Skip to main content

Spatial Variability of Soil Erodibility (K Factor) at a Catchment Scale in Nanjing, China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theory and Practice of Soil Loss Control in Eastern China

Abstract

We conducted a study to examine the spatial variability and vertical characteristics of soil erodibility (the K factor) and its relationship to vegetation types, based on a case of study on Dengxia catchment, Jiangsu Province, China. Using traditional statistical and geostatistical methods, the K factor was calculated by the EPIC model. The results showed the following: (1) the K value on the studied area was highly spatially variable, with a range from 0.15 to 0.50, a mean of 0.13, and a coefficient of variance of 22.11%; (2) the overall spatial distribution of the K values presented a clear belt shape and was higher in the northwest than in the southeast, with several high K-value centers clustered in the central and southern parts of the region. The results showed that the K factor of the areas covered by forest, mainly in the northern part, was greater than that of farmland and human residential areas in the central and southern part of the region. (3) The vertical (soil depth) variability of the K value by vegetation type followed the order K(0–20 cm) < K (20–40 cm) < K (40–60 cm) overall in the region, while farmland followed a different order, K (0–20 cm) < K (40–60 cm) < K (20–40 cm). It was shown that the K factor in the topsoil (0–20 cm) was the greatest, except for farmland. For K factor of different vegetation types in the topsoil (0–20 cm), the order was as follows: fallow land > tea garden land > farmland > grassland > broadleaf forestland > bamboo shrub land > coniferous forestland > bamboo forestland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bo ZH, Li QY (1995) Preliminary study on the methods of soil erodibility value mapping. Rural Eco-Environ 11(1):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bo ZH, Yang ZL, Bo YH et al (2002) Soil erodibility (K) value and its application in Taihu lake catchment. Acta Pedol Sin 39(3):296–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM (1994) Field scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang XS, Pan JJ, Yang ZL et al (2004) Methods of calculating and mapping soil erodibility K. Soils 36(2):177–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1991) Soil and water conservation academy, translation by the publication center of yellow river resources committee. Erodibility and erosion. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei ZD, Yang SD, Xu ZR et al (1985) Preliminary study on soil characteristics spatial distribution. J Hydraul Eng 9:10–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Shi XZ (1999) Soil erodible K in eastern hillyfields of the southern Yangtze River. Res Soil Water Conserv 6(2):47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu WD, Zhu YL, Sha J et al (1997) SPSS for windows from rudiment to mastery. Electron Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Liu LY, Yan P et al (2006) A review of soil erodibility research. Arid Land Geogr 29(1):124–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZQ (1999) Geostatistics and its application in the ecology science. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Sharply AN (1990) EPIC-erosion productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZS (1999) Soil erodibility factor of sloping cultivated land in the northeast mountain region of Yunnan Province. J Mt Sci 17(sup):10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang P, Hu XL, Jiang XS et al (2006) Spatial variability of soil erodibility K value and influence sampling densities on K value accuracy at a scale of small watershed. Bull Soil Water Conserv 26(6):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang KL, Cai YM, Liu BY et al (2001) Evaluation of soil erodibility on the Loess plateau. Acta Ecol Sin 21(20):1686–1695

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng YM, Chen H, Chen TB et al (2003) Spatial distribution patterns of Cr and Ni in soils of Beijing. Quaternary Sci 23(4):436–445

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.C. Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhang, J., DeAngelis, D., Zhuang, J. (2011). Spatial Variability of Soil Erodibility (K Factor) at a Catchment Scale in Nanjing, China. In: Theory and Practice of Soil Loss Control in Eastern China. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9679-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics