Abstract
Attempting to evaluate 3D virtual interfaces is difficult. It has been argued that this is because we lack a natural and coherent spatial language. If this is true, then the only effective way to convey spatial information would appear to be through specialized mathematically-based geometric modelling techniques, and this may disadvantage general users employed in the evaluation of 3D virtual interfaces. In an attempt to find out if users posses a so-called ‘3D language’, and also, to increase the expressive capabilities of the user, this paper describes the preliminary work and details of an empirical study to find ways to articulate spatial information. Three articulation methods are compared: verbal, pictorial and iconic hand gestures, to determine their effectiveness to articulate spatial information about 3D shapes in a natural and intuitive way. The results from the study may be helpful in empirical evaluations of 3D virtual interfaces.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. S. Kalawsky, New Methodologies And Technologies For Evaluating User Performance, In: Advanced 3D Virtual Interfaces, D. F. A. Leevers, I. D. Benests, (eds)., The 3D Interface For The Information Worker (IEE), London, 1998.
Johnson C., Why ‘Traditional’ HCI Techniques Fail to Support Desktop VR, In: Advanced 3D Virtual Interfaces, D. F. A. Leevers, I. D. Benests, (eds)., The 3D Interface For The Information Worker (IEE), London. 1998.
International Standards Organization, DIS 9241–11, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTS), 1997.
Tromp, G. J, Methodology for Distributed Usability Evaluation in Collaborative Virtual Environments, In: Proceedings of 4th UK VR-SIG, 1997.
Lewis C, Using the “Thinking-Aloud” Method in Cognitive Interface Design, IBM Research Report: RC 9265(#40713), 1982.
Hix D. and Hartson R. H., Developing User Interfaces Ensuring Usability. Wiley, New York, 1993.
Ferguson E. S., The Mind’s Eye: Nonverbal Thought in Technology, Science, 1977: 197, 4306, 827–836.
Shepard, R. N. and J Metzler, Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects, Science, 1971: 171, 3972, 701–706.
Pylyshyn, Z. W., The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge, Psychological Review, 1981: 88, 16–45.
Gibson J. J., The information available in pictures, Leonardo, 1971: 4:27–35.
Hockett, C. F., A Course in Modern Linguistics, Macmillan, New York, 1958.
Mandel, M., Iconic devices in American Sign Language, In: Friedman, L. A. (ed.), On the Other Hand. New Perspectives on American Sign Language, Academic Press. New York, 1977. pp 57–107.
Rime, B. and L Schiaratura, Gesture and Speech, In: Feldman R. S and B. Rime (eds). Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991, pp 238–281.
Marsh, T. and A Watt, Shape Your Imagination: Iconic Gestural-Based Interaction, In: Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS98), 1998, pp 122–125.
Marsh T, An Iconic Gesture Is Worth More Than A Thousand Words, In: Proceedings of Information Visualisation ‘88, IEEE, 1998, pp 222–223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marsh, T., Wright, P. (1999). Articulation of Spatial Information: 3D Shapes. In: Paton, R., Neilson, I. (eds) Visual Representations and Interpretations. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0563-3_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0563-3_28
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-082-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0563-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive