Skip to main content

Autonomy: Variable and Generative

  • Chapter
Agent Autonomy

Abstract

In the paper we discuss variable and generative forms of autonomy. Variable autonomy is discussed in terms of the practicalities in designing autonomous agents, dealing as it does with the notion of degrees of autonomy and hence issues of agent control. The major part of the paper discusses an absolute, theoretically grounded notion of autonomy: the ability to generate one's own goals. This theoretical account of autonomy is embedded in the larger SMART framework and is intimately linked with the issue of motivation. Autonomous agents are motivated agents in that for the generation of goals an agent needs a set of higher order, non-derivative sources of action, or in our terminology, motivations. Autonomous agents in the SMART framework form the basis and source of action in multi-agent systems, which can thus propagate through the other entities in the system, such as non-autonomous agents and objects. We conclude with a discussion regarding the situations an autonomous agent would be willing to relinquish its autonomy thus linking the generative and variable notions of autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  • Balkenius, C, 1993. The roots of motivation. In J. Meyer, H. L. Roitblat, and S.W. Wilson, editors, From animals to animats 2, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. 513, MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, S. and Martin, C, 1999. Agent Autonomy: Specification, Measurement, and Dynamic Adjustment. In Proceedings of the Autonomy Control Software Workshop, Autonomous Agents 1999 (Agents′99), 8–15, Seattle WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin, L. P. and Sloman, A., 1993. A study of motive processing and attention. In Prospects for Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of AISB93, 229–238, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Brainov and H. Hexmoor, Quantifying Relative Autonomy in Multi-agent Interaction, In Proceedings of the IJCAI′01 Workshop Autonomy, Delegation, and Control: Interacting with Autonomous Agents, 27–35, Seattle, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calstelfranchi, C, 1995. Guarantees for Autonomy in Cognitive Agent Architecture, In Agent Theories, Languages and Languages (ATAL’94), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 890, 56–70, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Inverno, M. and Luck, M., 1996a. A formal view of social dependence networks. In Zhang, C. and Lukosc, D., editors, Distributed Artificial Intelligence Architecture and Modelling: Proceedings of the First Australian Workshop on Distributed AI, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1087, 115–129, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Inverno, M. and Luck, M., 1996b. Formalising the contract net as a goal directed system. In Van de Velde, W. and Perram, J.W., editors, Agents Breaking Away: Proceedings of the Seventh European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1038, 72–85, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Inverno, M. and Luck, M., 1997. Development and application of a formal agent framework. In Hinchey, M.G. and Shaoying, L., editors, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods,, 222–231. IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Inverno, M. and Luck, M., 2000. Sociological Agents for Effective Social Action, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, 379–380, IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. and Graesser, A.,1997. Is it an agent or just a program?: A taxonomy for autonomous agents. In Muller, J.P., Wooldridge, M.J. and Jennings, N.R., editors, Intelligent Agents III-Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1193, 21–35. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T., 1983. Motivation. In Halliday, T. R. and Slater, P.J.B., editors, Causes and Effects. Blackwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, J.R.P., 1991. Machine motivation. In Meyer, J.A. and Wilson, S.W., editors, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour: From Animals to Animats, 238–246. MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A., 1982. Ethology: Its nature and relations with other sciences. Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3):480–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, M., 1993. Motivated Inductive Discovery. PhD thesis, University of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, M. and d’Inverno, M., 1995. A formal framework for agency and autonomy. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, 254–260. AAAI Press / MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, M. and d’Inverno, M., 1996. Engagement and cooperation in motivated agent modeling. In Distributed Artificial Intelligence Architecture and Modeling: Proceedings of the First Australian Workshop on Distributed AI, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1087, 70–84. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, M. and d’Inverno, M, 2001. Autonomy: A Nice Idea in Theory. In Intelligent Agents VII, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1986, 351–353, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P., 1989a. The dynamics of action selection. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 991–997, Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P., 1989b. How to do the right thing. Connection Science, l(3):291–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P., 1991, A bottom-up mechanism for behaviour selection in an artificial creature. In J. A. Meyer and S.W. Wilson, editors, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour: From Animals to Animals, 238–246. MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, D. and Frijda, N.H., 1995. Where there’s a will there’s an agent. In M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings, editors, Intelligent Agents: Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 890, 245–260. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, D., Frijda, N.H. and Phaf, R.H., 1993. Analysis of a model of emotions. In Prospects for Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of AISB93, 219–228, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, T.J. and Long, D., 1995. Goal creation in motivated agents. In Wooldridge, M.J. and Jennings, N.R., editors, Intelligent Agents: Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 890, 277–290. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, T.J. and Long, D., 1996. Alarms: An implementation of motivated agency. In M. Wooldridge, J.P. Muller, and M. Tambe, editors, Intelligent Agents: Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1031, 219–234. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnepf, U., 1991. Robot ethology: A proposal for the research into intelligent autonomous systems. In J. A. Meyer and S.W. Wilson, editors, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour: From Animals to Animats, 465–474. MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A., 1979. Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. In Models of Thought, 29–38. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A., 1987. Motives, mechanisms, and emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1(3):217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A. and Croucher, M., 1981. Why robots will have emotions. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 197–202, Vancouver, B.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, D.L., 1991. Eight principles for building an intelligent robot. In J. A. Meyer and S.W. Wilson, editors, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour: From Animals to Animats. 462–464, MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luck, M., D’Inverno, M., Munroe, S. (2003). Autonomy: Variable and Generative. In: Hexmoor, H., Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R. (eds) Agent Autonomy. Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations, vol 7. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9198-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9198-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4833-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9198-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics