, et al. DBS therapy for the vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;93:101–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Adams JH, Graham DI, Jennett B. The neuropathology of the vegetative state after an acute brain insult. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 7):1327–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schiff ND, Giacino JT, Kalmar K, et al. Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature. 2007;448(7153):600–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:2020–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lammi MH, Smith VH, Tate RL, Taylor CM. The minimally conscious state and recovery potential: a follow-up study 2 to 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:746–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Laureys S, Berré J, Goldman S. Cerebral function in coma, vegetative state, minimally conscious state, locked-in syndrome and brain death. In: Vincent JL, editor. Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 386–96.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Laureys S, Goldman S, Phillips C, et al. Impaired effective cortical connectivity in vegetative state: preliminary investigation using PET. Neuroimage. 1999;9:377–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Maxwell WL, MacKinnon MA, Smith DH, et al. Thalamic nuclei after human blunt head injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006;65:478–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Krout KE, Belzer RE, Loewy AD. Brainstem projections to midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 2002;448:53–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schiff ND. Central thalamic deep-brain stimulation in the severely injured brain: rationale and proposed mechanisms of action. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1157:101–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Parvizi J, Damasio A. Consciousness and the brainstem. Cognition. 2001;79:135–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fins JJ. Neuroethics and neuroimaging: moving toward transparency. Am J Bioeth. 2008;8(9):46–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Thonnard M.Sc. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thonnard, M. (2012). Deep Brain Stimulation. In: Schnakers, C., Laureys, S. (eds) Coma and Disorders of Consciousness. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2440-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2440-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2439-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2440-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics