Skip to main content

A Process-Oriented Approach to Support Dynamic Evolution in Distributed Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems Development
  • 1570 Accesses

Abstract

Dynamic evolution is beneficial and important to certain classes of distributed applications where shutdown is not always viable requiring modifications to such applications while they are executing. This paper describes Continuum, a process-oriented approach to address analysis and design aspects of dynamic evolution in software development, leveraging the flexibility of composition-based applications—like component-based and service-oriented ones—to facilitate dynamic changes. The approach begins with analyzing and extending the application lifecycle of an application to accommodate dynamic changes (i.e. while it is still executing). Then, the design of runtime modifications is carried out to progressively realize the changes, in terms of what to perform (i.e. transformations), who performs the transformations (i.e. transformation agents), and how the transformations are performed (i.e. transformation steps). A hypothetical electronic product catalogue application is used to illustrate Continuum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arnold K, Gosling J, Holmes D (2005) The Java(TM) programming language, 4th edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett KH, Rajlich VT (2000) Software maintenance and evolution: a roadmap. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference software engineering: the future of software engineerings. ACM Press, New York, pp 73–87

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bohner SA (2002) Extending software change impact analysis into COTS components. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual NASA Goddard software engineering workshop (SEW-27’02), Greenbelt, Maryland, pp 175–182

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brinkkemper S (1996) Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Inf Softw Technol 38(4):275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ecklund EF, Delcambre LML, Freiling MJ (1996) Change cases: use cases that identify future requirements. SIGPLAN Not 31(10):342–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ESI (2008) Welcome to ICCBSS 2008: weaving composite systems. http://www.iccbss.org/2008/. Accessed 3 June 2008

  7. Evans H, Dickman P (1999) Zones, contracts and absorbing change: an approach to software evolution. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGPLAN conference on object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications (OOPSLA’99), ACM Press, New York, pp 415–434

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fung KH, Low G (2009) A methodology evaluation framework for dynamic evolution in composition-based distributed applications. J Syst Softw 82(12):1950–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fung KH, Low GC, Ray PK (2004) Embracing dynamic evolution in distributed systems. IEEE Softw 21(2):49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. ISO/IEC (2007) Software engineering—metamodel for development methodologies ISO/IEC 24744:2007. ISO/IEC Press, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jayaswal K (2005) No time for down time. In: Jayaswal K (ed) Administering data centers: servers, storage, and voice over IP. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murata T (1989) Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proc IEEE 77(4):541–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. OMG (2009) Business Process Modeling Notation Specification v1.2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oreizy P, Medvidovic N, Taylor RN (2008) Runtime software adaptation: framework, approaches, and styles. In: Companion of the 30th international conference on software engineering, Leipzig, Germany, pp 899–910

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Eclipse Foundation (2009) Eclipse Process Framework Project (EPF). http://www.eclipse.org/epf/. Accessed 7 Nov 2009

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kam Hay Fung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fung, K., Low, G.C. (2011). A Process-Oriented Approach to Support Dynamic Evolution in Distributed Applications. In: Pokorny, J., et al. Information Systems Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9790-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9790-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9645-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9790-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics